• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • US Election
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

COVID-19 Contact Tracing: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

Contact tracing may not only be dangerous in its scope and potential to abuse consumers’ private data, but may also be unnecessary.
By Claire Downing • Jun 10, 2020
Claire Downing, contact tracing COVID-19, contact tracing apps, contact tracing apps Apple, contact tracing Google, coronavirus contact tracing, Germany contact tracing system, state surveillance, dangers of contact tracing, is high-tech contact tracing necessary

© bob boz / Shutterstock

As the world continues to grapple with the implications of the COVID-19 crisis, including mass infection and death, a global economic downturn and the stigmatization of minority communities, the rush to reopen and “get back to work” weighs hard on world leaders. Along with vaccine development, contact tracing has been touted as a necessary tool to help stop the spread of the virus. But for many minority communities across the globe as well as data privacy advocates, the promise of contact tracing is met with trepidation. While contact tracing and other forms of surveillance may seem like a panacea, a pandemic is not the time to grant the private sector and governments further reason to abuse civil liberties.

As a public health tool employed in crises such as Ebola and others, contact tracing is designed to track the people with whom a person infected with COVID-19 or another infectious disease may have come into contact, and thereby slow the spread of the disease. While there are some general questions about how effective contact tracing can be, there are also several specific and troubling data and rights-related risks that contract tracing poses.

Our Data

First, big tech companies like Apple and Google have offered to build out their contact tracing capabilities but have thus far refused to share this information with health officials, thereby rendering the efforts largely useless for public health purposes. Yet these efforts let the companies continue to collect a massive amount of personal and private data, and they are no stranger to criticism and lawsuits over their handling of said data. It is reasonable to ask what the companies will be doing with this data if and when the coronavirus pandemic is under control.

Second, some lesser-known companies’ efforts at contact tracing apps have gone the opposite direction, that is to partner directly with state governments in the US, and health officials on digital contact tracing efforts and sharing public health data. Yet these faulty apps are collecting users’ data in an insecure manner. A company that created a contact tracing app for North and South Dakota, for example, is now being accused of going against its own privacy policy because its app allows data to be shared with outside vendors including Foursquare and Bugfender, neither of which appear to be working on contact tracing themselves, thereby opening the door for companies to use the transferred data for marketing or other non-health-related efforts.

Third, as a recent CNN article outlines, the steady slide into mass collection of consumers’ private details has accelerated post-9/11, but contact tracing and other forms of digital surveillance risk would involve a different level of intimacy, that of accessing our social and health histories. Not only should we not trust big data with this information, but it is not unreasonable to assume that this information could be weaponized not only by autocratic governments but democratic ones, too. For example, given the Trump administration’s politicization of public health information and authorities, including the Centers for Disease Control and the White House Coronavirus Task Force, it is reasonable to be wary of entities like these having increased access to the public’s personal health data.

Embed from Getty Images

If one thinks that sounding the alarm about contact tracing is a bridge too far, consider the other “reforms” that governments have been pushing through during the COVID-19 crisis, likely betting that their respective citizenry will be too focused on the pandemic to care about the sweeping powers that some world leaders and legislatures are amassing, largely under the radar.

The US Senate has been quietly pushing extensions to the PATRIOT Act, the vast post-9/11 law that not only changed the way that government could surveil its citizens under the pretext of counterterrorism but continues to be a major flashpoint for minority rights groups who point to issues of targeted surveillance of Arabs and Muslims. Meanwhile, China is trying to ram through a national security law that would clamp down on dissent in Hong Kong. Over in Russia, the government is using problematic facial recognition software to crack down on quarantine violators.

Successful Contact Tracing

With all of these concerns, what is to be done? First, public health officials should consider abandoning high-tech contact tracing efforts altogether. In theory, successful contact tracing does not need to involve sophisticated technology like Bluetooth or tracking bracelets. Therefore, current and floated contact tracing efforts, ones that rely on high-tech solutions and the involvement of tech giants, may not only be dangerous in their scope and potential to abuse consumers’ private data, but also may be unnecessary. Germany, for example, which has seen relatively few coronavirus cases per capita as compared with other European countries, uses a low-tech but successful approach mainly involving simple phone calls.

Second, in this time of solidarity, there is also an opportunity for those concerned with attacks on free expression and privacy to join with human rights advocates to stop private companies and government entities from further descending into unnecessary and potentially damaging surveillance. In the US, for example, reigning in big tech is often a bipartisan effort, and libertarian lawmakers have historically expressed concern about the government’s expansion of surveillance powers.

Two such examples stand out for replication elsewhere. Several US senators and representatives recently introduced the Public Health Emergency Privacy Act, which seeks to protect the data collected through COVID-19 contact tracing efforts or more generally during a public health emergency from being used or shared for other than their intended use. Additionally, the European Union, while underscoring the need for robust digital tools to combat the coronavirus, has also urged member states to abide by the EU’s fairly strict data privacy protocols such as the General Data Protection Regulation.

While it is unlikely that autocratic states will champion legislation or regulations like those mentioned in the US and EU contexts, other democratic states must adopt similar commitments and legislation before private, health-related data gets into the wrong hands. Further, like the Public Health Emergency Privacy Act, it is imperative that any other data protection legislation introduced must apply to both corporations and governments, to prevent both misuse of data and targeting of minorities and dissenters.

From China’s surveillance of the Uighur minority to the US government’s weaponization of the PATRIOT Act against Arab and Muslim Americans, there is ample pretext for both the private sector and governments to abuse consumer data and public trust under the guise of national security or public health. But the COVID-19 pandemic is terrifying enough. Activists, public servants and elected officials who care about data privacy and human rights should make sure that this public health crisis is not used as a ploy to further erode citizens’ rights, protections and safety.  

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, China News, Coronavirus, Europe, Europe News, European politics news, Health, Insight, North America, Politics, Technology, US news, US politics news, World News TagsClaire Downing, contact tracing apps, contact tracing apps Apple, contact tracing COVID-19, contact tracing Google, coronavirus contact tracing, dangers of contact tracing, Germany contact tracing system, state surveillance
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

In Sierra Leone, COVID-19 Could Make Maternal Mortality Worse
By Emma Minor • Jul 06, 2020
Herd Immunity May Be Our Best Hope
By Daniel Wagner & Mark Eckley • Jul 06, 2020
The EU Should Collect Health Data Centrally
By Susan Bergner & Isabell Kump • Jun 29, 2020
How Will COVID-19 Change Our World?
By Atul Singh • Jun 26, 2020
How Mismanaging a Pandemic Can Cost Countries Their Soft Power
By Valerio Alfonso Bruno • Jun 18, 2020
If the Pandemic Is a “War,” Then India Needs to Spend More
By Bobby Ramakant, Sandeep Pandey & Shobha Shukla • Jun 08, 2020
What Is the Key to Tunisia Successfully Beating COVID-19?
By Bill Law • Jun 08, 2020
The Humanitarian Disaster Before Us: COVID-19 in Somalia
By Arden Bentley • Jun 06, 2020
East Africa Faces a Cascade of Crises
By Bettina Rudloff & Annette Weber • Jun 04, 2020
The Swiss People’s Party Versus COVID-19
By Hans-Georg Betz • Jun 03, 2020
The 2020 Pandemic Election
By Saurabh Jha • May 29, 2020
COVID-19 Casts a Shadow Over Swedish Exceptionalism
By Mette Wiggen • May 21, 2020
Has COVID-19 Launched a New Era of Deadly Pandemics?
By I.P. Singh & Atul Singh • May 19, 2020
COVID-19 Arrives in Refugee Camps
By Phil Cole • May 18, 2020
The Worst President at the Worst Time
By Larry Beck • May 14, 2020
South Korea Faces Challenges in a Post-Coronavirus World
By Thomas Kalinowski • May 13, 2020
Debunking Trump’s China Nonsense
By John Feffer • May 08, 2020
Global Health Policy Is World Politics
By Susan Bergner, Maike Voss & Nadine Godehardt • May 07, 2020
Will We Ever Know the True Origin of COVID-19?
By Daniel Wagner • May 06, 2020
COVID-19: What Indonesia Can Learn From South Korea and Taiwan
By Luthfi Dhofier • May 05, 2020
Brazil Struggles to Find a Unified Approach to the Coronavirus Pandemic
By Thiago Alves Ferreira & Stephanie Fillion • May 05, 2020
Narendra Modi Is Fighting COVID-19 With Little Logic
By Satish Jha • May 01, 2020
What You Need to Know About the COVID-19 Crisis in the US
By Sunil Asnani & Kshitij Bhatia • Apr 30, 2020
History Will Judge Britain’s COVID-19 Response
By Rupert Hodder • Apr 30, 2020
China’s Uncertain Recovery From COVID-19
By Maa Zhi Hong • Apr 29, 2020
Rohingya Refugee Camps Are the Next Frontline in COVID-19 Fight
By Daniel Sullivan • Apr 28, 2020
Brazil Is Heading Into a Perfect Storm
By Lenin Cavalcanti Guerra • Apr 28, 2020
India's Tactical Victory on HCQ Misses the Bigger Picture
By Mauktik Kulkarni • Apr 27, 2020
Will COVID-19 Alter the Global Order?
By Joel Blankenship • Apr 27, 2020
South Korea Shows the Way Forward for Post-Pandemic Recovery
By John Feffer • Apr 24, 2020
Why Maximum Pressure on Venezuela Is the Only Way Out
By Leonardo Vivas • Apr 22, 2020
Can the WHO Restore Credibility After Its Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic?
By Hans-Georg Betz • Apr 22, 2020
For Cybercriminals, a Global Pandemic Presents an Opportunity
By Beau Peters • Apr 17, 2020
Playing Catch-Up With the Next Pandemic
By John Feffer • Apr 17, 2020
The Politics Behind the Coronavirus in Brazil
By Helder Ferreira do Vale • Apr 15, 2020
Remembering the Easter Sunday Victims in the Shadow of COVID-19
By Amjad Saleem • Apr 14, 2020
China's Mask Diplomacy Won't Change the World Order
By Brennan Kau • Apr 09, 2020
How the US Government Failed to Prepare for a Pandemic
By Daniel Wagner • Apr 09, 2020
As President, Donald Trump Has a Duty
By Gary Grappo • Apr 08, 2020
Should We All Have Been Wearing Masks From the Start?
By Hans-Georg Betz • Apr 07, 2020
In Tajikistan, It’s Someone Else’s Virus
By Andrea Schmitz • Apr 06, 2020
Why Are Mexico and Brazil So Slow in Reacting to COVID-19?
By Lenin Cavalcanti Guerra • Apr 01, 2020
Are We Wrong About COVID-19 Death Rates?
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 31, 2020
One Antidote to Coronavirus: More Multilateralism
By Gary Grappo • Mar 30, 2020
Saudi Arabia’s Wars on Three Fronts
By Bill Law • Mar 30, 2020
The Politics of the Coronavirus
By John Feffer • Mar 27, 2020
What the Coronavirus Says About Us
By John Feffer • Mar 24, 2020
Why It’s Taking Britain So Long to Tackle COVID-19
By Rupert Hodder • Mar 23, 2020
COVID-19: What Italy and the US Are Doing Wrong
By Valerio Alfonso Bruno • Mar 10, 2020
The British Government Is About to Fail on Coronavirus
By Rupert Hodder • Mar 09, 2020
Coronavirus Outbreak Puts the World’s Governments on Notice
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 03, 2020
Coronavirus Outbreak Exacerbates Italy’s Political Divisions
By Valerio Alfonso Bruno • Feb 27, 2020
China’s Influence Dampens International Response to Coronavirus Outbreak
By Daniel Wagner • Feb 24, 2020
How Effective Is China’s Response to the Coronavirus Outbreak?
By Maa Zhi Hong • Feb 04, 2020

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious The Vanishing Social Dimension of Education in the Wake of COVID-19
Next PostNext Switzerland Confronts Its Role in the Slave Trade
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept