• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Joe Biden
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Lessons from Iraq: Hold “Big Media” Accountable

By Al-Sharif Nassef • Apr 08, 2013

American media failed to fulfill its role during the lead-up to the American invasion of Iraq. Al-Sharif Nassef argues that American “Big Media” must be held accountable for its part in selling the Bush administration’s Iraq war agenda.

Too often “Big Media” shies away from the more trialing debates that make us challenge the status quo or rethink popularly accepted narratives. Either the media’s analytical lens is waning, or it too is easily duped by our government administrations’ agendas. Either way, with its lack of skepticism, the American mass media failed its duty to the American public, as it helped the Bush administration sell the Iraq war.

Now, 10 years after Bush’s invasion of Iraq, an ugly reality stares us squarely in the eyes: upwards of a hundred-fifty-thousand dead Iraqi civilians, nearly five thousand dead American troops, countless wounded and displaced, and trillions of American tax dollars down the drain. Not to mention the lack of a single weapon of mass destruction found or even meek whisper of Saddam Hussein’s involvement in the planning of 9/11. The war’s bleak aftermath leaves the conscientious American pondering: Who should be held responsible for the war-crime-ridden fiasco that our country’s corporate-military elite led us headstrong into?”

This article’s purpose is not to place blame on a particular media entity over another. Or even to shed light on the corporate influence that spreads its tentacles deep throughout the American media landscape – think Time Warner’s acquisition of Huffington Post, or the Comcast-NBC Universal charade. Rather, it is a blast against a “Big Media” system that failed its duty of accountability to America and in doing so revealed its own lack of integrity. “Big Media” sold out its coverage and shirked away from the truth: with war came more “news” and higher ratings. Media sensationalized, even fabricated, security threats to keep Americans glued to their televisions, as the Pentagon and the industrial conglomerate that profits from its massive expenditures prepared for battle.

Most remember the Iraq war drum, its beats harmonized seamlessly with the post 9/11 American fear mantra. It was mainstream media’s hype behind the war, whose pre-war airtime was packed with scores of Bush administration government officials and their war-selling talking points, or with interviews of Bush’s hawkish business cronies, dubbed “political experts,” that helped the administration sell us on a false war.

Take Richard Perle for instance, a top neoconservative system-ite who headed the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board from 2001 to 2003 before the Iraq war. He was one of many Bush Administration officials who made their rounds on the mass media megaphones of every major American network and pitched the Iraq war to a terrified America with the ever-spooky buzzwords of “WMDs,” “terrorism,” and “axis of evil.”

Rarely, if ever was there mention in his interviews that Iraq appeared on Pearl’s agenda as early as 1996 when he led a study group for Benjamin Netanyahu, then prime minister of Israel, that placed the removal of Saddam Hussein as a key Israeli strategic objective.

Where were questions from the mass media that highlighted Perle’s efforts in spearheading the neoconservative Project for the New American Century, which in 1998 drafted a letter to Bill Clinton urging him to invade Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein with none other than fellow Bush administration neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz, John Elliot Abrams, and John Bolton as cosigners? The mass media cowered before the masses, guessing that they could lose viewership if they dared to ask tough questions to President Bush or his officials, lest being viewed as unpatriotic or un-American whilst “America Under Attack” blazoned the bottom half of the screen of major news station. Surely many Americans will remember the sentiment of those times.

They may have simply been bad at their job. Or, the mass media, capitalizing on America’s renewed interest in broadcast journalism, failed to challenge the motives behind the war drum narrative that America got so used to hearing. It failed to ask the tough questions that could have discredited the sales pitch Americans were forced to buy into. It failed to be accountable.

This is not to say that serious journalism outside the mainstream did not occasionally occur. It was just usually too little, too late. For example, the New Yorker exposed Richard Perle’s ulterior motives for propagating the Iraq war. Just days before the Iraq invasion, Seymour Hersh, a journalist for the New Yorker, published an exposé on Perle, revealing his role in establishing Trireme Partners L.P. The firm, established literally the month after 9/11 when the Iraq war drumming began, specialized in homeland security and defense contracts—an industry poised only to gain monetarily from an American war. The conflict of interest suggested by the article prompted an internal investigation and eventually led Pearle to resign. However, these questions were asked too late. The American public had already been sold. Days after Perle’s resignation, the United States invaded Iraq.

“Big Media” made the average American believe that the war game in Iraq was about “keeping America free.” We were beguiled into thinking that if we did not bomb Baghdad into oblivion, nothing would prevent Saddam Hussein from handing over weapons of mass destruction to the “terrorists.” Yet, it is exactly this media-painted archetype of the Muslim “boogeymen”—those bearded terrorists who hate America for being “free”—that permeated the minds of Americans to create the very Islamophobic sentiment and sense of insecurity that directly abetted the Bush administration’s war.

“Big Media” exaggerated the divisions of “us” and “them.” It unabashedly bought into the post-9/11 fear-mongering system, serving as a pedestal for the Department of Homeland Security’s artificial color changing scheme that kept Americans on edge. It blinded America’s sense of reason and humanity and made us succumb to the evils of fear.

The mass media must be held accountable for the messages it relays. Never again can Americans stand by, as “Big Media” is used as a propaganda tool for the government’s agendas forayed into the forefront of the American consciousness. We, as Americans, must learn to question everything. We must refuse to be fooled again and refuse to let the media paint Iran as another Iraq.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, International Security, Middle East & North Africa, Politics TagsIraq, Media, Richard Perle, War
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

Don't Blame the Iraq Debacle on the Israel Lobby (Part 2/2)
By Stephen Zunes • May 14, 2013
Don't Blame the Iraq Debacle on the Israel Lobby (Part 1/2)
By Stephen Zunes • May 06, 2013
Letter From Kut
By Tall Mohammad • Apr 07, 2013
The War in Iraq Was Won
By Brandon Scott • Mar 20, 2013
Iraqi Youth: The Best Post-War Investment?
By Yasmeen Sami Alamiri • Mar 20, 2013
Iraq, Syria and the "12th Imam"
By Landon Shroder • Aug 10, 2012
Iraq: The Aftermath
By Ronia Dubbaneh • Mar 19, 2012
America's Withdrawal From Iraq Was Never An Option
By Zaid Al-Atrackchi • Jan 19, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious The Arab Uprisings: A Brief Look
Next PostNext Monetarist Dogma: Defunct Economics
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept