• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Joe Biden
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Polar Bear and the Poor Miss Out in Paris

By Chitra Subramaniam • Dec 14, 2015
Ban Ki-moon

© Shutterstock

A shaky structure and vague promises have seen the light of day following the climate conference in Paris. Chitra Subramaniam explains.

The very talented Swiss artist Patrick Chapatte’s 2006 cartoon to mark the start of the international climate talks in Nairobi in November 2006 could well have been repeated for the recently concluded climate talks in Paris. Nobody is quite sure what was achieved, but everyone is relieved that talks didn’t crash. All the right words are in. The treaty talks of finance and adaptation, damage and loss, stocktaking, technology, emission reduction and market mechanisms, but the sum of the parts has led to more confusion and suspicion, not confidence.

The good news is that the world now has a freshly minted climate change deal where 196 countries have agreed to keep the rise of global temperature well below 2 degrees Celsius by the turn of the century. The mythical Eiffel Tower in Paris lit up with 1.5 degrees spangled across. Leaders also agreed to ensure that their countries would peak their emissions swiftly so that collectively they could ensure that net greenhouse gas emissions would return to zero.

The less good news: The world is no closer to saving itself from the disastrous effects of climate change than it was two weeks ago because the 31-page treaty is low on specifics. For example, it speaks of rolling out $100 billion 2020 onward, but fails to mention what, why and, above all, who should pay. It also has a glaring untruth written all over it: There is no recognition of the historical responsibility for pollution.

So, at the very best, the world has sketched itself a new text on which to pin future hopes and expect early disappointments. At worst, the marathon talks that lasted for two weeks showed bad blood, dishonesty and pressure tactics profiling once again that lack of trust and good faith is the bane of multilateral negotiations and diplomacy.

What is the immediate take-away for India?

There are those who believe that as long as fossil fuels remain the cheapest form of energy, they will be used and for now, coal is India’s best option. But another, more interesting scenario has also emerged from the way many say India strategically and politically prevented the talks from collapsing.

How much of that is true, the future will tell, but New Delhi is within grasping distance of the benefits of swiftly moving away from carbon by playing its large domestic market potential and ambition to grow at double digits. Show us the money and we will show you the market is an interesting spot to be.

Paris was supposed to end fragility—fragility of poor people, the world’s forest and water resources and food supply chains. Developing countries looked to finance and resources to mitigate damage and adapt to new technologies, so as to not repeat the errors of rich nations.

Francois Hollande and Narendra Modi

Francois Hollande and Narendra Modi © Shutterstock

But here’s the flaw. The new treaty is blind to historical responsibility on which compensation hinges, thus placing all countries on par in their future efforts to prevent global warming. One report predicts that 50% of economic growth between 2010 and 2015 will come from some 440 cities in emerging markets—China, India and Africa.

What will be the role of clean technology in their trajectories, and how can they access, finance or develop this?

The climate treaty is weak on specifics and has no road map—hence it is not a reliable ally. Developing countries also hoped Paris would address rising sea levels, soaring temperatures and increasing pressure on land and water, among other issues. Instead, they returned with a text that says the damage to climate “does not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation.” This means that developing countries will have to scrounge around for their right to assistance in a spirit of unhealthy competition and suspicion.

Is All Lost?

The other problem profiled in Paris was science and what role it was to play to influence policymakers, industrialists, civil society and lawmakers. While 2 degrees Celsius was bandied about months before the final negotiations, a straight cause and effect relationship between carbon emissions and future global warming remains elusive. In fact, the relationship is imprecise, leading to fears that this will further dilute any talk of compensation and liability.

The cruelest cut for developing countries was perhaps the fact that the failure to pin compensation was seen as a means to not address the issue at all. For all the back thumping and table pounding in Paris, little action is expected before 2020. Plenty of opportunities exist for governments to change the text and for national parliaments to not ratify any or all of the commitments.

What next?

All is not lost. There is now a super-structure available to the world to work on. As climate change continues to worsen and affects millions of lives, it is people who will now be demanding action of their governments. The pollution in Delhi and the floods in Chennai and the resultant public anger is where hope lies. Voters will increasingly force governments to come up with solutions in the true spirit of democracy and transparency.

As for the United Nations, the most important question it needs to answer as it turns 70 is this: If the comity of nations cannot come to a common understanding about what are human rights, how can it give itself the power to police the world’s resources?

If only the polar bear could speak and the world’s poor would be heard, what would they say?

*[This article was originally published by The News Minute.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Frederic Legrand – COMEO / Shutterstock.com


Fair Observer - World News, Politics, Economics, Business and CultureWe bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible. Join over 400 people to become a donor or you could choose to be a sponsor.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Environment, Europe, Global Change Tagsclimate change, COP21, Earth to Paris, United Nations
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

Donald Trump and the Paris Climate Agreement
By Henrik Selin & Adil Najam • Nov 23, 2016
No Climate Justice Without Gender Justice
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Nov 18, 2016
Investing in the Fight Against Climate Change
By Vasundhara Saravade • Nov 08, 2016
Implementing Climate Change Policies
By Sohara Mehroze Shachi • Mar 18, 2016
Estonian Involvement Can Decide Success of Energy Transition
By Sören Tiitsmann • Mar 02, 2016
US Trade Policy Clouds Climate Prospects
By Veena Trehan • Mar 01, 2016
Climate Change and the Distrust of Authority
By Arek Sinanian • Feb 22, 2016
The Rejection of Climate Change
By Arek Sinanian • Jan 24, 2016
The Paris Climate Deal and What It Means for ASEAN
By Jed Alegado • Dec 17, 2015
Climate Deal Will Only Stick If It’s Just
By Atul Singh • Dec 15, 2015
Why Do Some People Reject Climate Change?
By Arek Sinanian • Dec 14, 2015
Indigenous Women: Respect Our Knowledge and Tradition
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 13, 2015
We Must Fight Climate Change to Win the War on Terror
By Vasundhara Saravade • Dec 12, 2015
Citizens Can Play Active Role in Urban Biodiversity
By Pari Trivedi • Dec 11, 2015
Corporate Sponsors of Climate Conference Raise Eyebrows
By Anton Jaekel • Dec 11, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Climate-change2.jpg
Climate Talks Show Lack of Female Representation
By Riddhima Yadav • Dec 10, 2015
City Nature is a Gateway for Climate Activism
By Charlotte Flechet • Dec 10, 2015
A Love Letter From #EarthToParis… Narrated by Morgan Freeman
By Fair Observer • Dec 08, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Climate-Change1.jpg
How COP21 Will Impact on the SDGs
By David Hulme • Dec 05, 2015
Arab Unity Over Climate Change Presents an Opportunity
By Ali Mohamed Ahmed • Dec 05, 2015
Youth Are Finding Solutions to Climate Change
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 04, 2015
Climate Change: A Clear and Present Danger
By Atul Singh • Dec 02, 2015
Empowering Women is Part of the Climate Solution
By Renee Juliene Karunungan • Dec 02, 2015
‪#EarthToParis: This is NOT About Jack Black‬
By Fair Observer • Nov 30, 2015
What Do Past Patterns of Climate Change Tell Us?
By Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective • Nov 30, 2015
Sustainable Development is a Lie
By Derrick Jensen • Nov 19, 2015
/nas/wp/www/sites/fairobserver/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Climate-Change.jpg
Climate Change is No Laughing Matter
By Fair Observer • Nov 09, 2015
African Women Innovate to Battle Climate Change
By Fair Observer • Oct 14, 2015

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Cuba is Frozen in Time, But That’s About to Change
Next PostNext Is Putin Really as Foolish as We Are?
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept