invasion of Ukraine has raised fears among many Bosnians that their vulnerable state could also become a target. Like and Georgia, both now having suffered military intervention, and too has NATO membership aspirations that infuriate Moscow. In , and ‘s Serb-dominated entity that, like the breakaway regions of Donbas, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is opposed to NATO, Vladimir Putin’s prospects are of the highest geopolitical value, namely securing a loyal proxy ready to do Moscow’s bidding.
25 Years On, The Dayton Peace Agreement Is a Ticking Time Bomb
The Russian president has already held numerous official consultations with Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik, the latest one taking place in December 2021. During his second consecutive meeting with Putin in the midst of the 2014 Ukraine crisis, Dodik shared his unequivocal affiliation with Moscow, saying: “Naturally, there is no question that we support . We may be a small and modest community, but our voice is loud.” As current military intervention progressed in , Dodik also spoke to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov about the “implementation of agreements” reached during the last meeting with Putin.
Putin’s Proxy in Bosnia
In the quarter of a century since the signing of the Dayton Accords, and has been the site of occasional political crises but has never come close to military conflict. In recent months, however, Dodik has doubled down on his efforts to tear apart the postwar constitutional order of the country’s two constitutive entities, the Federation of and and . Emboldened by the resurrection of power, he pressed ahead with his nationalist political agenda aimed at dismantling institutional arrangements that have gradually restored peace and security over the last 25 years. As a result, Dodik was blacklisted by the US government in January this year.
In December 2021, lawmakers loyal to Dodik advanced their secession bid and voted 49-3 in favor of starting a procedure for to withdraw from central government mechanisms such as common defense, judiciary and intelligence, to name a few. They have also decided that within six months, the government in Banja Luka must recreate its own legislation governing such institutions.
To show it means business, said he won’t be daunted by opposition from the Western centers of power, suggesting that Moscow and Beijing will help if the West imposes sanctions.paraded paramilitary forces on January 9 in a nationalist celebration declared illegal by the constitutional court of and ; among the participants were the Night Wolves, a black-uniformed group of nationalist pro-Kremlin bikers. On February 10, Republika Srpska’s national assembly adopted the draft version of a law to create a separate judicial system from the rest of the state. Regarding his future plans, Dodik
Notwithstandinglocal proxy, fanning existing flames in and could be a rational adventure from Putin’s viewpoint for additional reasons. First, Serbian and Turkish reactions could fit the wider agenda if this trajectory with opposing power dyads within the Bosnian state takes a turning point.
Second, Putin is aware of the EU’s record of conflict management in ex-Yugoslavia, and EUFOR peace mission in may be vetoed by at the UN Security Council in November.in particular, in the early 1990s. It failed miserably to secure the peace in the heart of Europe, when the EU was a rising star and was at its weakest point. Third, extending the current
It is worth remembering thatand doesn’t have NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense guarantee to fall back on, and that President Joe Biden’s promise to defend every inch of NATO is meaningless for Sarajevo. Washington’s official position on protecting the parameters of the Dayton Agreement is as vague as its strategic ambiguity toward Taiwan.
Serbia and Turkey in the Bosnian Theater
President Putin has many good reasons to count on Serbia to exploit strategy, officially promoted in late 2019, transcends national boundaries in its content, marking a shift from defensive sovereignty to a more offensive approach.and ‘s internal weakness. Belgrade largely relies on weaponry and strong nationalist sentiments with the secessionist movement in . Serbia’s national defense
Serbia’s home minister, Aleksandar Vulin, the former defense minister who officially promoted this strategy, often exudes self-congratulatory confidence that the Western Balkans region is there for Serbia’s taking. At the ruling Serbian Progressive Party congress in July last year that took place a few months before the joint Serbian-stated that “Creating the Serbian World, where the Serbs would live and be united, is the task of this generation of politicians.”“Slavic Shield” military exercise, Vulin forcefully
Serbia has also accelerated military spending at a faster rate for several years now for no rational reason except regional supremacy. According to Global Fire Power, its current defense budget is almost twice that of and , Albania, Northern Macedonia, Montenegro and Kosovo combined. Serbia’s reliance on and Chinese military support has also been reinforced. In 2019, it received donations of fighter jets, tanks and armored vehicles from . In 2020, it bought CH92-A drones and FK-3 surface-to-air missiles from China and then purchased, at Putin’s suggestion, the Pantsir S-1 air defense system.
It is critical to understand why Serbia is arming so fast: From a realist perspective, its behavior could only become assertive, and more so ifmilitary intervention in succeeds.
Turkey is probably the second regional contender to be caught in the Bosnian fire for both domestic and external factors. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Ankara has been projecting soft power throughout the Balkans, particularly inand , relying on historical, cultural and economic ties. Turkey has also actively participated in all three peacebuilding missions in and : IFOR (1995-97), SFOR (1997-2004) and is currently among EUFOR’s 20 contributing countries.
However, in case of conflict, Ankara represents an imraportant geopolitical substitute should EUFOR abandon its commitments or if vetoes its mandate at the Security Council. Western powers have for far too long watched from the sidelines and have practically allowed this trajectory with opposing power dyads within the Bosnian state to take root. Hence, Turkey won’t shy away from using its military clout in the region.
The conventional logic of Turkish enmity with Serbia sets Ankara and Moscow on a collision course because Vladimir Putin perceivesand Serbia as natural, historic and strategic allies. However, would not necessarily oppose a Turkish role in the Balkans as long as Ankara’s move triggers some cracks within the Euro-Atlantic alliance. It also seems plausible for Turkey and — historically perceived as brothers by the two confronting parties in the Bosnian theater — to test their mediating capacity modeled after the Astana format launched after the and Turkish interventions in Syria.
Given their animosity with assessed that the Western Balkans “is going through new tensions today. History is coming back. Sometimes tragedy is coming back.”or Turkey, some European powers would expectedly oppose their interference in and on geopolitical grounds, while the more liberal ones will raise ideological concerns. Speaking on the subject of the priorities of the French presidency of the EU that began on January 1, President Emmanuel Macron
Macron also insisted on the “very special responsibility” toward these countries in terms of fighting external interference. What Macron fears is that extra-regional actors like replace the existing US-led liberal, institutional and rules-based order with a more anarchic, illiberal and multipolar structure that fits image.or Turkey could fill the vacuum, in which case power relations would inevitably become subject to reconfiguration. This scenario is not unfeasible as does not project power in the Balkans for the sake of challenging Turkish interests in the first place. Its prime goal is to
A Slippery Slope for the EU and US
At first sight, a local collision inand would bear a striking resemblance to what transpired in in 2013-14. Without full integration into the EU or NATO, and is also a vulnerable target, just like has proven to be. and is also divided along similar geopolitical and domestic lines, between pro-NATO aspirations in Sarajevo and anti-NATO tendencies in Banja Luka.
However,and ’s instability is far more complex than the crisis in for one structural reason: It is not in near abroad but in the European underbelly, which presents both an opportunity and a threat for all opposing sides at the local, regional and international level.
The EU has for some time failed to find a unified response to the Bosnian crisis, let alone taking concrete measures, except increasing EUFOR mission by an additional 500 troops. While some founding member states, including Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium, urged sanctions against Milorad Dodik during a recent EU foreign ministers’ debate, newer members like Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia oppose them. In fact, some European populist leaders have been staunch supporters of theproxy in and .
Croatian President Zoran Milanovic stated recently that he was against the EU imposing sanctions against Dodik, saying that “If someone from Croatia votes for those sanctions, for me they will be a traitor.” Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban offered €100 million ($110 million) in financial aid to . Orban also opposed placing EU sanctions on Dodik, signaling an early warning that the EU, as a whole, may be unable to secure a peaceful Bosnia and , which again resonates with the EU’s poor historical record of conflict management in the region.
Hence, one should not exclude a possibility that EUFOR troops could be evacuated from Srebrenica genocide from taking place and making a mockery of UN resolutions on safe heavens. Should there be a prospect for this failure being repeated, the EU might decide to pass the buck on to Washington.and one day altogether, much in the same way the Dutch UNPROFOR battalion was pulled from Srebrenica in July 1995, failing to prevent the
In that case, small-nation turmoil and squabbles among Balkan nations could transform into a great-power rivalry. Will President Biden accept that call given his unreadiness for direct confrontation with Moscow? The US would face a choice between realist logic, which is to revert European security to Europeans, or a more liberal and interventionist approach, which is to preventunchecked incursion toward NATO’s eastern border.
There is still time for the US to deflate Republika Srpska’s rebellion and put it back in the political arena. Former Bosnian presidency member Haris Silajdzic recently suggested placing a small NATO brigade in Brcko, the site of fierce battles during the wars of the 1990s, and a few battalions on the and -Serbian border. If the US passes the buck back to the EU — which and Serbia will celebrate — the West needs to fasten its seatbelts and brace for impact. More so than the war in , a conflict in and has the capacity to trigger a regrettable European history.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.