• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Joe Biden
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

Is the COVID-19 Bailout Another Scam on American Taxpayers?

Bankers who gobbled up bailout money in 2009 are now diverting loans meant for small businesses to big companies while ordinary Americans are hurting.
By Atul Singh & Ti Ngo • Jun 07, 2020
COVID-19 bailout, COVID-19 stimulus package, economic stimulus, COVID-19 US economy, US economic crash, economic crash, economic collapse, US economy news, Atul Singh, Ti Ngo

Somerville, MA, USA © Micha Weber

A young Karl Marx once famously wrote that history repeats itself “the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.” At the height of the 2008-09 economic recession, Barack Obama’s administration unveiled an $832-billion stimulus package aimed at stabilizing the fractured banking system. While the Obama stimulus helped stabilize the US economy, its provisions put the interests of big banks and investment firms over that of individuals and small businesses. Wall Street trumped Main Street and arguably paved Donald Trump’s path to the White House.


Europe’s Moment of Truth Is Obviously About Debt

READ MORE


Obama’s stimulus allowed and even encouraged corporations such as J.P. Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs to swallow up smaller competitors. The CEOs of firms responsible for the financial crisis were not only exempt from criminal prosecution but given bonuses from taxpayer money. These millionaires ended up ruining their companies and still walked away with state funds. This was capitalism on the upside and socialism on the downside. It led to outrage. Both Occupy Wall Street of the left and the Tea Party movement of the right were born as a result.

Under President Obama, banks that were “too big to fail” became even bigger to fail. They were given a license to speculate on American taxpayer money. Timothy Geithner, the secretary of the treasury, left his cushy government job for an even cushier private one. After bailing out Wall Street, he became the president of Warburg Pincus, a noted private equity firm. Needless to say, he was and continues to be paid handsomely.

Geithner represents a sinister trend in American economic policymaking. Wall Street has taken over the US Treasury. Two of Geithner’s predecessors, Robert Rubin and Hank Paulson, marched in to take command of the Treasury from Goldman Sachs. Steve Mnuchin, the current big boss of the Treasury, also worked at Goldman, as did his father. 

Embed from Getty Images

If this was Nigeria or India, The New York Times would have carried a full story on incorrigibly corrupt Third World elites. However, this sordid story of American bankers coming and going through a revolving door from Wall Street to the Treasury and vice versa does not quite count as corruption for most Americans media houses. The same incestuous Ivy League elite runs both American media and finance.

While most journalists might give these sleazy arrangements a pass, ordinary Americans have become increasingly unhappy with what they see as a corrupt political system and rigged economic arrangement. Even as inequality has increased, social mobility has decreased. That is why President Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again,” resonated with voters in 2016. Many did remember a time when they could hope to lead better lives than their parents. The same dissatisfaction fueled Senator Bernie Sanders, an avowed socialist, to national prominence in both 2016 and 2020. Unlike Trump, Sanders could not mount a successful coup in his party.

The Rich Gain and the Poor Suffer, Again

Eleven years after the Obama bailout, another crisis has hit America. Thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic and an inept Trump administration, the economy is experiencing its biggest crisis since the Wall Street crash of 1929. Democrats and Republicans cooperated for once to pass the largest stimulus bill in American history. Of the $2.3-trillion package, $660 billion is earmarked for government-backed loans to save small businesses. Named the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), this effort to save the little guys seems to be geared more toward the big boys. It smells almighty fishy, if not rotten.

It is important to examine what the PPP promises. Loans “will be fully forgiven if the funds are used for payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities.” At least 75% of the forgiven amount must go to payroll. Loan repayments will be “deferred for six months.” Loans will be issued without collateral or personal guarantees. Also, “neither the government nor lenders will charge small businesses any fees.”

If it sounds too good to be true, then it usually is. The PPP is no exception. There are many reasons why the PPP has failed already.

