• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • US Election
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Russia Supports Syria For Old Times’ Sake

By Anna Pivovarchuk • Jul 10, 2012

Russia supports Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad for historic, economic and strategic reasons.

The United Nations estimates that, since the Syrian uprising began in March 2011, as many as 15,000 people have lost their lives. Unlike the 1982 Hama massacre, when Bashar al-Assad’s father, Hafez, brutally put down a Muslim Brotherhood uprising that saw 10,000 to 40,000 people killed, the current conflict in Syria has gathered enormous global attention.

Those outraged by Russia’s opposition to military intervention in Syria tend to lose track of the ties between the two countries that stem from the Cold War. When, after World War II, the Soviet Union and the US emerged as the dominant world powers, the Middle East and its oil reserves became a focal point for both. After Syria joined a pro-Soviet pact in 1955 along with Egypt, Nikita Khrushchev poured more than US$200m in military aid in the following five years. Following Egypt’s defeat by Israel in 1973 and Gamal Abdel Nasser’s acceptance of US mediation, Syria became a central aspect of Soviet policy in the Middle East. Between 1980 and 1990, military supplies reached $26bn, making Soviet arms account for over 90% of Syrian military equipment.

Why Does Russia Oppose Intervention in Syria?
It is believed that economic benefits are the main reason for Russia’s current position on Syria. As a de facto client state of the Soviet era, with a brief fissure in the 1990s, Syria became the fifth largest buyer of Russian weapons in 2011, with contracts of up to $3.8bn. From 2007 to 2010, arms exports to Syria doubled from $2.1bn to $4.7bn, while supplies to Iran dipped from $2.1bn to $300m in the same period. Russian investments in the Syrian economy were at around $19.5bn in 2011.

In 1997, Russian contracts for the development of Iraqi oil fields were priced at $3.5bn. Through careful investment and diplomacy, Russia gained control over one third of the region’s oil and almost half of its natural gas output by 2001. All these benefits were lost with the invasion of Iraq. In February 2012 Russia announced new plans to modernise its military-industrial complex by 2020. The country therefore needs Syria as a business partner – that, and stable, high oil prices.

Politically, Syria remains Russia’s strategic ally in the Middle East – one of the last. In the Soviet era, Syrian opposition to US-backed negotiations on the Arab-Israeli conflict gave Russia access to the peace-making process. The Soviet naval base at Tartus, currently the only Russian military base outside the former Soviet Union, provided a means of countering US presence in the region, especially during the escalation of the conflict in Lebanon in 1982. Although its tactical importance is disputable, its symbolic value is unquestionable. Tensions over Iran’s nuclear programme and former President Dmitri Medvedev’s 2010 ban on arms sales to Tehran in compliance with UN sanctions, leaves Syria as perhaps the only real foothold Russia has left in the region. Even despite a recent thaw with Tehran.

Putin Feels Threatened
For Vladimir Putin, newly re-elected for his third term as Russia’s president amid mass protests, the situation in Syria raises unpleasant parallels. Many commentators compare the autocratic solidarity and illegitimacy of the Putin and Assad regimes. US Senator John McCain’s warning that the Arab uprisings will soon come to Moscow may have done more damage than intended. Comparisons in the media of the Arab uprisings with the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe are also hardly helpful.

Even after the Cold War ended, and especially after the unsanctioned Kosovo campaign of 1999, Russia continues to view the West and the US not only with suspicion, but as a direct threat to its strategic and national interests, bringing regime change too close to home. When the humanitarian campaign in Libya ended in the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi, Russia was put ill at ease and felt ‘betrayed’ by the West. Surrounded by a number of weak states on its borders, Russia has every reason to question not only the motivations of NATO powers but also their readiness to intervene in what Russia views as internal conflicts.

The Parallel of Islamic Extremism
Another key element of Russian support for Syria is its own unabated struggle with Islamic extremism in the North Caucasus. The protracted, brutal conflict in Chechnya, though officially over, has created a simmering insurgency not only in Chechnya but also neighbouring Dagestan that often spills out into terrorist attacks. While this is a regular occurrence in the region, it also affects the rest of Russia as the deadly attacks on the Moscow metro in 2010 and the Domodedovo airport in 2011 demonstrate.

Although commentators agree that an Arab uprising-style revolution is unlikely to flare up in either the Central Asian republics or the North Caucasus, chaos in the Middle East and Islamists gaining power would bolster the cause of the Caucasian jihad.

This attitude helps explain Russia’s ties with Iran and its conservative clerics. By aligning with the regime in Tehran, Russia has managed to minimise its support to Chechen separatists, while Iran has also been a useful ally in combating drug and human trafficking.

Indeed, Russia is less optimistic than the West about democratic values being upheld by the current opposition in Syria and Putin has warned that Western attempts to impose democracy might lead to the rise of Islamism that can spread to the North Caucasus. He should be careful, however. The pro-Chechen website KavkazCenter, often accused of extremist propaganda, has published condemnations of the massacres of innocent Muslims by "Putin’s friends" in Syria. In trying to keep a political ally in power for the sake of stability in the region, the Russian government risks unleashing yet another raging grievance in its backyard.

Is Opposing Military Intervention Harmful to Syria?

With the failed Kofi Annan Plan, and the new unity government plan seemingly unrealistic, there currently seems to be no real alternative for a peaceful solution in Syria.

It is unlikely that the US will act without a UN resolution. After all, with the frequent explosions in Damascus and the continued massacres of civilians throughout the country, the situation in Syria closely resembles the beginning of the Iraqi insurgency. And the Obama Administration will have to think twice before committing itself to anything more substantial than pushing for a ceasefire agreement.

The other solution is to arm the opposition — which would escalate the civil war — in hope that the rebels will win. This strategy is more than risky, given the murky, volatile state of the Syrian opposition, which seems to have lost all identifiable parameters.

The question that needs to be asked is whether the Russian and Chinese opposition to military intervention is harmful to Syria, or whether it is the sensible option in a conflict that has escalated beyond the point where humanitarian intervention would have been effective?

Russia and China might be at fault for having protracted the negotiations. But, aside from the cynical geo-political considerations listed above, Russia, and indeed China, might be genuinely worried about the consequences of supporting an unidentified opposition.

They must, however, be careful lest its definition of ‘autonomy’ becomes synonymous with unchecked government power, both at home and abroad. Indeed, one must also keep in mind that to ask Russia to support military intervention against Syria and its ruling Ba’ath Party, would not be too unlike expecting the US to intervene in Israel on behalf of the Palestinians – if a Syrian-style civil war were to erupt there.

Realpolitik is alive and well, and it is tragic that Syrian civilians are paying the price for its continued health.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Europe, International Security, Middle East & North Africa, Politics
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

The Geopolitics of the Syrian Civil War (Part 2/2)
By Joseph Hughes • Jul 31, 2014
Syria’s Salafi Awakening: Existential Psychological Primers (Part 2/2)
By Zach Goldberg • Jul 31, 2014
The Geopolitics of the Syrian Civil War (Part 1/2)
By Joseph Hughes • Jul 20, 2014
Syria’s Salafi Awakening: Existential Psychological Primers (Part 1/2)
By Zach Goldberg • Jul 15, 2014
The Hezbollah Cavalcade: Iran’s Important Weapon in the Middle East
By Nicholas Heras & Phillip Smyth • Jun 07, 2014
100 Years Later: Lessons for the US in Syria
By Max Reibman • May 21, 2014
France's Gung-Ho Policy in Syria
By Clotilde de Swarte • Mar 28, 2014
The Fallout From Syria: Hate Speech in Indonesia
By Navhat Nuraniyah • Mar 25, 2014
Policy From Inside the Perimeter: No Finger in the Wind
By David Holdridge • Mar 12, 2014
Returning From Syria: Terrorism in the West
By Paul Ashley • Mar 01, 2014
The End of a Unified Syria
By Carl Anthony Wege • Sep 04, 2013
Chemical Attacks and Military Interventions
By Omar S. Dahi • Aug 28, 2013
The Alawite Question
By Dina Yazdani • Aug 22, 2013
International Jihad and the Syrian Conflict
By Nicholas Heras & Aaron Zelin • Aug 07, 2013
Syria and the Crumbling Region: A Look at Lebanon
By Helios Global • Jul 17, 2013
The Prevalence of Sectarianism: Hezbollah and the Syrian Civil War
By Josef Olmert • May 27, 2013
Who Will Be Syria's Knight Sans Armor? (Part 1/2)
By Jennifer Helgeson • May 18, 2013
Stop Syria From Becoming an Afghan-Style Disaster
By Dmitri Trenin • Mar 21, 2013
Syria: All the King's Horses...
By David Holdridge • Feb 14, 2013
Syria: Political Dialogue and the Rise of Salafists
By Rajai Masri • Feb 02, 2013
The Middle East in 2013
By Juan Cole • Jan 01, 2013
Will Brahimi Reach a Breakthrough in Syria?
By Vijay Prashad • Dec 30, 2012
Is Chaos in Syria the Way Out?
By Maksymilian Czuperski • Nov 18, 2012
Syria: At the Epicenter of Regional Fault Lines
By Adrian Shahbaz • Jul 23, 2012
Libya to Syria: R2P and the ‘Double Standards’ Issue
By Jean-Baptiste Jeangene Vilmer • Jul 23, 2012
Assad at the Tipping Point
By Jeffrey Laurenti • Jun 10, 2012
Don't Despair on Annan’s Syria Plan, Yet
By Jeffrey Laurenti • Apr 24, 2012
Annan Plan Up Against the Syrian Wall
By Jeffrey Laurenti • Apr 10, 2012
The Revolution Will Be Uploaded: Citizen Journalism in Homs
By Nicholas Heras • Mar 04, 2012
Adding Fuel to Syria's Fire
By Foreign Policy in Focus • Feb 16, 2012
Russia’s Hard-Nosed Realism in Syria: The Roots and Reasoning
By Gordon Hahn • Feb 16, 2012
The UN's Return on Syria
By Jeffrey Laurenti • Feb 15, 2012
Is Assad’s Syria ‘Too Important to Fail’ for the Resistance Axis?
By Kevjn Lim • Feb 13, 2012
A Test of Wills: The Arab League Asserts Itself in Syria
By Nicholas Heras • Feb 13, 2012
Chaos in Syria
By Ari Katz • Feb 05, 2012
Damascus: Assad's Fortress
By Ayya Harraz • Jan 27, 2012
"Cold War" in West Asia: Asia Pacific Nations Look On
By Zorawar Daulet Singh • Jan 26, 2012
The Need for Intervention in Syria
By Hina Mahmood • Jan 12, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Images of the Colonial Past and Identity Politics on the Korean Peninsula
Next PostNext India in 2012: Strategic and Security Challenges Beckon
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept