FO° Live: Can South Korea Be Useful to the Quad?

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or Quad, consists of the US, India, Japan and Australia. The four powers want to counter China but have had trouble finding a common direction. Including South Korea, a strong democracy, US ally and key high-tech manufacturer, could breathe new life into the group — but only if it is willing to accept that taking a hard line against China will involve forming a military alliance with security guarantees.

Check out our comment feature!

In this episode of FO° Live, FO° Editor-in-Chief Atul Singh speaks with Jaewoo Choo, a professor of Chinese foreign policy in the Department of Chinese Studies at Kyung Hee University, South Korea, and Haruko Satoh, a professor at the Osaka School of International Public Policy, Japan. The matter at hand is South Korea’s potential membership in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or Quad.

The Quad is a grouping of four major Indo-Pacific democracies: the United States, India, Japan and Australia. It was relaunched in 2017 to counterbalance China’s growing influence by promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific through cooperation in security, infrastructure and trade.

Despite this ambition, the Quad faces significant limitations. Critics argue it remains a "talking shop," where dialogue seldom leads to concrete action. Additionally, some members have limited bilateral experience working together, which hampers effective collaboration.

South Korea was notably absent when Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe first conceived the Quad in 2007. Abe’s vision was geographically focused; he pictured a rhombus with its corners in Japan (north), Australia (south), the US (east) and India (west). The idea was to cover ground and secure critical shipping lanes. This left South Korea, located in the middle, outside the equation.

Yet, South Korea has considerable strengths. South Korea and Japan, are the only two economic powers in the region that can plausibly compete with China in building infrastructure rapidly and at scale. South Korea is also a strong defense partner of the US, with a technologically advanced military boasting half a million active personnel — ten times the size of Australia’s. Moreover, South Korea is a leader in global industries like shipbuilding, memory chips and electric vehicle batteries, making it not just a regional player but a global one. Most importantly and obviously, it is a vibrant democracy. For all these reasons, it merits membership in the Quad.

The broader context is the growing security threat posed by China, which seeks to control sea lanes in the East and South China Seas and use its economic power to influence its neighbors. While it makes sense for South Korea to join the Quad, it is unlikely to make provocative moves against China, its largest trading partner and greatest military threat, without a security guarantee from the US. Ultimately, the Quad (or Quint) seems destined to evolve into a military alliance.

[Anton Schauble wrote the first draft of this piece.]

[Note: This FO Talks/FO Live is part of the Osaka School of International Public Policy’s Peace and Human Security in Asia: Toward a Meaningful Japan-Korea Partnership” project supported by the Korea Foundation.]

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO Talks: Hungary Votes for Change — Péter Magyar Ends Viktor Orbán’s 16-Year Rule

April 30, 2026

FO Live: How the Muslim Brotherhood Survives and Thrives Across the Middle East

FO Talks: Why Pakistan Is Mediating Between the US and Iran — and Why Is Israel Not Invited?

April 28, 2026

FO Talks: Pakistan’s Airstrikes in Kabul — Is Taliban Failing to Keep Afghanistan Safe?

April 27, 2026

FO Talks: Why the Iran Ceasefire Solves Nothing in Israel–Hezbollah War

April 26, 2026

FO Talks: Is Europe’s Strategic Amnesia Driving the World Toward Another Global War?

April 25, 2026

FO Talks: The Iran War Has No Clear Endgame

April 24, 2026

FO Live: Wars in Ukraine & Iran — Does Europe Look Weak in 2026?

FO Talks: Viktor Orbán Faces His Toughest Challenge in Hungary’s Defining Vote

April 22, 2026

FO Talks: The American Jury System Explained: Democracy or Illusion?

April 20, 2026

FO Talks: War in Iran: Does the Future of the Middle East Look Bleak?

April 19, 2026

FO Live: How the US–Israel War in Iran Could Redraw Middle East Borders

FO Talks: How Nationalism, the Monarchy and Cambodia Shaped Thailand’s 2026 Election

April 17, 2026

FO Live: Wars Rage in Iran and Ukraine, Where is the United Nations?

FO Talks: From Minneapolis to Kuwait — Welfare Model Under Pressure in the AI Era

April 14, 2026

FO Talks: The $9 Trillion Crisis — AI, Burnout and the Collapse of White Collar Jobs

April 13, 2026

FO Live: Kanwal Sibal Explains Why India Is Europe’s Strategic Alternative to China

April 12, 2026

FO Talks: Is America Building a $1.5 Trillion War Machine to Fight China?

April 11, 2026

FO Talks: Nepal’s Political Earthquake as Gen Z Elevates a Rapper to Power

April 10, 2026

FO Talks: America First to Iran War — Making Sense of Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy

April 09, 2026

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA