• World
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Central & South Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
    • US Election
    • US politics
    • Donald Trump
    • Brexit
    • European Union
    • India
    • Arab world
  • Economics
    • Finance
    • Eurozone
    • International Trade
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Startups
    • Technology
  • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Film
    • Books
    • Travel
  • Environment
    • Climate change
    • Smart cities
    • Green Economy
  • Global Change
    • Education
    • Refugee Crisis
    • International Aid
    • Human Rights
  • International Security
    • ISIS
    • War on Terror
    • North Korea
    • Nuclear Weapons
  • Science
    • Health
  • 360 °
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice
  • About
  • FO Store
Sections
  • World
  • Coronavirus
  • US Election
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Publish

Make Sense of the world

Unique insight from 2,000+ contributors in 80+ Countries

Close

COVID-19 Will Have Long-Lasting Effects on Migration

The vicious cycle of suppression, spikes in migration, renewed hostilities and reintroduction of restrictive policies could continue for years after the pandemic.
By Michelle L. O'Brien & Maureen A. Eger • May 14, 2020
Michelle L. O’Brien, Maureen A. Eger, COVID-19 effects on migration, COVID-19 immigration, COVID-19 racism, COVID-19 Sinophobia, COVID-19 radical right mobilization, COVID-19 parallels to AIDS epidemic, COVID-19 racism against Asian Americans, COVID-19 racism Europe

Changi Airport, Singapore, 1/13/2017 © joyfull / Shutterstock

A dangerous cycle for immigrants has begun. On April 20, President Donald Trump announced that he would sign an executive order to temporarily halt immigration into the United States in order to curb the spread of COVID-19. As of April 1, 90% of the world’s population already resided in a country that implemented at least partial border closures. With the intention of stopping the spread of COVID-19, these border closures come at a moment when hostility toward immigrants and opposition to immigration is widespread. Not surprisingly, other political leaders have also used this crisis as an opportunity to halt asylum seeking and deport refugees, including in Canada and many European countries.

The pre-virus political climate was already characterized by skepticism of international migration, and to the extent that political leaders mobilize fears of immigrants, restrictive immigration policies could endure long after the pandemic. These fears will not make immigration less critical to national economies, however, and the tension between nativist fears and the demand for migration will remain. Thus, a more likely scenario is that most countries will lift restrictions on immigration in the coming months.

Opening Borders

When the borders open, there will be a spike in international migration. Increased border control generates a build-up of unmet demand for opportunities to migrate from sending countries, where remittances will decline and unemployment will increase. Demographic research suggests that when disasters and wars have restricted behaviors such as fertility, marriage and migration, these temporary suppressions have resulted in subsequent “spikes” of such behavior.

Based on recent migration trends, an estimated 7.5 million foreign nationals would have traveled to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and Russia for work or long-term stays in 2020. With a suppression for three to six months of an estimated 1.7 to 3.5 million migration trips, the subsequent spike in migration will not go unnoticed — especially not by radical-right parties poised to exploit COVID-19 to mobilize for more restrictive immigration policies.


Hate in the Time of Coronavirus

READ MORE


How is this mobilization facilitated? Sociological theories suggest that influxes in immigration can be associated with prejudice due to perceived threats, or, on the other hand, they may induce positive intergroup contact and ultimately reduce prejudice. While people may over time become familiar with high levels of diversity so that small increases in the relative share of an outgroup no longer intensifies prejudice — as has been the case with anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands — migration spikes have the potential to upend that trend.

For example, influxes of immigration have been tied to radical-right violence against and hostility toward migrants, asylum seekers and foreigners in Germany in the 1990s and in 2014-15, as well as in Norway, Russia, Britain and the United States at various points in time. As nativist fears of immigration increase, so too does the ability for the radical right to lobby for exclusionary policies consistent with their neo-nationalist ideology.

The vicious cycle of suppression, spikes in migration, renewed hostilities and reintroduction of restrictive policies could continue for years after the pandemic. This is particularly true in light of evidence that restrictive immigration policies almost never result in their intended goal of stopping migration. Paradoxically, such policies instead tend to change migration from legal and temporary to undocumented and long term.

Radical-Right Mobilization

There is another particularity of the COVID-19 restrictions that makes radical-right mobilization particularly likely. The fact that it was a pandemic that precipitated the border closures in most countries means that migrants have already been stigmatized as carriers of disease. Of course, the initial spread of COVID-19 was facilitated by movement, in the form of both tourism and migration, and, to be clear, border closures are helping curb the spread of the disease.

Nevertheless, political rhetoric on the dangers of tourism has not yet emerged, while violent scapegoating against people labeled as non-native has: against Asian Americans in the United States, against African migrants in parts of China, against those perceived to be of Chinese or Asian descent in Europe, and surely other cases that have yet to be reported. In most democracies, laws exist to protect migrants from discrimination or persecution, but enforcement of any such legislation is contingent on the will of political leaders to do so in the face of anti-immigrant prejudice, radical-right mobilization and increasing neo-nationalist claims.

Embed from Getty Images

The world is in dire need of responsible political leadership to navigate this crisis. This is not the first call for leadership in the wake of a viral epidemic. Through the 1980s and into the late 1990s, hostility toward and violence against people suspected of having HIV were widely reported in the United States. Gay men in particular were discriminated against in housing and labor markets, perpetuated in part by the failures of then-President Ronald Reagan’s early response to the growing public health crisis, which his administration treated as a joke.

The parallels with today’s political rhetoric on COVID-19 are not difficult to find. In the 1980s, in the context of homophobic attitudes and marginalization of gay men and women, Reagan insisted that AIDS was nothing more than a “gay plague.” Today, in the context of neo-nationalist sentiment and marginalization of immigrants, Trump insists on calling the novel coronavirus the “Wuhan virus,” to the point of alienating allies and disrupting G7 cooperation. Finding a parallel strategy to break the vicious cycle that now threatens immigrants is more difficult.

Gay rights organizations, initially formed during Stonewall, reorganized and mobilized around the HIV/AIDS crisis, and eventually federal funds were allocated to HIV prevention and research. Today, US-based immigration activist groups have demanded protections for immigrants in the coronavirus relief package, and migrant workers from Romania have begun to mobilize in Austria.

We have yet to see the ways governments will respond to the vicious cycle of suppression, spikes and stigmatization. We do not yet know the extent to which COVID-19 will have dangerous implications for immigrants and far-reaching consequences for the future of international migration. Yet a plethora of social science suggests that, without interventions, COVID-19 will dramatically impact immigrants and the migration systems on which the global economy and national labor markets rely.

*[The Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right is a partner institution of Fair Observer.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Share Story
Categories360° Analysis, Asia Pacific, China News, Coronavirus, Donald Trump News, Europe, Europe News, European politics news, Global inequality news, Health, Inequality news, Insight, North America, Politics, US news, US politics news, World Leaders News, World News TagsCOVID-19 border closures, COVID-19 consequences for migration, COVID-19 radical right, COVID-19 related discrimination, Donald Trump Wuhan virus, HIV/AIDS COVID-19 parallels, Maureen A. Eger, Michelle L. O’Brien, Ronald Reagan gap plague
Join our network of more than 2,000 contributors to publish your perspective, share your story and shape the global conversation. Become a Fair Observer and help us make sense of the world.

READ MORE IN THIS 360° SERIES

The Lockdown in India Reveals the Nation Has Lost Its Soul
By Avay Shukla • Jul 03, 2020
The Heroes and the Martyrs of New York’s Battle With COVID-19
By Luca Zanchi • Jun 27, 2020
How Will COVID-19 Shape Our Society?
By Atul Singh • Jun 26, 2020
COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Have Real-World Consequences
By Gary Buswell • Jun 18, 2020
Will COVID-19 Help Us End Food Waste?
By Emil Wasteson • Jun 17, 2020
COVID-19 Brings an Epidemic of “Othering”
By Hariz Fauzan Othman • Jun 11, 2020
The Deadly Disorder Behind COVID-19 and Police Violence
By Iziah Thompson • Jun 03, 2020
India Comes Together During Coronavirus Pandemic
By Anuraag Saxena • May 29, 2020
Keeping the Academic Community Connected During the Pandemic
By Alicja Rybkowska • May 28, 2020
Abuse in Lockdown: Gender Violence in the Philippines
By Christianne France Collantes • May 20, 2020
Indonesia’s Policy Over Travel Leads to Confusion for Eid
By Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat • May 20, 2020
The Colorful World of Coronavirus Conspiracies
By Hans-Georg Betz • May 13, 2020
A Better Way to Connect in Lockdown
By William Softky • May 11, 2020
No, 5G Didn't Cause the Coronavirus Pandemic
By Beau Peters • May 11, 2020
Hate in the Time of Coronavirus
By Kitty Shropshire • May 07, 2020
Bringing Stranded Workers in Indian Cities Back to Their Villages
By Chittaranjan Kaul • Apr 30, 2020
During the Coronavirus Pandemic, Migrant Workers Are Being Overlooked
By Brennan Kau • Apr 30, 2020
Finding Work in the Middle of a Pandemic
By Beau Peters • Apr 28, 2020
The Indian Government Is Failing Its People
By Sandeep Pandey • Apr 24, 2020
There Is No Escaping Coronavirus Advice from Celebs
By Ellis Cashmore • Apr 11, 2020
Going Vegan in the Time of Corona
By Alicja Rybkowska • Apr 10, 2020
Anne Frank’s Amsterdam: Remembering Our Privilege in Times of Pandemic
By Colleen Boland • Apr 03, 2020
Making the Best of Social Distancing
By William Softky • Mar 27, 2020
The Art of Social Distancing According to Hannah Arendt
By Kate Bracht • Mar 23, 2020
The News Media and Public Health Crises
By Virgil Hawkins • Mar 19, 2020
Faced With the Coronavirus Challenge to Our Humanity, We Have Been Found Wanting
By Hans-Georg Betz • Mar 18, 2020
Xenophobia and Denial: Coronavirus Outbreak in Historical Context
By Hans-Georg Betz • Feb 28, 2020

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Wells Fargo’s Crimes Will Be Forgiven
Next PostNext The Gray Lady and Withdrawing US Troops From Afghanistan
Subscribe
Register for $9.99 per month and become a member today.
Publish
Join our community of more than 2,500 contributors to publish your perspective, share your narrative and shape the global discourse.
Donate
We bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible.

Explore

  • About
  • Authors
  • FO Store
  • FAQs
  • Republish
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact

Regions

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Central & South Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • North America

Topics

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Environment
  • Global Change
  • International Security
  • Science

Sections

  • 360°
  • The Interview
  • In-Depth
  • Insight
  • Quick Read
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Interactive
  • My Voice

Daily Dispatch


© Fair Observer All rights reserved
We Need Your Consent
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. Learn more about how we use cookies or edit your cookie preferences. Privacy Policy. My Options I Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Edit Cookie Preferences

The Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.

As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.

 
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies essential for the website to function.

Analytics

These cookies track our website’s performance and also help us to continuously improve the experience we provide to you.

Performance
Uncategorized

This cookie consists of the word “yes” to enable us to remember your acceptance of the site cookie notification, and prevents it from displaying to you in future.

Preferences
Save & Accept