When it comes to teaching, there is a common saying: “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” This perception of the profession in themakes it a rather unattractive field. This might explain why public schools have been haunted by staffing problems for decades.
according to Learning Policy Institute. leaving their jobs is detrimental to staff quality at and, ultimately, to the academic performance of students.have suffered from a continued loss of . Every year, 8% of public school leave the profession entirely and another 8% of them move between ,
But why is there a high turnover rate at public schools? According to a study by Geoffrey D. Borman and N. Maritza Dowling, often quit due to dissatisfaction with policies that affect how they do their jobs, low salaries and working conditions.
Will We Wake Up to the Big Tech Distraction Crisis?
In 2001, the focuses on “individual student achievement and overall performance.” Since then, test-based accountability reform has tried to hold responsible for the performance of students in exams. Under pressure to achieve proficiency benchmarks, have reported experiencing burnout and test stress, leading to many quitting their jobs. In low-performing urban , where students tend to score lower grades, the turnover rate is higher than in suburban institutions.Congress passed the , which
Low salaries, which often fail to match the cost of living in urban areas, exacerbate the problem. In Singapore, where the turnover rate is six times lower than in the , salaries were 30% higher than the national wage average, as of 2019. In the , this figure stood at 17%.
As a result, many low-paid jobs to make ends meet. Taking on heavy duties and a second or even third job can lead to fatigue. A tired and distracted is less likely to deliver quality lessons. They may not have extra time to assist underperforming students or communicate well with parents. Such working conditions result in an inequitable distribution of quality. In turn, the achievements of students who require additional assistance in their learning are affected.in the do part-time
The CAN Approach
The high turnover rate needs tackling. To do so, an approach that focuses on compensation, appraisal and networking (CAN) would lead to morestaying in the profession.
First, whenwith marketable skills are unhappy about low salaries that do not fairly compensate for their job stress, it is natural for them to quit. The simple way to fix this is to raise salaries. It is not hard to understand that who are paid a meager amount and are forced to bear test performance responsibilities have intentions to resign.
It is ironic that federal and state governments call for high-quality spent an average of $10,000 to $26,500 to fill vacancies left by each departing . If this cash is instead invested in providing better salaries, would think twice about leaving in the first place. If a tap is dripping, it is wiser to fix the problem rather than let more water go down the drain.but are unwilling to invest in hiring high-quality . The argument against doing so is that there is a lack of available funding. Yet this is not the case. The money is available but has been misplaced. As of 2017, districts
Second,only partially examines the knowledge students obtain at . Test scores are highly volatile and can be affected by a student’s socioeconomic background, English proficiency and even mood on exam days. Using the one-time performance of students is not a suitable way of measuring the quality of teaching. Holding accountable for various factors that could influence grades is unfair.
A more comprehensive appraisal system for teachers is the order of the day. The current model that focuses on test scores needs to be replaced by one that also looks at other important goals. Aside from grades, education helps to equip students with social-emotional learning skills. It is essential for children to understand their own emotions, cope with negative ones and develop empathy with their teacher’s assistance. These life skills are often not tested or even measured, but they make a huge difference in a student’s future. Such an approach would better reflect the effectiveness of teaching.
Third, newly-qualifiedhave the highest turnover rate. Mentoring programs, especially those that match both experienced and novice in the same subject field, are particularly important. Such programs provide networking opportunities to help new integrate into culture and acclimate to teaching protocols.
matter for a child’s . Children spend a considerable amount of time in during their formative years. Teaching quality not only affects a student’s academic achievements but also heavily influences their life outcomes. It is time to stop treating as high-quality cheap labor. High-quality labor is not cheap, and cheap labor is not high quality.
*[Updated on June 6, 2021, at 17:00 GMT.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.