• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Politics
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Modern War: What Hath Technology Wrought?

David Holdridge • Sep 29, 2014

© Shutterstock

Are we on the way to losing the distinction between virtual war and the preciousness of life?

Current calculations are such that America can no longer afford war as it has been waged in the past. Consider the numbers. Take a casualty in Vietnam, for example: At say 40% disabled, a corporal or a lieutenant, 23 years of age who lives to 80 will cost the United States government about $1 million in disability benefits before the veteran passes away, plus the cost of any and all medical care along the way. Not to mention that individual’s reduced productivity for the remainder of his life.

It’s hard to arrive at an exact cost without having more specifics for the wounded person, but if we add up the three costs above — the disability pension, the cost of health care from the Veterans Administration and the loss of productivity — a ball park figure might be around $3 million per casualty. That would be multiplied by 150,000 wounded in Vietnam. Meaning a total cost of about $450 billion for Vietnam veterans alone, which is not far removed from the annual US defense budget.

And then there are other peripherals. The wounded no longer come home in privacy. Nowadays, the coffin is often filmed for national media distribution and, given the complexities of wars overseas and America’s overall diminished appetite for any kind of risk, the body bags soon translate into political opposition for an incumbent administration.

The Other Side of the Equation

Now, let’s consider the other side of the equation. The US has the most sophisticated information and communication technology in the world by an insurmountable margin. It is disrupting every aspect of our sociology through the redefinition of community and through disintermediation of middle actors and mechanisms. It is spiraling and every dollar invested in it is a dollar invested in the sustenance of the hegemon. From time immemorial, the state, which owned the best technology, had an overwhelming advantage over emerging adversaries.

So, you be the judge: flesh and blood soldiers or drones and guided missiles.

What about the receiving end? Well, first off, they (missiles and the bombs) are “smarter.” As someone who has entered cities while they were still smoldering (Baghdad in 1991 and Belgrade in 1999), there is no comparison with the type of carpet bombing that preceded in Korea and Vietnam. Either for soldiers or civilians.

Is it the image of the technician in sandals and khakis, in his air conditioned cubicle in Florida dealing death far away, mostly on poor God forsaken souls who never really know what hit them?
 Seems inhuman. But is it really?

As to congested areas, there are limits (increasingly fewer) for the accuracy of new tech ordnance, but an infantry battalion moving through a town with M-16s kills far more indiscriminately.

If We Have It, We Will Use It

Inexorably, the US Army will increasingly wage all its wars on the back of new technology. And if human life and national treasure are the principal two metrics, then increasingly sophisticated technology appears better for the vanquisher and the vanquished alike.

Why then does this argument send a shiver up my spine? Is it the image of the technician in sandals and khakis, in his air conditioned cubicle in Florida dealing death far away, mostly on poor God forsaken souls who never really know what hit them?
 Seems inhuman. But is it really? Think back on the slaughter at Stalingrad in 1943 and rivers running red with the blood of apostates during Mao’s purges in 1969. 
Still we pause here with questions.

Does this 21st century technology make it easier to pull the trigger, theoretically and actually? Well, not now perhaps, with our Hamlet in the White House. But what about if/when a Dr. Strangelove assumes his place? Or if someone like Vladimir Putin, who is evidently not shuffling with a full deck, provokes catastrophe.
 And then again, technology is fragile. It can go “haywire.” It can get so far out in front of oversight (think NSA) that humans lose all control. William Butler Yeats said it best:
“Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer; / Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold.”

And then, finally, there is the constant imperative that if we have it, we will use it. Without “Live Fire,” the technology gets stale. At peace, you can never get the desired randomness to adapt the military technology successfully. 
In the end, it seems inevitable and vast resources will be used for both offense and defense, for both guided missiles and Iron Domes. And yes, I would bet that eventually the technology will exceed our ability to control it. Or, alternatively, we will become so forgetful of flesh and blood that we will lose the distinction between virtual war and the preciousness of life.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

IndianSummer / Shutterstock.com

Share Story
CategoriesBlog, International Security, North America TagsUnited States, Veterans, War, warfare
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

Read more on this 360° series

World War Two in Numbers: An Interactive Video
Fair Observer • Jun 14, 2015
We Don't Actually Care About the Effects of War
Anna Pivovarchuk & Timothy Lawson • Nov 13, 2014
The Little Book of Kabul: The Everyday Life of Artists
Francesca Recchia & Lorenzo Tugnoli • Nov 07, 2014
“Good” and “Evil” in the Time of War
Anna Pivovarchuk & Yana Korobko • Nov 06, 2014
The Birth of Bangladesh Was a Triumph of Culture Over Religion
Gurusaday Batabyal • Oct 28, 2014
The Myth of the Islamic State And Social Media
Changiz M. Varzi • Oct 27, 2014
Baghdad: Life in the Pitiless City
Landon Shroder • Oct 17, 2014
Understanding War in Afghanistan: Politics, Culture and Social History
Omar Sadr • Oct 14, 2014
Propaganda in World War I: Means, Impacts and Legacies
Ian Cooke • Oct 08, 2014
War Reporters: In Harm’s Way
Anthony Feinstein • Oct 01, 2014
Tibet: A Nonviolent History of War
Carole McGranahan • Sep 25, 2014
Off the Radar: Stealth Conflicts and the Media
Virgil Hawkins • Sep 19, 2014
Soldier Girls: The Battles of Three Women at Home and at War
Helen Thorpe • Sep 12, 2014
Chinatown Gang War
Bill Lee • Sep 10, 2014
Wilfred Burchett: The Atomic Plague
Wilfred Burchett • Aug 27, 2014
Killer Robots: Keeping Control of Autonomous Weapons
Mary Wareham • Aug 21, 2014
Psychological Wounds of Conflict: The Impact of World War One
Edgar Jones • Aug 19, 2014
No One’s Lucky in War: An Interview With Robert King
Anna Pivovarchuk & Robert King • Aug 13, 2014
Russia, Ukraine and World War Three (Part 2/2)
Charles Fiddes Payne • Aug 07, 2014
War: The Hell Where Peace and Laughter Go
Anna Pivovarchuk • Jul 28, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Gaza: No Innocent Victims?
Next PostNext World War I: Why There Will Never Be Another Great War (Part 1/2)
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
Support Our Crowdfunding Campaign

Free media cannot run for free. Unlike social media, we are not using your personal information to sell you advertising. Unlike some publications, our content does not hide behind a paywall. Yet servers, images, newsletters and editorial staff cost money.

We are running a crowdfunding campaign to reach 1,001 monthly donors. Remember, we are a section 501(c)(3) nonprofit in the US and all donations are tax-deductible. Please donate and ask your friends to do so as well.

Support Fair Observer
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 

Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept