FO° Talks: The Evolving Role of Diplomats in a New World Order

In the latest FO° Talks, Peter Isackson interviews Jean-Daniel Ruch, a seasoned diplomat and political advisor, discussing the evolving role of diplomacy in the 21st century. Diplomats face new challenges in promoting peace amid modern warfare, with intelligence services influencing policy decisions. Ruch emphasizes the critical perspective diplomats bring, particularly in addressing political, historical, and religious aspects in shaping policy options.

Check out our comment feature!

In this edition of FO° Talks, Fair Observer Chief Strategy Officer Peter Isackson speaks with Jean-Daniel Ruch, who served as Switzerland’s ambassador to Serbia, Turkey and Israel. Ruch was also a political advisor to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Isackson and Ruch delve into the evolving role of diplomacy in the 21st century.

Traditionally, the role of the diplomat has been to promote peace by keeping political leaders informed. Diplomats serve not only as their government’s voice but as its eyes and ears in world capitals. They speak with important leaders, assess the mood and motivations of their host country and relay their assessments back home. These assessments are vital for giving political leaders the options they need to best manage relations and avoid or end war.

In the era of modern warfare, however, things have changed. The West is involved in two ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza. In these conflicts, governments increasingly rely on intelligence services and military intelligence to provide assessments and recommend policy options. This trend has reached a tipping point that has now endowed intelligence services with greater influence in defining policy than diplomats. Political leaders have largely sidelined diplomats, relegating them to the role of mouthpieces who announce decisions they have already made in consultation with intelligence.

This is a dangerous trend. An intelligence analyst is not a substitute for a diplomat. Diplomats bring a unique and invaluable perspective to the table. They seek to comprehend not only their nation's interests but also the complex web of interests of all actors involved. Effective diplomats develop an acute understanding of the concept of indivisible security, which is to say, the security and interests of all of the actors involved. While intelligence and the military focus on security alone, diplomats have the task of bringing into the equation essential political, historical, cultural and religious aspects, making their role pivotal in shaping policy options.

The legacy of Cold War tensions

The issues in Israel have become a diplomat's nightmare. Diplomats have been crying for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, but nothing has come of their repeated attempts. Part of the issue with a two-state solution is that no major political capital has been willing to invest in finding and implementing a solution.

Russia is the other major problem that diplomats must now deal with. Ruch maintains that the war in Ukraine could potentially have been avoided, well before the Russian invasion. When Vladimir Putin became president in 2000, US President Bill Clinton was finishing up his second term. Putin met with Clinton and suggested the idea of Russia joining NATO. Clinton appeared favorable to the suggestion, but later that same day, when the two met again, Clinton explained that his people told him Russia's joining NATO was not possible.

Europeans have debated the question of pan-European security for decades. Moscow advocated but never implemented ot. French President Macron at various times before, and even after the Russian invasion he was favorable to a solution based on this principle, but to no effect. 

The issues with Russia have always been present, and this is because the mentality of the Cold War never disappeared. The West perceived the Soviets as a threat to the West because they came with a totally different model of society. After the Cold War, the US and the Soviets needed to reach some kind of mutual understanding, if only to prevent a nuclear holocaust, which the world came close to experiencing during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. The most important of these agreements was the ABM Treaty of 1972. George W. Bush scrapped this treaty in the early 2000s at the same time he was launching new wars in the Middle East.

Since those events, mistrust has become a dominant factor in the relationship between Washington and Moscow.

[Jean-Daniel Ruch's latest book, Crimes, Hate, Tremors: From One Cold War to the Other, in Pursuit of Peace and Justice, is now available on Amazon.]

[Liam Roman wrote the first draft of this piece.]

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO° Talks: Did Russia Recruit Donald Trump as a Spy? Former CIA Officer Reveals

July 13, 2025

FO° Talks: Denuclearization or Regime Change: Why Did Israel Strike Iran?

July 12, 2025

FO° Talks: Israel Strikes Iran. Tehran Hits Back. What Now?

July 11, 2025

FO° Talks: From MAGA to Gaza: How Trump Changed US–Israel Relations Forever

July 10, 2025

Eastminster and Vice-Regalism: How the British Empire Still Shapes Former Colonies

July 09, 2025

FO° Talks: Meet Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar, Prince of Udaipur

FO° Exclusive: What Will the Middle East Look Like if Iran’s Islamic Regime Falls?

July 04, 2025

FO° Talks: Taking Stock of the DeepSeek Revolution, with Sanjay Mittal

June 25, 2025

FO° Talks: The Case for a Responsible Right in the US

June 20, 2025

FO° Talks: The Culture of Culture, Part 4: The Sacred Origins of Music

June 15, 2025

FO° Talks: The New Strategic Landscape in India–Pakistan Relations

June 12, 2025

FO° Live: Make Sense of the Houthis and Civil War in Yemen

FO° Exclusive: Hunger Now Strikes Gaza and Big Crisis Brews in Israel

June 04, 2025

FO° Exclusive: US Budget and US–China Tariff Deal Unleash New Economic Uncertainty

June 02, 2025

FO° Talks: US–Israeli Relations Explained, Part 3: Shifting Coalitions

May 31, 2025

FO° Talks: US–Israeli Relations Explained, Part 2: Consequences of the Six-Day War

May 29, 2025

FO° Talks: US–Israeli Relations Explained, Part 1: Post-World War II

May 27, 2025

FO° Talks: Islamist Terrorist Attack Triggers New India–Pakistan Tensions

May 21, 2025

FO° Talks: An Indian Ringside View of the Russia–Ukraine Conflict

May 20, 2025

FO° Talks: A Ukrainian Refugee Reflects on the Russia–Ukraine War

May 17, 2025

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA