Are Gentrification and Hate Speech Killing Germany’s Soul?

Germany is confronting two deep societal tensions: how to curb hate speech without compromising free expression, and how to address gentrification while preserving urban community life. From Berlin’s protests to Frankfurt’s experiments, these debates offer insights for us all.

Fair Observer

SUBSCRIBE / INVITE FRIENDS / BROWSER

JUNE 29, 2025

Roberta Campani

Communications and Outreach

Dear FO° Reader,

I live in Geneva, one of Switzerland’s great cities. Germany is a neighboring country, but I have only visited it briefly. Yet its vibrant culture and innovative spirit fascinate me. In the 18th and 19th centuries, German philosophers like Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche shaped the modern philosophy curriculum. In the 19th and 20th centuries, Germany pioneered not only all kinds of new technologies but also the modern welfare state. By the 21st century, Germany had become an economic and political powerhouse, and, despite its current economic woes, what happens in Berlin (and Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich) reverberates far beyond the federal republic’s borders.

Today, I have stories on two issues to share with you. I picked these topics because they challenge the foundations of modern society. Germans are confronting those challenges in revealing ways:

What is the balance between free speech and hate speech?
How do cities create equitable housing at a time of rapid change?

Free Speech vs. Hate Speech: A German Approach

Unlike countries with a more libertarian stance on speech, Germany has a broad consensus that certain speech must be restricted to protect democracy and human dignity. This philosophy underpins laws like the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), which mandates the swift removal of illegal hate speech.

Algorithm-Driven Extremism: A computational study analyzed 32 million posts from 6.8 million users across major social networks and found that “hatemongers” — highly connected, hateful users — dominate echo chambers, significantly amplifying hate speech. These users cluster tightly and initiate cascades that reach far deeper than isolated hateful comments. Crucially, algorithmic “popularity-based recommendations” often boost these cascades, unintentionally (?) promoting extremist content.
Arxiv: Hatemongers ride on echo chambers to escalate hate speech diffusion
Impact of NetzDG: A German-based econometric study measured Twitter’s response to the 2018 Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG). It found significant and sustained reductions in hate speech related to migration and religion in German tweets — without impacting tweets on other topics. While most user takedowns stemmed from borderline, non-illegal content, the law’s transparency requirements improved platforms’ content moderation practices.
ZEW Study: Combating Online Hate Speech
Elon Musk’s Backlash: Musk denounced Germany’s aggressive approach as “hard to even process” for Americans, asserting that the crackdown represents an assault on online freedom. German authorities, however, highlight a surge in hate-related offenses — some prosecuted through data obtained from X — calling it systemic non-compliance. The Federal Justice Office has initiated formal proceedings for a “systemic failure” under NetzDG, emphasizing that the Internet “is no lawless space.”
Welt: “Systemisches Versagen”
Ongoing Challenges: Despite legal frameworks like NetzDG, enforcement gaps remain. A Der Spiegel article argues that authorities have been slow to act, leaving victims of online hate feeling abandoned. Meanwhile, Bavaria and other states are pushing for tougher penalties, reflecting a nationwide effort to strengthen digital safeguards.
Der Spiegel: Hass im Internet: Noch immer fehlt der Wille

Additional Context

For Bavaria’s hate speech penalties, try searching the site: https://www.spiegel.de/ “Bayern” “Hate Speech” 2024
Example: Spiegel article on Bavaria’s stricter laws
Elon Musk’s tweet can be found via the website: twitter.com/elonmusk “Germany” “free speech” since January 1, 2023

Housing: Berlin’s Resistance and Frankfurt’s Experimentation

Germany’s housing crisis reflects a challenge to deeper societal values. Traditional community cohesion is increasingly challenged by market forces. Like many other countries, Germany is struggling to find the balance.

Berlin’s Gentrification Battles: A heated debate is unfolding in Berlin over the accelerating pace of gentrification. Police raids against housing projects in Kreuzberg have sparked protests, with residents warning: “Gentrification is killing the city’s soul.” Community groups demand stronger protections like “Milieuschutz” (social environment preservation laws) and advocate for the city to re-purchase formerly public housing to halt speculative development.
Tagesspiegel: Protest im Kiez
Frankfurt’s Communal Housing: In contrast, Frankfurt is experimenting with communal and intergenerational housing projects (“Gemeinschaftswohnprojekte”). Supported by public subsidies and civic groups, these initiatives offer lower living costs and stronger social bonds—though they require careful management of collective decision-making.
FR: Wege zum gemeinsamen Wohnen

Why German News Reveals

These stories reveal tensions that exist in all modern societies. We all need to think about two crucial questions Germany’s controversies raise. How do we balance freedom and safety in the digital age? Can cities grow without losing their soul? Different cultures will provide different approaches to these questions. There will be no universal answers, but comparing the practices of our nations and cultures will help each of them to find the appropriate balance.

We may not have answers to these questions yet but Germany offers some insights that might be useful for others in different parts of the world.

Wishing you a thoughtful week,

Roberta Campani

We are an independent nonprofit organization. We do not have a paywall or ads. We believe news must be free for everyone from Detroit to Dakar. Yet servers, images, newsletters, web developers and editors cost money.

So, please become a recurring donor to keep Fair Observer free, fair and independent.