Tesla’s impressive bookings for its next electric car suggest that it may be close to tapping the mainstream market.
“The Week that Electric Vehicles Went Mainstream,” is how Tesla Motors headlined its blog post in early April, citing more than 325,000 pre-bookings for the Model 3 electric car it launched on March 31. “[That] corresponds to about $14 billion in implied future sales, making this the single biggest one-week launch of any product ever,” the company boasted. Deliveries are set to begin in 2017.
Tesla may well be on the way to mainstreaming the electric vehicle market for itself and its competitors. In addition to the wide appeal the Model 3 seems to command, several other aspects point to a potential journey away from a niche market for Tesla. The car’s $35,000 price tag is half the price of the Model S ($75,000) and the Model X ($80,000). Bookings for the Model 3 have surprised even Tesla’s founder and CEO Elon Musk, coming at a time when gasoline prices are low.
“Electric vehicles increasingly are being seen not necessarily as green or as a way to save on fuel costs, but as incredibly powerful, with amazing acceleration, and fun to drive,” said Wharton Management Professor John Paul MacDuffie, an automobile industry expert. In fact, he noted that the organizers of the Formula One auto races (Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile, or FIA) have launched a separate series for electric vehicles called the Formula E. Even the Formula One cars are all hybrids, combining the high acceleration of electric vehicles with traditional engines, he noted.
Wesley R. Hartmann, marketing professor of management at Stanford University, said the Model 3 “is the make or break for whether the electric vehicle market will take off and whether Tesla will be a critical part of it, as opposed to being a niche player.”
MacDuffie and Hartmann discussed Tesla’s Model 3 and the challenges the firm faces in tapping the mainstream market on the Knowledge@Wharton show on Wharton Business Radio on SiriusXM channel 111. (Listen to the podcast at the top of this page.)
Kudos Flow In
MacDuffie said it was “telling” that Carlos Ghosn, chairman and CEO of Nissan of Japan and Renault of France, has welcomed the Model 3 bookings, “because it suggests a growing and enthusiastic market for these vehicles.”
MacDuffie also noted that bookings have been strong despite low gas prices, indicating that gas prices are not the primary driver of demand for electric vehicles. “People buying a $70,000 to $110,000 car aren’t worried about what they pay out at the gas pump,” he said. “If the demand exists even with gas prices being low, it is [because] of that repositioning away from just an environmental pitch.”
Hartmann said the enthusiasm for the Model 3 “speaks to what Tesla has been able to communicate to the market in terms of the products they can develop and how much people would want those.” He likened it to “people lining up to get” the latest Apple iPhones.
MacDuffie put the pre-bookings for the Model 3 in perspective. The $1,000 down payment that Tesla requires is not an order commitment and is a refundable deposit, he noted. “But it is an extraordinary interest-free loan to Tesla to get in the queue and to have the bragging rights of being early to get a hot product,” he said.
Indeed, the excitement over the pre-bookings for the Model 3 were tempered this week, when Tesla announced a recall of 2,700 Model X SUVs after it found that the third-row seat backs could collapse forward in some accidents.
Braving New Competition
If other automakers are keenly watching the progress of the Model 3, they would want to jump in, too. “What if competitor products are available earlier and they are good [and] well-priced?” asked MacDuffie. That could affect Tesla’s bottom line, he noted, but “if it’s a growing market, there should be room for everybody.”
Wharton Marketing Professor Americus Reed is optimistic for Tesla. “Tesla will be fine because it is a strong brand that is positioned as and is seen as very different from the other car manufacturers’ attempts at creating an electric car,” he said.
Reed added that Musk’s own brand image has also helped build a moat around Tesla. “Part of [Tesla’s] brand is a clear futurist visionary who himself is changing the world,” Reed noted, referring to Musk’s other roles as the founder of space transportation company SpaceX and co-founder of solar power company SolarCity.
“[Musk] is this larger-than-life character who makes you think of—in the computer industry—Steve Jobs, but [also] in the early auto industry history someone like Henry Ford,” said MacDuffie. “[Their] charisma and the boldness of their vision had an influence on people.”
Even so, questions persist about whether Tesla can pull it off, MacDuffie added. “The big question is: Can they really scale it up? What will the model look like when [the Model 3] hits the market at that price point? Will the price stay put or edge up?”
MacDuffie noted that Tesla has been a niche, low-volume producer, and the Model 3 would put it much more into the mass-market, mass-production range. “They haven’t done that before,” he said. “But they have learned to do other stuff that they didn’t know how to do, and so it would be risky to bet against them.”
The Model 3 would also benefit from the luxury brand image of Tesla’s earlier models. MacDuffie noted that most automakers have historically started with inexpensive vehicles as they established their reputations, manufacturing capabilities, supply chains and dealer networks. They moved up-market at a later stage, sometimes by introducing new brands—as with the Lexus from Toyota, he explained. “Tesla did it exactly the opposite way; it established itself at the luxury end,” he said. “Obviously, it will benefit from the way in which that luxury brand cachet will rub off on the Model 3.”
MacDuffie noted that Musk has attributed to “hubris” his decision to move from the original Model S to a more expensive car with the Model X ($80,000 and upwards). “That suggests a willingness to learn from a mistake,” he said. “In a way, designing a lower cost car is a big design and engineering challenge.”
Rather than Tesla’s luxury brand cachet rubbing off on the Model 3, “the more interesting question is the reverse,” said Reed. “What will happen to the brand as a unique luxury high end vehicle if suddenly it is ubiquitous in the mass market? What will a high-wealth individual who paid $70,000 or more think when he sees these $35,000 versions?”
Hartmann said that with the Model 3, Tesla may have hit upon a winning idea. It would have an electric vehicle for customers who cannot afford $70,000 but also don’t want to buy some other low-end vehicles in the market. “Most people expect that they’re probably not going to get half the car [with the cheaper model, but] a lot more than that—something somewhere in between,” he said. “That seems to offer an awful lot of value.”
The value proposition could get better for customers with the federal tax credit of $7,500 on each vehicle, but that has its limits. The tax credit scales back once a company has sold 200,000 electrical vehicles, said MacDuffie. Tesla has thus far sold 110,000 vehicles, which means the next 90,000 tesla buyers would get the full tax credit, he explained. The tax credit is subsequently scaled back, and it will disappear at some point, he added. “It is meant to prevent the big companies that have introduced electric vehicles from scooping up all the rebate monies; it is [meant to] encourage startups like Tesla.”
Hartmann expected Tesla to live up to the expectations built around the Model 3. He said customers of Tesla’s Model S “are incredibly happy with them.” Tesla had admitted that it had overreached in designing the Model X, and has tried to build a simpler vehicle with the Model 3, said Hartmann.
Challenges of Scale
As Tesla ramps up deliveries of the Model 3, it could find its current distribution model inadequate, MacDuffie suggested. “Tesla has tried to avoid setting up traditional dealer franchises,” he said. “Nobody likes buying cars from a dealer, but dealers also traditionally sell used cars, do servicing [and] provide parts and financing.” Dealers also invest in the inventory of vehicles and thereby absorb some of the risk if sales fall short of expectations, he noted.
Tesla so far has outsourced repairs and maintenance, and sales of used cars, but that model may work for a startup and not a company that grows bigger, said MacDuffie. “One speculation is Tesla is fighting hard against the franchise dealer model now, but once—and if—it grows big, it may find [itself] yearning for some of the [benefits] that the franchise dealer model provides,” he added. Hartmann agreed, and said that at some point Tesla may decide to go down that route.
Musk explained Tesla’s model of company-owned stores and service centers in a blog post in 2012 that may hold true even today. “In many respects, it would be easier to pursue the traditional franchise dealership model, as we could save a lot of money on construction and gain widespread distribution overnight,” he wrote. “[However], existing franchise dealers have a fundamental conflict of interest between selling gasoline cars, which constitute the vast majority of their business, and selling the new technology of electric cars. It is impossible for them to explain the advantages of going electric without simultaneously undermining their traditional business. This would leave the electric car without a fair opportunity to make its case to an unfamiliar public.”
Reed did not expect Tesla to be forced to change its strategies and embrace the dealer model as it scales up. “These customers will acquiesce to whatever Tesla wants them to do,” he said, betting on the company’s customer loyalties.
Changing Old Ways
According to MacDuffie, another hurdle for Tesla as it scales up is that it is vertically integrated and prefers to make most of its parts instead of outsourcing them. Making parts in-house would be harder to do at scale, although its vehicle batteries will be produced at its Gigafactory in Sparks, Nevada, that is expected to begin production in 2017. “Managing an outsourced supply chain, while very common in the auto industry, would be new for Tesla and bring coordination complexities.”
The limitations of the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles could prove to be another hurdle, said MacDuffie. He noted that Ghosn had identified the inadequacies of the charging infrastructure acting as a ceiling on the sales of electric vehicles. However, if the market grows to an attractive size, he expected public-private investments in setting up charging stations.
Tesla’s record of delaying deliveries beyond the promised dates could be another small worry if that persists. Hartmann noted that Musk has hinted at sticking to targets with the Model 3, but still “there is probably some uncertainty around the delivery date.” For example, Tesla began bookings for the Model X in February 2012, but postponed deliveries first from early 2014 to late 2014, and then to mid-2015 before deliveries began in the third quarter of 2015.
MacDuffie, too, said he expected delays in deliveries of the Model 3. However, he expected those missed deadlines to cause no more than a shuffling of customers between the Model 3 and other Tesla models. Would it hurt Tesla’s reputation at some stage? “At some point it would, but it would have to be a disastrous failure as opposed to just a slow rollout,” he said.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.