The New York Times on Monday reported that the US has accused China âof breaching Microsoft email systems used by many of the worldâs largest companies.â On the same day, The Washington Post announced the findings of an investigation into âspyware licensed by an Israeli firm to governments for tracking terrorists and criminals.â The Pegasus spyware supplied by the Israeli firm NSO targeted âjournalists, human rights activists, business executives and two women close to murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi,â as well as three sitting presidents and three current prime ministers, a king and a host of high-profile officials around the world.
With American troops wending their way home from the 20-year-long hot war in Afghanistan, the new cold war that recently became a dominant theme in American electoral politics has taken a curious turn. The original Cold War had meaning because it appeared to be a largely equitable match between the United States and the Soviet Union. That changed with the implosion of the USSR in 1991. What didnât change was the psychological dependence of American administrations on their ability to identify existential threats from abroad. What better way, after all, to distract from the growing disarray visible within its own society?
Are Americans Waiting for a Cyber Apocalypse?
The decade that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union demonstrated the scope of the problem. In his 2000 presidential campaign, grammatically challenged George W. Bush lamented the fact that the nation had lost the reassuring feeling of living in âa dangerous worldâ in which âyou knew exactly who they were. It was us versus them, and it was clear who them was.â Bush was nevertheless convinced that there was an enemy on whom the nation could concentrate its fears.
Just eight months into his first term, after being elected by the Supreme Court, Bush got lucky. Islamic terrorism stepped in to play the role of archvillain, becoming the steed three presidents would ride for the next two decades, though its effect would wear with time. Despite the FBIâs persistent campaign to incite rudderless young Muslims to play the role of domestic terrorists â even funding plots that were subsequently âthwartedâ by the FBI itself â homegrown Islamic terrorism has never lived up to its role as the existential threat the nationâs leaders wished for. Thatâs why Russia and China are back.
The response to Islamic terrorism has been so chaotic and mismanaged that, instead of unifying the nation as it once did in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, it has had the effect of fragmenting society beyond recognition. Americans now live to hate and cancel other Americans. The most identifiable enemies are peopleâs own neighbors or fellow citizens with contrasting mindsets.
After the debacle of Trumpâs election in 2016, establishment Democrats seeking a scapegoat focused on Russia as the source of the nationâs deepest fears. Their marketing geniuses imagined what they termed âcollusionâ between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. Republicans preferred to focus on China, though the business wing of the Republican party continues to see China as a burgeoning marketplace for its goods.
Now that Russia and China practice the virtues of capitalism, it has become more difficult to frame the rivalry in purely military terms, though the pressure to launch a new arms race is as real as ever. But that has more to do with the fact that the military-industrial complex has become the core of the industrial economy. The new focus is on the notion of cyberthreat. The Cold War is morphing into the Code War.
In April, The Times reported that the Biden administration had âimposed extensive new sanctions on Russiaâ for the famous SolarWinds hack. It did so on the grounds that the Russian government may have been involved, though, as WhatIs.com reported, it is clearly a question of belief rather than established fact: âFederal investigators and cybersecurity agents believe a Russian espionage operation â most likely Russia‘s Foreign Intelligence Service â is behind the SolarWinds attack.â One of the curious features of the SolarWinds attack is that nobody seems to know if there were any consequences other than the gathering of economic information. âThe purpose of the hack remains largely unknown,â WhatIs reports.
If the complaint about Russian and Chinese industrial spying is little more than rebranded old news in the Russiagate tradition, the most substantial piece of new news is The Washington Postâs scoop about NSOâs software. The fact that it was used to spy on the widest diversity of targets by various governments not averse to exaggerated forms of despotism makes it distinctive and seriously troubling. This isnât industrial espionage â itâs people espionage.
What has been the reaction in Israel? While the Israeli government has remained silent, The Washington Post notes that the âNSO Group firmly denies false claims made in your report which many of them are uncorroborated theories that raise serious doubts about the reliability of your sources, as well as the basis of your story.â
Todayâs Daily Devilâs Dictionary definition:
1. A common way of describing a boatload of unconnected facts that all point toward a personâs or an institutionâs accountability
2. Most of what appears in the news to justify the aggressive foreign policy Americans now believe is a feature of their nationâs identity
The New York Times described the latest scandal in these terms: âA major Israeli cyber-surveillance company, NSO Group, came under heightened scrutiny Sunday after an international alliance of news outlets reported that governments used its software to target journalists, dissidents and opposition politicians.â A person suspected of a major crime is arrested and eventually charged. In todayâs neoliberal world, a company, even in the presence of massive evidence, is merely subjected to âheightened scrutiny.â
The goal of those using the software is the theft of private information and includes setting up kidnaps and murders, allegedly including the gruesome killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Reuters explains what the US Justice Department believes to be the goal of the Chinese hackers: âThe campaign targeted trade secrets in industries including aviation, defense, education, government, health care, biopharmaceutical and maritime industries.â In other words, China’s crime is industrial spying rather than political espionage. It is about property rather than people, or what Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco condemned as an attempt âto steal what other countries make.â
It is an observable fact in the functioning of todayâs legal systems that protecting private property is far more important than the security of the population. National interest has come to be synonymous with corporate interest. The nations whose corporations historically grew by stealing the resources of the rest of the world after subjecting their populations to colonial rule see no crime as heinous as the attempts of those exploited nations and regions to use modern technology, not to steal, but to learn how to exploit the same processes the advanced economies have built.
Stealing ideas and processes â or industrial plagiarism â has always been a feature of dynamic economies. Defenders of the letter of the law complain that violating patents kills innovation. On the contrary, the prevention of the transfer of immaterial knowledge encourages monopoly. That not only stifles innovation but creates the conditions for various forms of oppression, including the ability to steal with impunity from weaker rivals. In October 2020, Business Insider reported the allegation against Amazon. An antitrust report by the House Judiciary Committee determined that âAmazon uses third-party seller data to copy the site’s most popular products.â
The Times offers this historical reminder: âWhile there is nothing new about digital espionage from Russia and China â and efforts by Washington to block it â the Biden administration has been surprisingly aggressive in calling out both countries and organizing a coordinated response.â Biden seeks to be remembered not as the new FDR, but as the defender of the neoliberal order and the consolidation of the corporate oligarchy as the virtual government overseeing a form of democracy that has been reduced to a set of electoral rituals.
Capitalists will always seek to steal what others have done. That is called getting an edge on the competition. Sometimes they can do it legally, but often they will do it illegally after taking a maximum number of precautions to avoid being caught. In todayâs world of asymmetric economic warfare, the stronger corporations will get away with it, and the stronger nations will find effective ways of punishing those that are trying to catch up.
*[In the age of Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain, another American wit, the journalist Ambrose Bierce, produced a series of satirical definitions of commonly used terms, throwing light on their hidden meanings in real discourse. Bierce eventually collected and published them as a book, The Devilâs Dictionary, in 1911. We have shamelessly appropriated his title in the interest of continuing his wholesome pedagogical effort to enlighten generations of readers of the news. Read more of The Daily Devilâs Dictionary on Fair Observer.]
The views expressed in this article are the authorâs own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observerâs editorial policy.