Brexit news

New Cracks in the Global Far Right?

It may be that, unlike what Europe saw in the 1930s, resistance to a long drift to the right is swelling.
By
Donald Trump news, Boris Johnson news, Benjamin Netanyahu news, Benny Ganz news, Israel election news, Trump impeachment news, UK election news, populism news, far-right news, right-wing extremism news

© Arthimedes / Shutterstock

October 31, 2019 09:14 EDT
Print

In a remarkable confluence of events, the right-wing national leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom and Israel find themselves, at least for a brief historical moment, besieged by criticism and stark political dangers. In the US, President Donald Trump is facing a more serious impeachment threat than ever before, slowly but steadily sinking in the polls and seeing even his notoriously hardheaded Republican support weaken.

In the UK, Prime Minister Boris Johnson is struggling to push his country out of Europe despite mounting opposition and parliamentary roadblocks. And in Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just failed to form a new government, giving his nemesis a chance of his own, even as the likelihood that he will face criminal charges grows.

These men, nationalist rebels against the postwar liberal democratic consensus, have become heroes for the far-right anti-globalist movement that has grown so dramatically in recent years. But now they are in trouble. Are we finally seeing real cracks in the global far right?

To be sure, the ethno-nationalist movement, or, if you prefer, the populist right-wing movement, hardly seems to have slowed. In countries like Hungary, Poland, Greece, Russia and any number of other places, authoritarian and illiberal regimes and leaders have been on the march for years now. Public opinion in many of these nations has swung increasingly against the postwar liberal consensus.

But it seems undeniable that some real pushback has materialized, especially in recent months. That may be a sign that civil society in these countries is more resilient than it has appeared in recent years — that the forces opposing right-wing nationalism are gaining, if not a lot, at least some new strength.

In the US, every day brings new revelations that seem to ensure that Trump will be impeached, even if the odds of him being convicted and removed from office still seem fairly low. In Great Britain, even though Johnson is still lionized by the pro-Brexit right, the prime minister still faces a steep uphill battle to getting a deal with the European Union that will satisfy his many critics — provided that his party wins the general election scheduled for December 12. In Israel, if Netanyhu’s political rival, Benny Gantz, has promised not to form a coalition with Likud if Netanyahu remains prime minister after being indicted. Prosecutors are moving toward indicting Netanyahu on corruption charges.

In none of these countries has the left shown itself to be stronger than the political right represented by their top leaders. But the three men are each facing potential career-ending catastrophes and a weakening of their political parties. At the same time, the radical right, which to a large extent supports these leaders in each of these countries, is facing new troubles.

In the US, particularly, there is a new awareness of white-supremacist violence, which law enforcement officials now agree is the principal terrorist threat. In all of them, online companies like Google are increasingly “de-platforming” radical-right groups — removing their content from the internet. And, as an anecdotal matter, resistance by civil society groups to the rise of the radical right seems to be on the upswing.

We are nowhere near a real tipping point that would signal a reversal of the rise of the extreme right in recent decades. The causes of the crisis — a rapidly changing world, financial inequities, racial conflicts and rising immigration, among others — have not lessened at all. But in the end it may be that, unlike what Europe saw in the 1930s, resistance to a long drift to the right is swelling. We can only hope that these signs are real.

*[The Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right is a partner institution of Fair Observer.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member