The Taliban’s second takeover since 1996 is taking place in a regional context that poses challenges for the regime but also opens up new opportunities. Twenty-five years ago,took over a country largely destroyed by civil war; today, they find a reasonably functioning state.
At that time,regime was recognized internationally by only three states: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and . Iran, Russia and , on the other hand, supported the armed resistance by the .
Afghans Have Been Left at the Mercy of the Ruthless Taliban
Even after 2001, Afghanistan remained the scene of regional disputes. Whilebacked , became a strategic partner of the government. The common enmity against the US even made cooperation between Iran and possible, despite their ideological differences.
The stability of the new Taliban regime will depend on the extent to which it succeeds in avoiding renewed international isolation and proxy wars in Afghanistan. Central to this, both in relation to the Western states and to‘s neighbors, is the question of security guarantees from in return for political recognition and economic support.
Not only the US and other Western states but also‘s regional neighbors have called on to take action against terrorist groups that supported the Taliban’s conquest from their safe havens across the country in early summer. The Western community of states has its sights set on groups such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP).
Russia and the Central Asian republics fear a direct spillover of Islamist militancy onto their territory, whether by the ISKP or by extremist groups such as the Islamic Movement of or Jamaat Ansarullah, which recruits mainly from Tajiks or Chechen fighters.
China’s security interests in Afghanistan are also directed against the ISKP and against militant Uighur groups such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement., considered the Taliban’s closest ally, is demanding that the new leadership in Kabul take action against the Pakistani Taliban of the Tehrik-i-Taliban , which carries out attacks in from Afghanistan. For its part, Shia-majority Iran has turned its attention to groups like the Sunni ISKP-affiliated Jundullah, which operates out of Afghanistan.
In order to stabilize their rule,must thus find ways to credibly limit the radius of action of foreign militant groups in Afghanistan, to the extent that they take into account the security concerns of the respective neighboring states. This appears easiest with regard to the ISKP, considered a threat by the neighbors as well as the Western states. However, since and the ISKP are enemies, further fighting between the two groups is to be expected.
It could be even more difficult forto dissociate themselves from other militant groups such as the Haqqani Network, which is considered the military backbone of and has close ties to al-Qaeda. Other Islamist groups are linked by different loyalties to individual factions within the Taliban.
Consequently, the enforcement of security will probably not happen peacefully and is likely to become the starting point for renewed violence in Afghanistan. Nevertheless,could benefit in several ways if they do achieve it.
First, they will gain political recognition from neighboring states, which will increase their international legitimacy. Second, this may contribute to the country’s economic development. Afghanistan is central to a number of large-scale economic projects that would facilitate trade and transfer of energy between Central and South Asia and could also benefit Belt and Road Initiative.. is interested in implementing these projects, as are and China. Beijing could also increase economic cooperation with Afghanistan in the medium term as part of its
Third,would benefit militarily from such cooperation as it would minimize the risk that an armed opposition like the in the 1990s would again receive support from neighboring states.
At the same time, the different geopolitical environment and the Western states’ geostrategic rivalries with Russia and China now offermore options for cooperation. The US and Europe will make their future relations with the new regime conditional on concessions on security issues, human rights and the participation of women.
In contrast, neighbors such as China, Russia, the Central Asian states, Iran and, while also emphasizing their security interests vis-à-vis , will place less emphasis on human rights issues. This constellation is likely to significantly limit the West’s ability to influence ‘s future political and social development.
*[This article was originally published by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), which advises the German government and Bundestag on all questions related to foreign and security policy.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.