• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Joe Biden
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Donald Trump and the Paris Climate Agreement

By Henrik Selin & Adil Najam • Nov 23, 2016
Donald Trump, Donald Trump news, news on Donald Trump, Donald Trump’s views on climate change, climate change denial, climate change, global warming, COP22, COP21, Paris Agreement

Climate change illustration © Filo

What could the rest of the world do if Donald Trump pulls the US out of the Paris Agreement on climate change?

Climate change negotiators from around the world—who recently met at the 22nd session of the Conference of the Parties (COP22) in Marrakech, Morocco—are tasked with putting meaning and action into the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement to bring down global greenhouse gas emissions.

Yet the tone in Marrakech suddenly became subdued as COP22 kicked off. While many conversations remained staunchly defiant, others assumed a funeral-like quality, as national delegates and civil society representatives tried to assess the ramifications of the US presidential election.

Elections can have consequences for global climate change negotiations and the future of the planet.

US President-Elect Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that he does not believe in human-induced climate change. He has argued that climate change is an expensive hoax that was created by the Chinese to make US manufacturing noncompetitive. He has also declared his intent to roll back federal climate change and renewable energy policy. Most importantly, he has loudly declared an intention to “cancel the Paris climate agreement.” (He has since stated in an interview with The New York Times that he has an “open mind” about the accord.)

Some cling to the hope that President Trump will forget pronouncements made by Candidate Trump just as Candidate Trump had ignored the pontifications of Citizen Trump. An important indicator of why this may not be the case is the appointment of Myron Ebell as head of the transition team for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Ebell, also a frontrunner to be appointed as head of the EPA, is an outspoken climate change denier who flat out rejects the Paris Agreement as unconstitutional.

Notwithstanding the mechanics of officially “leaving” the Paris Agreement—which stipulate a four-year process—how should the rest of the world respond if the Trump administration were to formally or informally disengage from the Paris Agreement?

These authors think there are at least four ways in which things can unfold.

Scenario 1: Walk Out With the US

If the Trump administration decides to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, then other major economies that are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will have justification to do the same. This is de facto what happened with the 1997 Kyoto Protocol once it became clear that the US would not ratify and was not serious about its implementation.

Not least because the Paris Agreement came together as a result of much diplomatic leadership by the Obama administration, other countries would feel a legitimate sense of anger and disappointment toward the United States if it were to walk away from the agreement.

Whether the walkout is a formal withdrawal from the agreement or an informal abdication from its responsibilities, the Paris Agreement would be effectively doomed as signatories fail to meet pledges to reduce country emissions made in Paris. The implication of such a scenario is that the UNFCCC negotiation process could just wither away, and critical agreed-upon temperature goals would slip further out of reach.

Embed from Getty Images

Scenario 2: Kick the US Out

As the world’s largest economy, although not by the margins it once was, and the world’s largest emitter of CO2, the US remains central to the enterprise of curtailing global climate change, but arguably is no longer as indispensable as it once was.

Such a rationale and the anger that would be triggered by a US walk-out of the Paris Agreement, particularly amongst the European Union (EU) and China, could induce the parties that remain serious about the agreement to adopt a retaliatory posture. While it would be unprecedented, countries could decide that a US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement should have real consequences for US involvement and participation in the United Nations (UN) climate change process.

If they were to do so, they would be taking a cue straight out of Trump’s book, The Art of the Deal, and its key dictums of “fighting back very hard” and “using every leverage.” As Trump puts it in his book: “The worst thing you can possibly do [is to] seem desperate … That makes the other guy smell blood, and then you’re dead.”

There has already been at least one suggestion that a US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement should be met with not just forcing the US out of all global climate arrangements, but imposing “economic sanctions in the face of this [Trump’s] treaty-shredding lawlessness.”

Scenario 3: Wait it Out

Even if a Trump administration is compelled to take early and visible action on the Paris Agreement to appease its political base, such action could be temporary—either because the reality of governance will eventually trump the necessity of politicking, or because the next election in four years could unseat the Trump administration.

Reasoning along such lines could compel the other countries to simply wait out any tantrums of the Trump administration. Essentially, this would mean ignoring US theatrics in the hope that time will bring either sanity or a different president to the White House who would steer the US back into support of the Paris provisions.

Other major powers, especially China, may also view this as an opportunity to assume international political and environmental leadership without fully igniting the wrath of a Trump White House by actively pushing the US aside. Then the result could be a de facto sidelining of the United States as an essential player in global climate change politics, at least for a while.

