American News

What’s at Stake for Trump’s Investment in North Korea?

Kaesong Industrial Complex, Korea DMZ, unification of Korea, Trump Nobel Prize, Trump foreign policy, war in Syria, US South Korea military exercises, world news, Kim Trump Singapore, North Korea nuclear program

© Novikov Aleksey

July 05, 2018 10:36 EDT

The president may be a diplomatic wrecking ball, but he believes his investment in Korea is too big to fail. 

Donald Trump loves to tell the following story.

You go to a bank and borrow $3 million. If you can’t pay it back, you have a problem.

But say you go to a bank and borrow $300 million. Then, if you can’t pay it back, both you and the bank have a problem. In other words, the bank has made such a huge investment in you that it can’t let you fail. Your success becomes the bank’s success.

Donald Trump has made a similar investment into North Korea. That investment is not monetary. There is no Trump Tower (yet) in Pyongyang.

Rather, Trump has a major investment of political capital in North Korea. He has ignored the advice of the entire US foreign policy establishment by meeting with Kim Jong-un in Singapore. He is gambling that the North Korean leader is truly willing to embark on denuclearization. And now, because of this enormous investment, Trump doesn’t want his new initiative with North Korea to fail. Because if it does, it’s not just North Korea’s problem, it’s also Trump’s problem.

After all, Trump’s nascent détente with North Korea is his only foreign policy success to date. He’s made a mess of relations with Mexico and Canada. His imposition of tariffs has put the United States on a collision course with Europe and China. A Middle East peace plan is incredibly unlikely. The wars in Afghanistan and Syria continue. A war with Iran is in the offing. The only sign of hope is on the Korean peninsula. The summit with Kim Jong-un is the only proof that Trump is a good negotiator. The new relationship with North Korea is Trump’s only shot at a Nobel Prize.

Trump has already made several down payments on his investment. At the press conference after the Singapore summit, he went out of his way to declare Kim Jong-un “very talented” and “very smart” and a “very good negotiator.” That was an enormous propaganda gift to the North Korean leader.

Second, Trump unilaterally scrapped a major military exercise between the United States and South Korea‚ this summer’s Ulchi Freedom Guardian exercises. The US president made this decision apparently without consulting either his own military advisors or the South Korean government (though both have gone along with the decision).

Third, according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Trump administration is not insisting on a strict timeline for denuclearization.

The Democratic Party, the media and the foreign policy pundits all believe that Trump has made a bad investment. They have given Trump very poor marks for his performance in Singapore. They argue that North Korea outmaneuvered Trump and that the agreement signed at the summit is all show and no substance. There is tremendous skepticism that North Korea will take concrete steps toward denuclearization.

America’s foreign policy elite is wrong. Trump’s investment has already yielded important dividends. The two Koreas are discussing some very important steps to improve inter-Korean relations. They are thinking about moving the artillery pieces near the DMZ away from the border as a confidence-building mechanism. They are talking about re-opening the Kaesong Industrial Complex — the facility located just north of the DMZ that combined South Korean capital and North Korean labor — and have already done some work at the shuttered site to prepare to build a joint liaison office. Talks are underway to restart divided family reunions this summer.

Donald Trump himself is not responsible for any of this. In fact, he has probably ignored the briefings that explain these developments. But what’s critically important is that Trump is not impeding progress in inter-Korean reconciliation. Eager to demonstrate that his summit with Kim was a success, Trump has helped to create a more conducive environment for North and South to make concrete plans.

The major stumbling block of economic sanctions remains. Indeed, the Trump administration recently renewed US sanctions against North Korea for another year. The sanctions applied by the United Nations, meanwhile, will make it rather difficult for the two Koreas to push very far with economic cooperation. However, all sanctions regimes come with exceptions. As inter-Korean relations progress, the two sides should explore ways of including exceptions for joint enterprises like the Kaesong Industrial Complex in the international sanctions against North Korea.

But for all of this to happen, it’s necessary to maintain the useful fiction that the Singapore summit was a rousing success and that Donald Trump has made a contribution to peace in Northeast Asia. It doesn’t matter that the administration hasn’t established a timeline for denuclearization. It doesn’t matter that the administration hasn’t briefed Congress on the results of the summit. It doesn’t matter that Trump himself has moved on to other issues.

What’s important is that Trump is invested in the success of his venture. Because if it fails, he fails. And Donald Trump doesn’t like to fail.

Equally important, Kim Jong-un must understand that dealing with Trump is a lot easier than negotiating with whoever comes after Trump. If Kim wants to change US-North Korean relations, he has a two-year window of opportunity. Trump’s successor could reverse his policy as quickly as Trump unraveled Obama’s deals with Iran and Cuba.

Meanwhile, the two Koreas will have a chance to take concrete steps toward a complete, verifiable and irreversible peace. They will turn the Singapore summit into something real and substantive. In other words, they can create an inter-Korean enterprise that will be too big — and have the hopes and dreams of too many people invested in it — to fail.

*[This article was originally published by Hankyoreh and Foreign Policy in Focus.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Novikov Aleksey /

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member