Arab News

Fake News Shines Spotlight on Psychological Warfare

Qatar news, Qatari news, fake news, Latest Qatar news, Qatar latest news, Doha news, UAE news, Latest UAE news, UAE latest news, United Arab Emirates news

Doha, Qatar © Paul Cowan

July 19, 2017 06:00 EDT

Aside from the fake news stories, the UAE and Qatar have been at it for a while.

Revelations about two incidents of Gulf-related fake news shine a spotlight on a long-standing psychological war between the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, as well as both states’ seemingly repeated and competing interventionist efforts to shape the Middle East and North Africa in their mold. In the latest incident, US intelligence officials asserted that the UAE had orchestrated the hacking in May of Qatari state news and social media sites in order to post incendiary false quotes that were attributed to Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani.

The UAE and Saudi Arabia declared their six-week-old diplomatic and economic boycott of Qatar on the basis of the hack, despite Qatari denials of the quotes and an investigation involving the Federal Bureau of Investigation. US intelligence reported that senior UAE officials had approved the hack on May 23, a day before it occurred. The UAE has denied the allegations.

The US claims came less than 24 hours after Reuters was forced to withdraw a report that six members of the Saudi-Emirati-led alliance had asked world soccer body FIFA to deprive Qatar of its 2022 World Cup hosting rights after it turned out to be fake. The story was widely carried by international media and news websites and constituted the basis of an analysis by this author. It was not immediately evident who was responsible for the false report.


The two incidents, nevertheless, highlight different strategies of the Gulf’s small states — buffeted by huge war chests garnered from energy exports — to project power and shape the world around them, including the current Gulf crisis. At the core of the differences lie diametrically opposed visions of the future of a region wracked by debilitating power struggles; a convoluted, bloody and painful quest for political change; and a determined and ruthless counterrevolutionary effort to salvage the fundaments of the status quo ante.

The UAE, together with Saudi Arabia, views autocracy as the key to regional security and the survival of its regimes, and it has systematically sought to roll back achievements of the 2011 popular Arab revolts that removed from power the leaders of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen who had been in office for decades. As a result, the UAE has allegedly backed regime change in a number of countries, including Egypt and reportedly Turkey; supported anti-Islamist, anti-government rebels in Libya; joined Saudi Arabia’s ill-fated military intervention in Yemen; and, in the latest episode of its campaign, driven imposition of the boycott of Qatar.

In contrast to the UAE, Qatar has sought to position itself as the regional go-to go-between and mediator by maintaining relations not only with states, but also a host of Islamist, militant and rebel groups across the Middle East and North Africa. Doha embraced the 2011 revolts and supported the Islamist forces — with the Muslim Brotherhood in the lead — that emerged as the most organized political force from the uprisings. Qatar’s support for the Brotherhood amounted to aligning itself with movements who were challenging autocratic Gulf regimes and forces that the UAE was seeking to suppress, prompting allegations that Qatar was supporting terrorism — defined as anything opposed to autocratic rule.

The hacking of the Qatari media websites in May and the fake soccer story were but the latest instalment in the psychological war between the two Gulf states. The UAE and Qatar had been waging a covert war in the media and through fake nongovernmental organizations (NGO), even before Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain first withdrew their ambassadors from Doha in 2014 in a failed bid to get Qatar to change its policies.

The UAE, the world’s biggest spender on lobbying in the United States in 2013, sought to plant anti-Qatar stories in American media.

To do so, it employed California-based Camstoll Group LLC, which was operated by former high-ranking US Treasury officials who had been responsible for relations with Gulf states and Israel as well as countering funding of terrorism. Under the contract, Camstoll would consult on “issues pertaining to illicit financial networks, and developing and implementing strategies to combat illicit financial activity.” In its registration as a foreign agent, Camstoll reported that it “has conducted outreach to think tanks, business interests, government officials, media, and other leaders in the United States regarding issues related to illicit financial activity.”

Camstoll’s “public disclosure forms showed a pattern of conversations with journalists who subsequently wrote articles critical of Qatar’s role in terrorist fund-raising,” The New York Times reported. Camstoll reported multiple conversations with reporters of The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Daily Beast, Dow Jones News Wires, Financial Times, Bloomberg News, CNN and the Washington Free Beacon.

In disclosing the UAE’s efforts to influence US media reporting on Qatar, Glenn Greenwald, a reporter for The Intercept, argued in 2014 that:

“The point here is not that Qatar is innocent of supporting extremists … The point is that this coordinated media attack on Qatar — using highly paid former U.S. officials and their media allies — is simply a weapon used by the Emirates, Israel, the Saudis and others to advance their agendas … What’s misleading isn’t the claim that Qatar funds extremists but that they do so more than other U.S. allies in the region (a narrative implanted at exactly the time Qatar has become a key target of Israel and the Emirates). Indeed, some of Qatar’s accusers here do the same to at least the same extent, and in the case of the Saudis, far more so.”

Qatar’s response to the media campaign against it was illustrative of its ineptitude prior to the current Gulf crisis in fighting its public relations and public diplomacy battles, clumsiness in developing communication strategies, meek denials of various accusations, and failure to convincingly defend its controversial policies. In a bid to counter its World Cup critics, Qatar contracted Portland Communications, which is founded by Tony Allen, a former adviser to Tony Blair when he was prime minister, according to Britain’s Channel 4 News.

The news show linked Portland to the creation by Alistair Campbell, Blair’s chief communications advisor at Downing Street and a former member of Portland’s strategic council, of a soccer blog that attacked Qatar’s detractors. Channel 4 News reported that the blog projected itself as “truly independent” and claimed to represent “a random bunch of football fans, determined to spark debate.” The broadcaster said the blog amounted to “astro-turfing,” the creation of fake sites that project themselves as grassroots but in effect are operated by corporate interests. The blog stopped publishing after the news report.


Qatar also thought to undermine UAE efforts to tarnish its image with the arrest in 2014 of two British human rights investigators of Nepalese origin who were looking into the conditions of migrant labor. The investigators worked for a Norway-based NGO, the Global Network for Rights and Development (GNRD), which was funded to the tune of €4.2 million ($4.8 million) a year by anonymous donors believed to be connected to the UAE.

Founded in 2008, GNRD was headed by Loai Mohammed Deeb, a Palestinian-born international lawyer who owned a UAE-based consultancy and reportedly operated a fake university in Scandinavia, according to veteran Middle East author and journalist Brian Whitaker who took a lead in investigating the group. GNRD said it aimed to “to enhance and support both human rights and development by adopting new strategies and policies for real change.”

In 2014, GNRD published a human rights index that ranked the UAE at number 14 in the world and Qatar at 97. Heavy criticism of the index persuaded the group to delete the index from its website. GNRD, moreover, consistently praised the UAE’s controversial human rights records with articles on its website on the role of women, the UAE’s “achievements in promoting and protecting the family, environmental efforts, care for the disabled and its protection of the rights of children.

GNRD was closed following police raids in 2015, the confiscation of $13 million in assets, and charges of money laundering that have yet to be heard in court. Norwegian investigators said UAE diplomats had fought hard to prevent the case going to court.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Paul Cowan /

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member