Click here to join our community of more than 1,900 contributors and publish your perspective

Subscribe to Newsletter

Follow Us

Scenario 4: Engage the US

Unseemly as Donald Trump may seem to many countries on many levels, it is not easy—maybe not even possible—to ignore or sideline the world’s largest economy and still the only real superpower on the planet. On all sorts of international issues, the world will have to learn to engage President Trump. This could also be the case for climate change.

During the George W. Bush administration, other major actors kept negotiating with the United States even after its unequivocal rejection of the Kyoto Protocol. Back then, other countries believed that the importance of the US as both a leading political and economic power and greenhouse gas emitter was so great it was better to keep it inside the UNFCCC process.

Such engagement with the Trump administration can take place both through multilateral channels and in bilateral talks, mainly with China and the EU. The question would be whether President Trump would be willing to remain engaged, and on what terms.

What Should the World Do?

Perhaps it is wise for politicians to remain quiet for now. It would not be wise, however, for the world to not start preparing for different scenarios. The next COP does not meet until November 2017 in Asia. By then it may well be too late to think about options, probably from a negotiation perspective and certainly from the perspective of the planet’s health.

*[An earlier version of this article was originally published by The Conversation.] The Conversation

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Filo

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Environment, North America, Politics Tagsclimate change, Climate change denial, COP21, COP22, Donald Trump, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump’s views on climate change, global warming, news on Donald Trump, Paris Agreement
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

No Climate Justice Without Gender Justice
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Nov 18, 2016
Investing in the Fight Against Climate Change
By Vasundhara Saravade • Nov 08, 2016
Implementing Climate Change Policies
By Sohara Mehroze Shachi • Mar 18, 2016
Estonian Involvement Can Decide Success of Energy Transition
By Sören Tiitsmann • Mar 02, 2016
US Trade Policy Clouds Climate Prospects
By Veena Trehan • Mar 01, 2016
Climate Change and the Distrust of Authority
By Arek Sinanian • Feb 22, 2016
The Rejection of Climate Change
By Arek Sinanian • Jan 24, 2016
The Paris Climate Deal and What It Means for ASEAN
By Jed Alegado • Dec 17, 2015
Climate Deal Will Only Stick If It’s Just
By Atul Singh • Dec 15, 2015
Polar Bear and the Poor Miss Out in Paris
By Chitra Subramaniam • Dec 14, 2015
Why Do Some People Reject Climate Change?
By Arek Sinanian • Dec 14, 2015
Indigenous Women: Respect Our Knowledge and Tradition
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 13, 2015
We Must Fight Climate Change to Win the War on Terror
By Vasundhara Saravade • Dec 12, 2015
Citizens Can Play Active Role in Urban Biodiversity
By Pari Trivedi • Dec 11, 2015
Corporate Sponsors of Climate Conference Raise Eyebrows
By Anton Jaekel • Dec 11, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Climate-change2.jpg
Climate Talks Show Lack of Female Representation
By Riddhima Yadav • Dec 10, 2015
City Nature is a Gateway for Climate Activism
By Charlotte Flechet • Dec 10, 2015
A Love Letter From #EarthToParis… Narrated by Morgan Freeman
By Fair Observer • Dec 08, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Climate-Change1.jpg
How COP21 Will Impact on the SDGs
By David Hulme • Dec 05, 2015
Arab Unity Over Climate Change Presents an Opportunity
By Ali Mohamed Ahmed • Dec 05, 2015
Youth Are Finding Solutions to Climate Change
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 04, 2015
Climate Change: A Clear and Present Danger
By Atul Singh • Dec 02, 2015
Empowering Women is Part of the Climate Solution
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 02, 2015
‪#EarthToParis: This is NOT About Jack Black‬
By Fair Observer • Nov 30, 2015
What Do Past Patterns of Climate Change Tell Us?
By Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective • Nov 30, 2015
Sustainable Development is a Lie
By Derrick Jensen • Nov 19, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Climate-Change.jpg
Climate Change is No Laughing Matter
By Fair Observer • Nov 09, 2015
African Women Innovate to Battle Climate Change
By Fair Observer • Oct 14, 2015

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Cuba is Frozen in Time, But That’s About to Change
Next PostNext Is Putin Really as Foolish as We Are?
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept