• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • US Election
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

The Challenges Facing the Eurozone

The coronavirus pandemic opens a window of opportunity to initiate structural changes in eurozone countries.
By Pawel Tokarski • Jun 01, 2020
Eurozone, eurozone news, euro currency, European Union, EU news, European news, Europe, euro area, European Central Bank, Pawel Tokarski

© Oleg Elkov

The current public health crisis has become a major challenge for European economies. It particularly affects countries in the southern part of the eurozone, as they are still suffering from the effects of the euro debt crisis of 2009-12. In the absence of a convincing fiscal policy response from the European Union or the eurozone, the European Central Bank (ECB) has once again stepped in to stabilize the common currency.


Europe’s Moment of Truth Is Obviously About Debt

READ MORE


An intervention by the ECB costs little politically. The bank does not require a decision by the heads of state and government, nor does it require the approval of parliaments of EU member states. Without the rapid intervention of the ECB in this very volatile crisis, the single currency would most likely already have been seriously threatened.

Even in the euro crisis, the ECB’s expansive monetary policy had supported the affected economies. In the face of low interest rates, governments saved hundreds of billions of euros for debt servicing at the time. However, the bank’s stabilization policy had various undesirable side effects. Low interest rates hurt savers and inflated the real estate bubble. The purchase of member states’ debt securities also led to the increased involvement of the ECB in their economic and fiscal policies.

Pressure from the central bank on the Irish government in 2010 to bail out distressed banks with taxpayers’ money is evidence of this. Another example is the secret letters sent by the central bank to the Italian and Spanish governments in August 2011, giving them an ultimatum to initiate reforms. The recent large-scale purchases of government bonds in response to the coronavirus pandemic could — if the ECB continues its policy in this way for a longer period of time — once again make the bank a hostage of the economic policies of the affected countries.

Legally Questionable Commitment of the ECB

It is also problematic that such a massive engagement by the ECB goes beyond its designed role and raises legal questions, as shown by the recent ruling of the German Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG). The central bank’s main weapon is its potential ability to intervene indefinitely in the financial markets, including the purchase of government bonds. However, the BVerfG has formulated conditions for the purchase of assets, including an upper limit per issuer and a time limit for these transactions. With these limitations, the Eurosystem’s ability to effectively stabilize public debt over the course of several years is brought into question.

Embed from Getty Images

The eurozone countries should use the time given to them through the ECB intervention to reduce their dependence on the bank’s monetary policy. First and foremost, they must address their structural problems.

However, the measures adopted so far to combat the consequences of the pandemic have primarily been limited to financial support. For example, the EU has approved various aid instruments for the countries affected by the pandemic totaling up to €540 billion ($600 billion), including the instrument for short-time working (SURE). The European Commission’s new draft for the EU’s multiannual financial framework will also take greater account of the costs of the health crisis, including a new huge €750 billion recovery instrument, higher than the one proposed jointly by France and Germany.

The financial solidarity expressed here is important, but money alone is not enough to alleviate the structural problems in southern European countries. Even before the euro crisis, the economic models of many of these countries were unsustainable in the long term due to insufficient competitiveness, excessive debt and unfavorable demographic changes. The current crisis provides an opportunity to reflect on how economic models can be reoriented, for example, toward digitalization, environmental sustainability, investment in human capital and a reduction in bureaucracy for businesses.

Stabilizing Italy

Although these issues affect, to varying degrees, each euro area member state, including France and Germany, the main challenge to eurozone stability is the development of the EU-19’s — the states that have adopted the euro currency — third-largest economy, Italy. The impact of the coronavirus pandemic has further worsened the economic situation of the country, and ambitious responses are now needed at the EU and eurozone levels.

In addition to the generous provision of concrete grants — not loans — it is a matter of skillfully engaging in dialogue on the necessary structural reforms and exerting political pressure from various sides: from the European Commission and the Eurogroup, but also from Berlin and Paris. A new EU strategy for Europe’s economic recovery and development until 2030, which could be adopted at the end of the German EU Council presidency, would make sense here. It would make it possible to move away from the short-term focus on the immediate consequences of a pandemic. The decisive factor for its success, however, would be the willingness of the political class in Rome to take responsibility for serious reforms.

The coronavirus pandemic could be a defining moment for the eurozone. If this economic crisis — the most severe in decades — can be used as an opportunity for structural change that will reduce the level of mistrust between northern and southern Europe, the next logical step is the permanent joint issuance of bonds to stabilize the enormous increase in debt after the crisis. If the eurozone fails on the reform path today, we will wake up tomorrow with more debt and face the same problems as before, but with less time and fewer instruments to deal with them.

*[This article was originally published by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), which advises the German government and Bundestag on all questions relating to foreign and security policy.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Coronavirus, Economics, Europe, Europe News, European politics news, Eurozone, Politics, Quick read, World News TagsEU news, euro area, euro currency, Europe, European Central Bank, European news, European Union, Eurozone, eurozone news, Pawel Tokarski
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

What Has COVID-19 Done to Small Businesses?
By Vinay Subramanian • Jul 27, 2020
How Will COVID-19 Impact Our Economy?
By Atul Singh • Jun 26, 2020
COVID-19 Puts the Brakes on the “World’s Fastest City”
By Bill Law • Jun 15, 2020
Is the COVID-19 Bailout Another Scam on American Taxpayers?
By Atul Singh & Ti Ngo • Jun 07, 2020
The New Normal Is Nothing New
By Jean AbiNader • Jun 05, 2020
Morocco Sets Out a Post-Coronavirus Recovery Strategy
By Jean AbiNader • May 28, 2020
Central Europe Tiptoes Into the New World After Coronavirus
By Sona Muzikarova • May 21, 2020
Saudi Geopolitics Amid COVID-19 and the Oil Crisis
By Theodore Karasik & Alexander Jalil • May 15, 2020
Should We Reopen the Economy?
By John Feffer • May 15, 2020
Indonesia-UAE Relations Strengthen Amid COVID-19
By Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat & Theodore Karasik • May 12, 2020
What Will Post-Pandemic Economics Look Like?
By John Feffer • May 01, 2020
Coronavirus Makes Indonesians Get Online
By Dikanaya Tarahita & Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat • Apr 29, 2020
Fintech: Embracing the Digital Age in the Time of Social Distancing
By Glenn Ojeda Vega & German Peinado Delgado • Apr 28, 2020
Will COVID-19 Change Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia?
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 and Low Oil Prices Threaten to Leave Saudi Arabia With Empty Hands
By Bill Law • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 Is a Wake-Up Call on the Shortcomings of Globalization
By Hans-Georg Betz • Apr 23, 2020
How the Middle East Reacts to the Coronavirus Pandemic
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 14, 2020
Will the EU Survive the Coronavirus?
By John Feffer • Apr 10, 2020
Looking for a New Chapter in Central Eastern Europe
By Sona Muzikarova • Apr 02, 2020
COVID-19 Makes Johnson and Trump Reject Thatcher and Reagan
By Atul Singh • Mar 31, 2020
The G20 Needs to Show Leadership to Fight COVID-19
By John Bruton • Mar 30, 2020
COVID-19: Will We Learn the Lessons?
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 27, 2020
How Coronavirus Is Impacting Small Businesses
By Beau Peters • Mar 25, 2020
The COVID-19 Crisis Will Change Policymaking and Business
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 23, 2020
COVID-19 Outbreak Takes the Recession Debate to Brand New Territory
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 19, 2020
Will Coronavirus Break the Financial Market's Hubris?
By Daniel Wagner & Jonathan Rogers • Mar 12, 2020
As Coronavirus Spreads, the Gulf’s Economic Prognosis Is Not Healthy
By Bill Law • Mar 11, 2020
Coronavirus Threatens China’s Global Trade and Investment Regime
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 09, 2020
Will a Struggling Global Economy Survive the Coronavirus?
By Atul Singh • Feb 25, 2020

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious The Democratic Party Goes to War With Its Voters
Next PostNext Can a Candidate Who Isn’t Delectable Be Electable?
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept