FO° Debate: Is the Focus on ESG a Good or Bad Thing?

Print

Talk of environmental, social and governance (ESG) is in the air. This is a term used by both companies and investors to signal that they are paying attention to sustainability, society and ethics.

The term itself is unclear. No one exactly knows what ESG means. Different people define it differently. Yet companies and investors use the term because it brings benefits.

Arguments for ESG

Companies can often sell more if they label themselves ESG. Customers these days want to make the world a better place and use their purchasing decision to do so. The argument for such use of ESG is simple: it benefits workers, society, the environment and companies themselves. 

For investors, the use of ESG helps them diversify their risk and invest in longer lasting stocks. This sort of investing could lead to a world without fossil fuels or plastics.

Arguments against ESG

Yet there are concerns about the use of the label ESG itself. It might not mean a lot. The term itself is inexact and companies self-report, leading to greenwashing. Companies often claim what they are not. The label itself is fake sometimes. This could lead to a culture of dishonesty and even fraud.

The use of the term ESG might actually make customers, companies or investors to believe that they are doing something significant whilst doing little or nothing at all. So, we could actually end up increasing the use of fossil fuels and plastic even as we spout pious ESG homilies.

What is the way forward?

Perhaps the ESG should not be such a catch-all phrase that includes women in leadership roles as well as saving polar bears. More precise goals and practices by companies might lead to much more progress than bandying the ESG term around.

There is also the possibility that ESG could be better defined over time. Standard metrics could evolve that actually give the term meaning and make it a useful term for customers, companies and investors.

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO° Talks: US Immigration Policy Has Now Reached a Complete Impasse

FO° Talks: Israel’s Invasion of Gaza Will Not Be Over Quickly

February 27, 2024

FO° Talks: Pakistan’s New Election Might Have Been Rigged

February 23, 2024

FO° Talks: Make Sense of the New Central Europe and the EU

February 20, 2024

FO° Talks: Making Sense of the World Through a Swiss Lens

January 19, 2024

FO° Talks: Make Sense of the Crazy Venezuelan Crisis

January 18, 2024

FO° Talks: Spain’s Sánchez Shows How to Make Victory Out of Defeat

January 06, 2024

FO° Talks: Daring Houthi Assaults in the Red Sea Threaten World Trade

January 04, 2024

FO° Exclusive: China’s Worsening Deflation Now Spells Big Trouble

January 03, 2024

FO° Exclusive: Houthis Cause Chaos in the Red Sea

December 29, 2023

FO° Talks: Peacemaker, Warmonger, Genius: The Titanic Legacy of Henry Kissinger

December 24, 2023

FO° Talks: How Milei’s Surprise Win Can Impact Argentina

December 19, 2023

FO° Exclusive: The Far Right Soars in the Netherlands and Argentina

December 10, 2023

FO° Exclusive: Israel-Hamas War Divides Societies in the West

December 08, 2023

FO° Exclusive: Emperor Xi Now Turns Lover Boy in San Francisco

December 05, 2023

FO° Talks: Make Sense Of Argentina’s Presidential Race

November 16, 2023

FO° Talks: Why New Israel-Hamas War Began and How Could it End

November 07, 2023

FO° Exclusive: Emperor Xi Jinping Now Gets Rid of Another Minister

November 06, 2023

FO° Exclusive: New Nonstop Drama in the US Congres

November 04, 2023

FO° Exclusive: Big Trouble in Israel and Gaza

November 02, 2023

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA