The far right thrives on fear. It’s no surprise, then, that it would use the latest pandemic, which has generated widespread panic, to bolster its own agenda. All of the hallmarks of the far right are in play during the coronavirus crisis. It has pushed to close borders. It has demonized foreigners and particularly border-crossers. It has spread a variety of conspiracy theories. And where it is in power —, — it has moved to increase that power through emergency measures.
COVID-19: Will We Learn the Lessons?
On the other hand, the incompetent response of someleaders — in the US, Jair Bolsonaro in — may well set back the far right in certain countries. Moreover, the scale of the threat has put on the table the kind of large-scale transformative policies that hitherto circulated only on the margins.
So, which way will the novel, known as COVID-19, ultimately push the political pendulum?
From Denial to Weaponization
Imagine if Hillary Clinton were in the White House today. The far right, led by the head of the anti-Hillary forces, , would have immediately used the “China virus” to demand that the Clinton administration close all borders and ban all immigrants and refugees. Under ordinary conditions, in other words, the far right would have had a field day in the using the coronavirus threat to advance its xenophobic agenda in the face of a liberal, cautious Washington consensus.
But with Presidentin the Oval Office rather than sitting on the sidelines lobbing the pundit’s equivalent of Molotov cocktails, the far right started out in denial. When the COVID-19 pandemic began in China at the end of December 2019, after all, it was far away and it was not infecting Americans. Even when the pathogen was detected for the first time in the US on January 21 — in a young man returning to Washington state from China — pundits continued to downplay the risk for weeks on end.
On February 24, for instance, Rush Limbaugh told his radio audience that “the is being weaponized as yet another element to bring down . Now, I want to tell you the truth about the … I’m dead right on this. The is the common cold, folks.” He would say on another occasion that the greater threat to the country was Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Party more generally. Just as becoming president didn’t make more presidential in conduct, receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom clearly didn’t make Limbaugh any more professional in conduct.
The breakdown of concern among Americans has followed the political contours of the country. Ronald Brownstein writes in The Atlantic this week:
“A flurry of new national polls released this week reveals that while anxiety about the disease is rising on both sides of the partisan divide, Democrats consistently express much more concern about it thando, and they are much more likely to say they have changed their personal behavior as a result. A similar gap separates people who live in large metropolitan centers, which have become the foundation of the Democratic electoral coalition, from those who live in the small towns and rural areas that are the modern bedrock of the .”
As the profit off the panic by raising the prices on his prepper products. It’s part of a more general wave of profiteering that encompasses Amazon price-gougers and traffickers of inside information like North Carolina Senator Richard Burr in the Senate.administration finally switched into its own incompetent version of engagement, some sections of the far right zoomed well past the denial phase. Those of a survivalist and apocalyptic bent are already halfway to their bunkers, with of Infowars infamy trying to
Neo-Nazis and sovereignists, meanwhile, are rejoicing at the failures of the federal state to handle the crisis. They are anticipating the realization of their cherished dream: the collapse of the liberal order. Still, other extremists in the QAnon camp believe that will use the virus as a pretext to arrest members of a global liberal pedophile ring (like , they simply double down when their assertions are proven wrong, as in the Comet Pizza debacle).
Then there’s the blame game. fingered North Korea as the culprit behind the . California Joanne Wright, like many of her tribe, has asserted that China manufactured the disease but added the twist that Bill Gates financed the plot. And it wouldn’t be a wacky conspiracy if George Soros somehow weren’t implicated as well.
Chinese and Asians more generally have faced a terrifying uptick in attacks and discrimination. With the appearance of each new hotspot — Iran, Italy — targeted xenophobia has been sure to follow. Soon, thanks to , it will be Americans in the crosshairs.
As far as the American far right’s anti-immigrant agenda, the announced that all undocumented migrants trying to get into this country will be summarily turned back.administration is already carrying that water. closed the border with Mexico. He
Even the migrant workers who are seasonally granted H2-A visas to work on American farms are finding it difficult to cross the border. Farm owners pushed back against a ban, forcing the administration to accept workers previously granted such visas. But the absence of new workers will still leave US agriculture dangerously understaffed.
For decades,has been at war with itself over borders — both its internal borders and its borders with the rest of the world. The has taken that war to a new level.
The overwhelming obsession of the far right in the country.has been to reduce or eliminate immigration from points east and south. Some political parties, like Germany’s Alternative fur Deutschland, even support “remigration” — namely, forcing established immigrants to leave
The Hungarian Prime Minister has said. “There is a logical connection between the two as both spread with movement.”offers the far right yet another arrow in its quiver. “We are fighting a two-front war. One front is called migration and the other one belongs to the ,”
In Italy, far-right leader declared that “allowing the migrants to land from Africa, where the presence of the virus was confirmed, is irresponsible.” At the time, there was only one reported case on the whole continent, in Egypt.has used the pandemic to push his “closed ports” policy. In February, even as the outbreak was gathering steam in his country, Salvini
In Germany, the identitarian movement hung banners proclaiming “Defend Our Borders” on the Brandenburg Gate, once a potent symbol of the erased border between eastern and western Germany. Throughout , far-right parties were retooling their “great replacement” narrative — that immigrants are poised to overwhelm majority populations — to incorporate the . The threat that outsiders supposedly pose to the health of nations has long been a singular obsession of fascists.
It wasn’t just the threat from outside the influx of Tunisians into Italy in 2011) and compromised anti-terrorist policing (in the wake of a terrorism suspect’s flight from Germany to Italy in 2016). Still, Schengen survived.. In 1995, seven European nations created the Area, which abolished their internal border controls and visa requirements. Eventually becoming subject to European Union law, the area expanded to include 26 states. Practically from the beginning, the far right has taken aim at Schengen as an unacceptable abridgment of sovereignty. It has argued that Schengen makes control of immigrants more difficult (as with
What the far right wasn’t able to do, the coronavirus managed in a matter of weeks. Some members reestablished internal border controls without notifying the EU Commission, as required by the Schengen Border Code. These moves prompted the EU to declare last week that all internal borders will be closed for 30 days. The next step for the far right, and its more mainstream conservative allies, is to try to make this temporary change permanent.
Separating the Competent…
For some illiberal leaders, the coronavirus is like a golden ticket. It allows them to sweep away what remains of the rule of law in their countries. Consider Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s extraordinary moves to hang onto power. Up until recently, things weren’t looking so good for him. He was supposed to go on trial this week for corruption. The last election provided a narrow victory to his opposition, and the head of the Blue and White alliance, Benny Gantz, was given first shot at forming a government.
But the coronavirus, a death sentence for so many people, has been a lifeline for Netanyahu. As part of a more general lockdown, the prime minister froze the judiciary. And that just happened to put his own trial on hold. Meanwhile, the speaker of the Knesset, a member of Netanyahu’s Likud party, resigned this week and closed down parliament rather than allow a vote to elect his successor, who would likely have been from the Blue and White alliance.
Because of new rules that limit public gathering, it’s impossible for people to come out on the streets to protest any of this. It goes further, as Gershom Gorenberg explains in The Washington Post. Even as the government was freezing the justice system,
“Netanyahu himself announced that the government would use electronic means to track the locations of citizens in an effort to enforce self-isolation. That quickly turned out to mean giving the Shin Bet security service the power to locate people via their cellphones. That measure, an extreme infringement on civil rights, should be vetted by a Knesset committee. Instead, Netanyahu enacted it under emergency regulations.”
Think of it as a stealth coup. Plus the transformation of Israel into a police state. Or, put another way, Israelis are now going to understand a little more of what Palestinians have known for a long time.
Viktor Orban has done something similar in Hungary. He has put a new law in front of parliament that would give his government extraordinary power to detain pretty much anyone, as Kim Lane Scheppele points out on the Hungarian Spectrum website:
“Anyone who publicizes false or distorted facts that interfere with the “successful protection” of the public — or that alarm or agitate that public — could be punished by up to five years in prison. And anyone who interferes with the operation of a quarantine or isolation order could also face a prison sentence of up to five years, a punishment that increases to eight years if anyone dies as a result.”
The first set of controls is aimed at what remains of an independent press in Hungary. The second could incarcerate anyone who objects to anything the Orban government does.
As if that’s not enough, the prime minister could, according to the proposal, “suspend the enforcement of certain laws, depart from statutory regulations, and implement additional extraordinary measures by degree.” These would be permanent changes in Hungarian law.
Many sectors of Hungarian civil society have vehemently opposed this proposed “enabling act.” And parliament failed to pass the bill on the first attempt this week. But it’s likely that Orban will try again next week, relying on his party’s comfortable majority in parliament to get it through.
…From the Incompetent
Donald Trump’s dangerously ill-informed response to the coronavirus — including such basic failures as providing test kits and other basic resources to hospitals — has incredibly not spelled his political demise. According to a recent Monmouth poll, 50% of Americans think he’s done a good job versus only 45% who give him poor marks. His approval rating has even increased a couple points. That might change as the casualties rise, particularly if the US president attempts to end the policies of social isolation early, as he has threatened to do. Or it might not, if the virus disproportionately affects blue urban areas.
For all his incompetence, Trump hasn’t been so stupid as to miss the political opportunity to push through parts of his cherished economic agenda, like further tax cuts. The Justice Department, meanwhile, is asking Congress for new emergency powers to detain people indefinitely without trial. The Trump administration is clearly looking to Israel and Hungary as examples.
Other incompetent leaders, however, may not survive politically. Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro has largely followed the same script as Trump by downplaying the risk of the pandemic. On March 15, despite having been in close contact with several members of his administration who had already contracted the disease, Bolsonaro joined a demonstration of his supporters where he touched a reported 272 people. The Brazilian president has claimed that his tests have come back negative. He also continues to argue that the crisis is little more than a media conspiracy.
Last week, millions of people appeared at their windows in the big cities to bang pots and pans in a demand for Bolsonaro to step down. Even some of his conservative backers are outraged and have turned against him. After declaring in a December column in the conservative Estado de São Paulo that Bolsonaro is “unbeatable” in the next election, political commentator Eliane Cantanhede argued more recently, “I think he’s fatally wounded for the election [in 2022] … If the election was held today there is a big chance Bolsonaro would be defeated.”
COVID-19 affects people differently depending on their underlying conditions. The same holds true for politicians. The fittest will survive, while the politically weak will be weeded out.
Time for Transformation
A nuclear apocalypse is hypothetical. The worst effects of climate change are in the future. Neither nuclear disarmament nor radical cuts in carbon emissions have been on the table because of the unfortunate tendency of politicians to minimize the risks and ignore the already considerable short-term impacts.
The coronavirus crisis is not abstract. It’s happening right now. Country after country has imposed quarantines, dramatically changing how people live, work and interact. Governments are considering massive bailouts to save the economy and bolster medical systems. But those are just quick fixes.
“We changed the way we live, work and travel to counter this pandemic, why can we not do the same to counter the climate emergency?” asks Lorenzo Marsili on Al Jazeera. “Why should we go back to a deadly status quo now that we know it is within our power to transform the way we live and organise our economy and society?”
When the quarantines end, as they inevitably will, the world will experience the same kind of rebound in carbon emissions that happened after the end of the 2009 financial crisis. So, the economic response to this pandemic must incorporate features of the Green New Deal, or we will be jumping out of a frying pan and into a literal fire.
COVID-19 is a near-death experience for the human race. Just as individuals often react to such experiences by transforming their lives, the current crisis should force a reevaluation of the status quo. Anything less will be just a temporary stay of execution.
*[This article was originally published by FPIF.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.