Blog

China Contributes to Doubts About Pakistani Crackdown on Militants

By
Pakistan news, Pakistani news, South Asian news, South Asia news, Asian news, Asia news, Latest Pakistani news, Indian news, India news, Kashmir news

Peshawar, Pakistan, 2010 © Asianet-Pakistan

August 15, 2017 09:26 EDT
Print

Treating men like Azhar and Saeed with kid gloves is unlikely to earn Pakistan any goodwill in Donald Trump’s Washington.

China, at the behest of Pakistan, has for the second time this year prevented the United Nations from listing a prominent Pakistani militant as a globally designated terrorist. Beijing’s protection of Masood Azhar, who is believed to have close ties to Pakistani intelligence and the military, comes days after another militant group — whose leader is under house arrest in Pakistan — announced the formation of a political party. The two developments cast doubt on the sincerity of Pakistan’s crackdown on militants a day after a suicide bomber killed 15 people when he rammed a motorcycle into a military truck in Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan. Baluchistan, a troubled province in which the military has supported religious militants as an antidote to nationalist insurgents, has suffered a series of devastating attacks in the past year.

Taken together, the developments are unlikely to help Pakistan as the Trump administration weighs a tougher approach toward the South Asian country as part of deliberations about how to proceed in Afghanistan, where US troops are fighting the Pakistani-backed Taliban.

US National Security Adviser General H.R. McMaster warned a week before the Chinese veto and the announcement of the new party, Milli Muslim League (MML) — by Jamaat ud-Dawa (JuD), a charity that is widely viewed as a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a group designated as terrorist by the UN — that President Donald Trump wanted Pakistan to change its “paradoxical” policy of supporting the militants. “The president has also made clear that we need to see a change in behavior of those in the region, which includes those who are providing safe haven and support bases for the Taliban, Haqqani Network and others,” McMaster said. He added that the US wanted “to really see a change in and a reduction of their support for these groups. … They have fought very hard against these groups, but they’ve done so really only selectively.”

Pakistan’s army and intelligence have used militant groups to maintain influence in Afghanistan and to support protests and an insurgency in Indian-administered Kashmir. China’s repeated veto of a UN designation of Azhar — whose group, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), has been proscribed by the international body as well as Pakistan — is not only bowing to Pakistani wishes, but also a way of keeping India on its toes at a time of heightened Chinese-Indian tension.

WHO IS MASOOD AZHAR?

Azhar, a fighter in the anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan and an Islamic scholar who graduated from a Deobandi madrassa — Darul Uloom Islamia Binori Town in Karachi, the alma mater of numerous Pakistani militants — is believed to have been responsible for an attack in 2016 on India’s Pathankot Air Force Station. The militants, dressed in Indian military uniforms, fought a 14-hour battle against Indian security forces that only ended when the last attacker was killed. Azhar, a portly bespectacled son of a Bahawalpur religious studies teacher and author of a four-volume treatise on jihad as well as books with titles like Forty Diseases of the Jews, was briefly detained after the attack and has since gone underground.

Freed from an Indian prison in 1999 in exchange for the release of passengers of a hijacked Indian Airlines flight, Azhar is also believed to be responsible for an attack in 2001 on the Indian parliament in New Delhi that brought Pakistan and India to the brink of war. Despite being banned, JeM continues to publicly raise funds and recruit fighters in mosques.

JuD sources said the charity’s transition to a political party was in part designed to stop cadres from joining the Islamic State (IS). They stated some 500 JuD activists had left the group to join more militant organizations, including IS. They added that defections often occurred after the Pakistani army launched operations against militants in areas like South Waziristan.

Pakistan listed LeT as a terrorist organization in 2002, but has only put JuD “under observation.” In 2015, Pakistan’s media regulator banned all coverage of the group’s humanitarian activities by the country’s news outlets.

JuD’s head, Muhammad Hafez Saeed, a UN- and US-designated terrorist and one of the world’s most wanted men, has been under house arrest in Pakistan since early 2017. Saeed is believed to be among others responsible for the 2008 attacks on 12 targets in Mumbai, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, a train station, a café and a Jewish center. Some 164 people were killed and more than 300 wounded. The US government has a bounty of $10 million on Saeed, who was once an LeT leader. He has since disassociated himself from the group and denied any link between JuD and LeT.

“What role [Saeed] will play in the Milli Muslim League or in Pakistan’s ongoing politics will be seen after Allah ensures his release. [Once he is released] we will meet him and ask him what role he would like to play. He is the leader of Pakistan,” MML leader Saifullah Khalid told a news conference in Islamabad on August 7. Khalid added that Saeed’s release was high on the party’s agenda. Saeed was not present at the conference, which was attended by Yahya Mujahid, a close aide of his, who is also subject to UN terrorism sanctions.

Treating men like Azhar and Saeed with kid gloves is unlikely to earn Pakistan any goodwill in Donald Trump’s Washington. China’s protection of Azhar, moreover, undermines its sincerity in claiming that it is cracking down on militancy despite its harsh policy in the restive province of Xinjiang. If anything, it could put Beijing in President Trump’s crosshairs too.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Asianet-Pakistan / Shutterstock.com

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member