From 1983 to 2009,saw a bloody civil war between the majority Buddhist and the minority Tamils. The conflict led to invaluable losses both economically and politically. To this day, the deep socio-religious wounds have yet to heal on the island in South Asia.
Since the war ended, there have been intermittent episodes of violence between ethnoreligious groups. Although the patterns seem similar, different communities are now involved in the confrontations. The focus has shifted to make Sri Lankan— who make up around 9.7% of the country’s total population — the new target of extreme Buddhist factions that jumped on the bandwagon of rising .
Islamophobia in Sri Lanka
Is India’s Vaccine Diplomacy a Good Idea?
The most serious incidents involving the Muslim community since the end of the war took place in Aluthgama in 2014, Gintota in 2017 and the Ampara and Kandy’s districts in 2018. Acts of violence involved the burning of mosques, the destruction of -owned property, the displacement of thousands of civilians and the loss of lives.
The brutal attack on Easter Sunday led to, among other things, the draconian application of the (PTA), which increased pressure on an already scrutinized minority. A well-known example of this backlash against was the case of Mohamed Shafi, a gynecologist at the Kurunegala Hospital. Shafi was arrested in 2019 under the PTA on trumped-up charges of illegally sterilizing women. Hejaaz Hizbullah, a senior lawyer, peace advocate and human rights activist, is currently in detention under the PTA. He has been accused of “aiding and abetting” one of the suicide bombers who attacked churches on Easter Sunday and “for engaging in activities deemed ‘detrimental to the religious harmony among communities.’”
Thehas provided the perfect breeding ground for far-right governments to bulldoze the human rights of minorities. In , have been the target.
In December 2020, Fahim, a three-wheeler taxi driver, and his wife mourned not only the death of their 20-day-old son, but the forced cremation of his tiny body by state authorities. The newborn was admitted to the hospital, where he passed away after contracting . Fahim was denied access to his son’s corpse and, despite refusing to give his consent, the baby was cremated just days later.
That family’s grief was felt by many petitions and pleas were made by the minority community to allow for the burial of their loved ones. Yet the Sri Lankan state, which has a long history of violence against minorities, refused to change its policy for over a year.across . Since first reached in early 2020, the government announced a mandatory cremation-only policy. The government claimed this was to prevent the possible spread of the disease by coming into contact with infected corpses. The policy alarmed Sri Lankan as cremation is forbidden in Islam. Several
The anguish experienced by Sri Lankan Amnesty International, families were “forced to bear the cost of cremation, typically around LKR 50,000-60,000 (approximately USD270-325), in a year that has economically strained many families.” The human rights organization stated, in December 2020, that many families led a difficult and painful protest by refusing to accept the ashes and making the associated payments required for cremating their loved ones.was by itself a great burden to bear during these unprecedented times. But the state did not hold back on delivering further blows to the community. According to
Burying the Dead
In April 2020, Sri Lankan declared that burials were safe. The WHO announced that there is no evidence to suggest that the , which causes the disease, can spread from an infected corpse. Meanwhile, in December, top Sri Lankan doctors released a statement urging for the burial of victims of . They stated that “each citizen of should be allowed to be cremated or buried as per his/her and the family’s desire within the strict guidelines recommended by the Ministry of Health.”saw a glimmer of hope when the World Health Organization (WHO)
Despite expert opinions and recommendations to allow BBC, Professor Malik Peiris, a world-renowned Sri Lankan virologist, stated that is “not a waterborne disease.” He added: “I haven’t seen any evidence to suggest it spreads through dead bodies. A virus can only multiply in a living cell. Once a person dies, the ability of the viruses to multiply decreases. … Dead bodies aren’t buried right in running water. Once you bury the body six feet under wrapped in impermeable wrapping, it is highly unlikely it would contaminate running water.”victims to be buried, the claimed that doing so “could contaminate ground water.” In an interview with the
In January 2021, an expert panel appointed by revised its initial guidelines by approving either burying or cremating victims. But the minister of health, Pavithra Wanniarachchi, chose to ignore the recommendation. She said in parliament that “the decision to cremate COVID dead in will not be amended on religious, political or any other grounds.” She claimed a sub-committee said corpses should be cremated.’s Ministry of Health
Sri Lankan AFP.have raised concerns at how the community reacted to the state-sanctioned racism. In January, ’s Council (SLMC) claimed that more than half of the island’s victims were from the Muslim community. “We have a disproportionate number of fatalities because don’t seek treatment fearing that they will be cremated if they are diagnosed with the virus after going to hospital,” spokesman Hilmy Ahamed told
The SLMC and accused the government of trying to provoke the youth into doing “something rash” by refusing to allow to bury their dead. There have been no reports of isolated incidents or evidence of young taking to violence in response.’s justice minister, Ali Sabry,
While hardliners, they received support from religious leaders and Sri Lankans of other faiths. Acts of solidarity took place in recent months and many Sri Lankans spoke out against the cremation-only policy. The government, which is losing public confidence over its handling of the pandemic, had been under intense pressure to overturn its decision. Aside from concerned citizens, international bodies such as the United Nations and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation condemned the forced cremations.were singled out by the state and Buddhist
On February 22, as the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) commenced its 46th annual session, issued its official gazette, finally allowing and Christian victims of to be buried.was in a precarious position. With a backlog of war crimes that remained unaddressed, a UNHRC resolution against loomed. On February 25, the
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.