• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • US Election
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

The G20 Needs to Show Leadership to Fight COVID-19

The G20 convened via teleconference to discuss the coronavirus pandemic and the economic impact. But what should be done?
By John Bruton • Mar 30, 2020
G20 summit, G20 coronavirus, G20 COVID-19 pandemic, G20 economic crash, global financial crisis, coronavirus pandemic, COVID-19 pandemic, economics news, global economy, John Bruton

The G20 Summit in Hamburg on 7/8/2017. © Gil Corzo / Shutterstock

It is welcome news that the G20, representing the world’s biggest economies and 90% of global GDP, met via teleconference on March 26 to discuss the health and economic crisis caused by the novel coronavirus, which leads to the COVID-19 disease. It has been obvious for several weeks that coordinated international action was needed.

Given that the G20 was founded in order to deal with crises — particularly the global financial crisis of 2007-08 — it is amazing that it has taken the Saudi presidency of the G20 so long to convene a meeting. The Saudis were pressed into doing so by India.


One Antidote to Coronavirus: More Multilateralism

READ MORE


In 2008, when the G20 first convened, there was a reasonable relationship between the two biggest world powers, the US and China. Gordon Brown of the UK was the chair, and a substantial program of action was agreed and implemented. The financial stability board was set up, and a global set of actions to stabilize banks was agreed and put into motion. China led the way in stimulating its economy through infrastructure spending, and this helped to get the global economy going again. Germany and Europe benefited from this through exports.

Now that lives, not just livelihoods, are at stake, an even more vigorous program of action is needed from the G20. The US and China must stop sniping at one another and start cooperating. Washington and Beijing coming together to work on this global threat would give hope to the world.

When the COVID-19 crisis broke out in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019, Japan set a good example that the US might now follow. Japan sent protective equipment to Wuhan, and Japanese MPs donated part of their salaries to the virus containment efforts in China. This was a remarkable gesture in light of the previous public hostility between these countries, which dates back to World War II.

The WHO and Trade

The COVID-19 crisis has revealed how much we all depend on the chronically-underfunded World Health Organization (WHO). In recent budgetary proposals, the White House actually proposed halving the US contribution to the WHO. Instead, all G20 members should agree to double their contributions to the organization.

Embed from Getty Images

Trade barriers, many of them recently enforced, are also hindering efforts to save lives. John W.H. Denton, the secretary-general of the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris, wrote in the Financial Times that “the recent escalation of trade barriers is now wreaking havoc in key medical supply chains.” For example, restrictions on the export of life-saving equipment — including masks, test kits, disinfectants and ventilators — have been introduced by some countries. Global trade in test kits is worth $186 billion and that in disinfectants is around $308 billion.

The Global Trade Alert team in Switzerland says that damaging export bans have been introduced by a number of countries, including Bulgaria, France, India, the UK, South Korea and even by Saudi Arabia itself. In the case of ventilators, export restrictions would be particularly damaging. In Africa, there is no firm that is capable of manufacturing ventilators, while there is only one throughout Latin America. Even the countries that do have manufacturing capacity will have to import some components. Even soap and disinfectants have to be imported by most countries. There are 78 countries that impose tariffs on soap and 23 nations place tariffs on disinfectants. This is crazy under the present circumstances.

The G20 should decide that all barriers to trade in goods, including soap, which the World Customs Organization (WCO) has said is critical to fighting the coronavirus, should be lifted straight away. The European Union should abolish its own export authorization system for ventilators as it will slow down production and cost lives, especially in the poorest countries of the world.

EU Action

The G20 also needs to consider the long-term economic effect of the shutdown in global economic activity. Big countries with big tax bases can protect themselves and their firms. Germany has introduced a huge aid package for German firms. Yet an Italian company that produces the same product as a German one may not receive the same aid as its German competitor, and this sort of issue could destroy the level playing field of the EU single market.

No country derives as much benefit proportionately as Ireland does from the existence of a fair and open single market in the European Union. So, Ireland should back EU coordination of business support to ensure that all firms — whether from big or small countries — can compete fairly. 

The European Central Bank has taken welcome steps to help Italy and other heavily indebted countries affected by the coronavirus pandemic to borrow at reasonable interest rates. But that simply adds to their debts. Collective EU action, financed by collective EU borrowing, in support of particular health-related spending should be undertaken. At the moment, the union can neither raise taxes nor borrow, and that means it is unable to cope with crises like this one.

There are three steps that should be considered. First, there should be an immediate elimination of all tariffs and restrictions on the export or import of goods identified by the WCO as vital to fighting COVID-19. Second, a mutual assistance program to help countries with the greatest shortage of equipment and intensive care beds should be launched. Finally, medical staff who have been tested should be exempt from immigration restrictions to allow them to go where they are needed most.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Coronavirus, Economics, Europe, Europe News, Health, Quick read, Science, World Leaders News, World News Tagscoronavirus pandemic, COVID-19 pandemic, Economics news, G20 coronavirus, G20 COVID-19 pandemic, G20 economic crash, g20 summit, Global Economy, Global Financial Crisis, John Bruton
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

What Has COVID-19 Done to Small Businesses?
By Vinay Subramanian • Jul 27, 2020
How Will COVID-19 Impact Our Economy?
By Atul Singh • Jun 26, 2020
COVID-19 Puts the Brakes on the “World’s Fastest City”
By Bill Law • Jun 15, 2020
Is the COVID-19 Bailout Another Scam on American Taxpayers?
By Atul Singh & Ti Ngo • Jun 07, 2020
The New Normal Is Nothing New
By Jean AbiNader • Jun 05, 2020
The Challenges Facing the Eurozone
By Pawel Tokarski • Jun 01, 2020
Morocco Sets Out a Post-Coronavirus Recovery Strategy
By Jean AbiNader • May 28, 2020
Central Europe Tiptoes Into the New World After Coronavirus
By Sona Muzikarova • May 21, 2020
Saudi Geopolitics Amid COVID-19 and the Oil Crisis
By Theodore Karasik & Alexander Jalil • May 15, 2020
Should We Reopen the Economy?
By John Feffer • May 15, 2020
Indonesia-UAE Relations Strengthen Amid COVID-19
By Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat & Theodore Karasik • May 12, 2020
What Will Post-Pandemic Economics Look Like?
By John Feffer • May 01, 2020
Coronavirus Makes Indonesians Get Online
By Dikanaya Tarahita & Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat • Apr 29, 2020
Fintech: Embracing the Digital Age in the Time of Social Distancing
By Glenn Ojeda Vega & German Peinado Delgado • Apr 28, 2020
Will COVID-19 Change Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia?
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 and Low Oil Prices Threaten to Leave Saudi Arabia With Empty Hands
By Bill Law • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 Is a Wake-Up Call on the Shortcomings of Globalization
By Hans-Georg Betz • Apr 23, 2020
How the Middle East Reacts to the Coronavirus Pandemic
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 14, 2020
Will the EU Survive the Coronavirus?
By John Feffer • Apr 10, 2020
Looking for a New Chapter in Central Eastern Europe
By Sona Muzikarova • Apr 02, 2020
COVID-19 Makes Johnson and Trump Reject Thatcher and Reagan
By Atul Singh • Mar 31, 2020
COVID-19: Will We Learn the Lessons?
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 27, 2020
How Coronavirus Is Impacting Small Businesses
By Beau Peters • Mar 25, 2020
The COVID-19 Crisis Will Change Policymaking and Business
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 23, 2020
COVID-19 Outbreak Takes the Recession Debate to Brand New Territory
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 19, 2020
Will Coronavirus Break the Financial Market's Hubris?
By Daniel Wagner & Jonathan Rogers • Mar 12, 2020
As Coronavirus Spreads, the Gulf’s Economic Prognosis Is Not Healthy
By Bill Law • Mar 11, 2020
Coronavirus Threatens China’s Global Trade and Investment Regime
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 09, 2020
Will a Struggling Global Economy Survive the Coronavirus?
By Atul Singh • Feb 25, 2020

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious The Democratic Party Goes to War With Its Voters
Next PostNext Can a Candidate Who Isn’t Delectable Be Electable?
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept