The Americans call the five-day halt to Turkey’s military incursion into northern Syria a ceasefire, while the Turks prefer to call it a pause. The Kurds call the incursion something else. For them, and for American soldiers who fought with them in the war against the Islamic State (IS), as well as for many US politicians on both sides of the House, it is quite simply a betrayal.
Call it what you will, but it is surely not an accident that the end of the five days, 22 October, coincides with a meeting between the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in Sochi. Here, Putin can put the finishing touches on his latest diplomatic coup in the Middle East, one that saw American troops pulling out in a confused retreat after their president and commander-in-chief gave a thumbs up to Erdogan to move into Syria in a phone call.
In a subsequent effort to justify his decision, Donald Trump said this: “They had terrorists, they had a lot of people in there they couldn’t have … and they had to have it cleaned out.” He later compared the assault to a couple of kids fighting it out in the school yard. “Sometimes,” proffered the self-proclaimed genius of foreign policy, “you have to let them fight, then you pull them apart.”
Meanwhile, Russian media was gleefully screening videos of its forces taking control of a hastily abandoned US base. One has to go back to the fall of Saigon and scenes of American helicopters being pushed into the sea off the decks of US warships to find a comparable image of the military humiliation of the world’s most powerfully armed nation.
Efforts to portray Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s journey to Ankara to secure a ceasefire (or a pause) as some sort of diplomatic win were almost immediately undercut by reports that the Turks were continuing their offensive in the border town of Ras al-Ayn, a charge Ankara unsurprisingly denied. In any event, President Erdogan can take great satisfaction in setting himself up as the leader who defied the might of America. And he is well along the road to giving the Kurds a bloody nose while establishing a deep buffer zone in Syrian territory that, with the approval of the US, will be patrolled and policed by Turkish soldiers.
But it is Vladimir Putin who can take the greatest pleasure from this latest American debacle in the region. He can position himself as the peacemaker and the pragmatist who, unlike Donald Trump, hasn’t buckled and walked away from the Middle East at its great hour of need. Just how easily he has filled the vacuum left by the American president was shown by his triumphal visits to Riyadh and Abu Dhabi in the wake of the Turkish incursion. He was feted like a modern-day czar, signed trade deals and talked the language of relationships and trust.
Putin was, without mentioning Trump, making the point to his Saudi and Emirati hosts that Russia was a friend on whom they could rely. He was not going to treat them as a convenient cash cow for weapons sales, nor make unreasonable demands that they hold down the price of oil. Nor would he ever, as Trump has repeatedly done, mock the aged and frail Saudi King Salman.
No, the Russian leader was not interested in short-term transactional deal-making which brought benefits to one side whilst exploiting and insulting the other. Rather, Vladimir Putin, the old spymaster, was saying he was in the business of establishing a long-term relationship based on shared values. In that regard he holds both Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince, and Mohammed bin Zayed, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, as valuable and valued assets to be listened to and treated with respect.
Quid Pro Quo
Donald Trump, on the other hand, sees the Saudis in particular only through the lens of quid pro quo. So, for example, while he was precipitously pulling troops out of northern Syria, he was sending soldiers to Saudi Arabia in direct and open contradiction to his stated policy to get the US out of the Middle East. But that, it seems, was okay because “they buy hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of merchandise from us, not only military equipment. In military equipment, about $110 billion. It’s millions of jobs.” And, the great dealmaker was quick to add, “But are you ready? Saudi Arabia, at my request, has agreed to pay us for everything we’re doing.”
Beyond the fact that the Saudis have been buying American military hardware for decades, it will be galling for them to have so publicly and baldly stated that their nervousness about the Iranians has, according to the president’s way of thinking, required them to buy in American troops. That the custodians of Islam’s two holiest sites need foreign non-Islamic soldiers to protect them is, among other things, a massive propaganda gift to IS and al-Qaeda.
True, Putin did tease the Saudis that had they had the Russian S-400 missile defense system, the Saudi Aramco attack could have been thwarted. But teasing is not a humiliation, and what Mohammed bin Salman is now discovering is that Trump enjoys humiliating America’s friends and allies. The young prince is nothing if not proud, a quality that Putin has shrewdly gauged and is effectively deploying. Equally shrewdly he has adroitly turned Trump’s latest foreign blunder with the Turks to his advantage. Small wonder, then, that on October 15 Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic House Speaker, said that “All roads seem to lead to Putin with the President, isn’t it so?”
*[This article was originally published by Gulf House.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.