Mexico: Unrest Against Fuel Price Hike Risks Sentiment Toward IOCs

Mexico news, Mexico oil industry, Pemex, Enrique Peña Nieto, international oil companies news, Mexican news, Gulf of Mexico, gasoline prices news, oil subsidies, Current world news headlines

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico © IanMcD

January 17, 2017 14:45 EDT

The Mexican government’s increase of fuel prices has provoked a wave of unrest targeting petrol facilities across the country.

In Mexico, the removal of subsidies and deregulation of prices have seen fuel costs go up 14-20% since January 1, sparking a wave of nationwide unrest involving wide sections of society. The protests have seen blockades of storage terminals and fuel stations, the obstruction of key transportation routes, and the looting of service stations and other commercial establishments. In the first week of the protests, some 1,500 people were detained, six were killed, and Mexico’s retail association reported losses of more than $2.4 million from looting.

As a result of fuel terminal blockades, national oil company Pemex reported critical shortages of fuel in Mexicali city on January 10, and in the states of Chihuahua, Durango, Morelos and Baja California from January 3. High levels of unrest are set to continue this month with some of Mexico’s largest trade unions planning demonstrations on January 26 and 31. Farmers and campesino groups intend to block highways during a strike on January 30, raising the prospect of clashes with security forces.

The continuation of protests this month will, therefore, continue to disrupt access to fuel and could have a major impact on supply chains and logistics for companies operating in Mexico.

Outlook in Mexico

Despite the scale of unrest, President Enrique Peña Nieto is unlikely to reverse the price increase. On January 4, Nieto responded to the protests saying the liberalization of fuel prices was a difficult but necessary measure to reflect the economic pressures from the lower price of oil since 2014, and that not raising prices would cause a long-term threat to economic stability. Finance Minister Jose Antonio Meade estimated that continued fuel subsidies would have cost $9.2 billion in 2017.

In a signal of its commitment to maintaining the price increase, on January 9 the government announced it had reached an agreement with businesses and union leaders to stabilize the price of staple goods, cut salaries of senior government officials, and encouraged capital repatriation in a bid to offset the impact of the fuel price liberalization.

The capability of opposition groups to sustain the same momentum behind protests throughout the year remains unclear. Despite a large social media following under the “no al gasolinazo” umbrella, the protests have so far been organized by disparate groups, including labor and transport unions, farming and student groups. They have remained largely local in nature with limited cooperation. Protests against the 2013 energy reforms, which at their peak involved thousands of people in Mexico City, ultimately failed to achieve cohesion between groups and subsequently lost momentum.

Key to the strength and duration of unrest will be the ability of leaders of unions and social movements, as well as leftist political parties National Regeneration Movement (Morena) and Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), to lead unified action against the measure. On January 9, PRD Secretary-General Beatriz Mojica said its members in congress will work to scrap the price hike and revise the 2013 energy reforms, illustrating parties’ efforts to associate the recent price increase with the government’s wider sector reforms.

Further increases in the fuel price as a result of a rise in international oil and gas prices could spur additional unrest. The government will determine price ceilings on a bi-weekly basis from February 3 and daily from February 18, before wider deregulation of the price is rolled out across 2017, starting with Baja California and Sonora on March 30. Unrest could also intensify if the fuel price rise triggers inflation and corresponding increases in the prices of transportation, electricity and consumer goods. Citibanamex has predicted inflation will surge beyond 4.6% in 2017.

Political repercussions

The fuel price rise further damages the prospects of re-election for Nieto’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in 2018. The protests come as the government is already suffering low approval ratings due to a series of past corruption scandals, failure to tackle violence from organized crime and disappointing economic growth.

There is also considerable uncertainty in Mexico City over the impact of US President-Elect Donald Trump, who assumes office on January 20. The Mexican peso hit an all-time low against the dollar in January amid fears that a Trump administration will damage trade relations with Mexico following a series of hostile statements from the president-elect and pressure on international companies to base manufacturing in the US, rather than its southern neighbor.

donate to nonprofit media organizationsPoor results in gubernatorial elections in four states in June 2017, including the historical PRI stronghold Mexico state, threaten to further undermine the government’s position during its last year in office.

The unrest could boost the popularity of Morena’s Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who has attributed the price hike to wider energy sector reforms begun in 2013. Twice presidential runner-up, Obrador is a current frontrunner to win the 2018 presidential election on a leftist, populist platform, and he has pledged to reverse the energy sector liberalization introduced under the PRI and revoke contracts already signed by international oil companies (IOC).

Although a reversal of the energy reforms would face congressional obstacles, even in the event of an Obrador victory, political momentum and the direction of public sentiment will alarm some IOCs investing in the Mexican market this year. Recent unrest has re-politicized the 2013 liberalization reforms and, if protests are maintained, could see companies face some hostility from social groups or trade unions.

*[This article is based on a report by Protection Group International.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: IanMcD

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member