First, the Small Business Administration (SBA) is responsible for the PPP. This small government agency has been overwhelmed by millions of loan applications, as have the banks partnering with it. Second, implementation has been so haphazard that banks are confused as to who to give loans to. Third, the loans were distributed on a first-come, first-serve basis. The money ran out quickly and few small businesses could file their applications in time. Fourth, the deadline of using the money by June and the dictum that 75% of the loan had to go to payroll was idiotic. Many small businesses decided not to apply because they simply could not qualify. Finally, Wall Street prioritized Goliaths over Davids for fat fees. Banks raked in $10 billion in two weeks for just processing loans given out by SBA.

Shake Shack and Ruth’s Chris Steak House received PPP loans worth $10 million and $20 million, respectively, but returned them after public outcry. Denny’s announced that franchisees that own more than half of its stores have received PPP loans, with more Denny’s restaurants still waiting for funds. The One Group Hospitality, a publicly-traded company that runs steak-house chain STK, had received $18 million by early May. The Los Angeles Lakers, which has a net worth of $4.4 billion, won a $4.6-million loan. Large, troubled companies have taken the money supposed to go to small, struggling businesses. If this is not corrupt, then little else is. America is increasingly eerily similar to the banana republics its corporations used to run in Latin America.

Doing “God’s Work” Pays

To understand how all of this happened, we need to look no further than the banks. In 2009, Lloyd Blankfein created quite a stir. The preternaturally confident CEO of Goldman Sachs declared banks were doing “God’s work.” After all, they helped “companies to grow by helping them to raise capital.” These growing companies created wealth. This led to “jobs that create more growth and more wealth.” In his view, banks “have a social purpose.” Big profits and fat bonuses were a small price to pay for these dream builders of the global economy. How could anyone remotely sensible disagree?

It seems curmudgeonly small businesses might. Citi’s private bank filled in applications for its customers. The minimum account size at the bank is $25 million. Clearly, the definition of small is relative. Other banks were determined not to be left behind. Some banks provided highly-personalized, so-called concierge service to their clients. They did god’s work by cutting through the red tape for their rich clients. In contrast, small businesses could only fill out online forms and wait for banks to get back to them. All too often, the banks never did.

Embed from Getty Images

There is a bigger issue at stake. Even if small businesses could get PPP loans, many would be wary of taking them. There is far too much uncertainty. For small businesses, uncertainty is an even bigger risk to solvency than liquidity. For example, no one knows when restaurants could reopen following the coronavirus shutdown, what type of restrictions would be mandated and whether the public might recover its appetite to eat out. If social distancing rules kicked in and restaurants had to operate at, say, 50% capacity, few would be able to survive in an industry with already wafer-thin margins. Indeed, many historical restaurants have decided to throw in the towel altogether and have let their patrons know they will not be reopening. 

What was originally a three-week hiatus has become a three-month ordeal. From the beginning of March, authorities have issued  “shelter-in-place” orders with the assumption that these would be temporary measures. Workers are finding these measures as temporary as soldiers in World War I found going to the front. Interestingly, it turns out that Memorial Day (May 25), which is when the US remembers those who died serving in the military, has come and gone, but Americans have yet to get back to work. 

To add fuel to the fire, the brutal killing of yet another black man by a white policeman has ignited protests and riots across the country. Looters smashed store windows this past week, emulating large corporations who had looted a $660-billion loan forgiveness program meant for small businesses. Once, Mississippi burned. Today, a spark in Minnesota has set off a tinderbox in America.

In the meantime, over 42 million Americans have applied for unemployment and are going hungry even as small dairies in Wisconsin and Ohio have dumped thousands of gallons of fresh milk into lagoons and manure pits. In Idaho, farmers have buried millions of kilograms of onions. In South Florida, a fertile region supplying much of the East Coast, beans, cabbages and perfectly ripe vegetables are being thrown back into the soil. At the same time, millions of American families are lining up for hours at food banks and leaving with little or even nothing.

It is small businesses, farmers and ordinary Americans who need PPP loans, not corporations or their millionaire CEOs or their wealthy shareholders. In the Obama bailout, bankers laughed all the way to the bank. Today, they are doing god’s work again by selling indulgences à la the 16thCatholic Church to the likes of Denny’s. Banks pocket fees, Denny’s gets the money. The Trump bailout is leaving small businesses and farmers high and dry. As Hamlet remarked, “the time is out of joint” and as Yanis Varoufakis observes, “the weak suffer what they must.”

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, American News, Coronavirus, Economics, Health, Insight, North America, US news, World News TagsAtul Singh, COVID-19 bailout, covid-19 stimulus package, COVID-19 US economy, economic collapse, economic crash, economic stimulus, Ti Ngo, US economic crash, US economy news
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

What Has COVID-19 Done to Small Businesses?
By Vinay Subramanian • Jul 27, 2020
How Will COVID-19 Impact Our Economy?
By Atul Singh • Jun 26, 2020
COVID-19 Puts the Brakes on the “World’s Fastest City”
By Bill Law • Jun 15, 2020
The New Normal Is Nothing New
By Jean AbiNader • Jun 05, 2020
The Challenges Facing the Eurozone
By Pawel Tokarski • Jun 01, 2020
Morocco Sets Out a Post-Coronavirus Recovery Strategy
By Jean AbiNader • May 28, 2020
Central Europe Tiptoes Into the New World After Coronavirus
By Sona Muzikarova • May 21, 2020
Saudi Geopolitics Amid COVID-19 and the Oil Crisis
By Theodore Karasik & Alexander Jalil • May 15, 2020
Should We Reopen the Economy?
By John Feffer • May 15, 2020
Indonesia-UAE Relations Strengthen Amid COVID-19
By Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat & Theodore Karasik • May 12, 2020
What Will Post-Pandemic Economics Look Like?
By John Feffer • May 01, 2020
Coronavirus Makes Indonesians Get Online
By Dikanaya Tarahita & Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat • Apr 29, 2020
Fintech: Embracing the Digital Age in the Time of Social Distancing
By Glenn Ojeda Vega & German Peinado Delgado • Apr 28, 2020
Will COVID-19 Change Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia?
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 and Low Oil Prices Threaten to Leave Saudi Arabia With Empty Hands
By Bill Law • Apr 27, 2020
COVID-19 Is a Wake-Up Call on the Shortcomings of Globalization
By Hans-Georg Betz • Apr 23, 2020
How the Middle East Reacts to the Coronavirus Pandemic
By Jean AbiNader • Apr 14, 2020
Will the EU Survive the Coronavirus?
By John Feffer • Apr 10, 2020
Looking for a New Chapter in Central Eastern Europe
By Sona Muzikarova • Apr 02, 2020
COVID-19 Makes Johnson and Trump Reject Thatcher and Reagan
By Atul Singh • Mar 31, 2020
The G20 Needs to Show Leadership to Fight COVID-19
By John Bruton • Mar 30, 2020
COVID-19: Will We Learn the Lessons?
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 27, 2020
How Coronavirus Is Impacting Small Businesses
By Beau Peters • Mar 25, 2020
The COVID-19 Crisis Will Change Policymaking and Business
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 23, 2020
COVID-19 Outbreak Takes the Recession Debate to Brand New Territory
By Sona Muzikarova • Mar 19, 2020
Will Coronavirus Break the Financial Market's Hubris?
By Daniel Wagner & Jonathan Rogers • Mar 12, 2020
As Coronavirus Spreads, the Gulf’s Economic Prognosis Is Not Healthy
By Bill Law • Mar 11, 2020
Coronavirus Threatens China’s Global Trade and Investment Regime
By Daniel Wagner • Mar 09, 2020
Will a Struggling Global Economy Survive the Coronavirus?
By Atul Singh • Feb 25, 2020

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious The Democratic Party Goes to War With Its Voters
Next PostNext Can a Candidate Who Isn’t Delectable Be Electable?
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept