Through its military aid, the US is enabling the continuation of human rights violations in Mexico.
An international jury of independent human rights experts and advocates has found Mexico, the United States and key countries of origin of migrants in transit jointly responsible for widespread human rights violations in Mexico, based on hearings held at New York University in September 2015. The jury has called for the suspension of US military and police aid to Mexico.
The verdict of the International Tribunal of Conscience is based on testimony and documentation regarding the cases of 43 disappeared students from Ayotzinapa, the San Fernando massacre and mass graves of August 2010 and April 2011; the Acteal massacre of December 1997; and the systematic violation of migrants’ rights in detention centers and along the migratory route.
The tribunal’s verdict also draws attention to attacks on journalists and freedom of expression, such as those faced by Anabel Hernández, who was a key expert witness for the tribunal regarding her investigation of the Ayotzinapa case.
The verdict also highlights the relationship between human rights violations in Mexico and those in the US in the context of racism, femicide and gender violence; the criminalization of youth; mass incarceration; detentions; deportations; and the abuse of force by police and military authorities on both sides of the border. All of this has been reinforced recently by the scapegoating of migrants and refugees in Europe and the US—and of Muslims and Arabs in particular—as inherent dangers to national security.
The hearings in September coincided with the first anniversary of the Ayotzinapa case, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto’s visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly, and Pope Francis’ trip to the US. Witnesses included spokespersons for immigrants’ rights organizations, such as the Movement for Justice in El Barrio, the Popular Assembly of Migrant Families or APOFAM, and the Northern Alliance of Ex Braceros. Father Alejandro Solalinde, founding director of Hermanos en el Camino, a migrant shelter, testified on corruption and abuses by Mexican authorities.
Witnesses also included representatives of human rights groups based in Chiapas and Oaxaca, and human rights defenders in the US-Mexico border region of Las Cruces, El Paso and Ciudad Júarez.
Scale of Violence
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Raad al-Hussein has recently highlighted the “staggering” numbers of victims in Mexico (more than 150,000 dead and 26,000 disappeared since 2007), following an official visit there. Hussein underlined that, “While some of the violence can be laid at the door of the country’s powerful and ruthless organized crime groups, many enforced disappearances, acts of torture and extrajudicial killings are alleged to have been carried out by federal, state and municipal authorities, including the police and some segments of the army, either acting in their own interests or in collusion with organized criminal groups.”
The United Nations (UN) official emphasized that the scale of Mexico’s violence was especially notable, given that it is not a country normally classified with those characterized by armed conflicts such as Colombia or Syria.
The US has recently announced the suspension of $5 million in aid to Mexico through the Mérida Initiative, which includes $195 million currently appropriated, as part of over $2.5 billion in aid related to the drug war that has flowed since 2008.
The Leahy Law restricts US aid to regimes and military units deemed responsible for generalized violations of internationally recognized human rights standards. UN monitoring bodies such as the Committee Against Torture and on Enforced Disappearances, and international human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have expressed similar concerns.
The tribunal noted a large gap between Mexico’s proactive stance at the UN as a supposed champion of the rights of migrants and Indigenous peoples—two of the sectors most gravely affected by the violations documented in the sources cited above—and the reality as presented in testimony to the jury.
An increasing cascade of mass human rights crimes in Mexico has intensified concerns within the country and beyond. This includes the Aguas Blancas, Acteal and El Charco massacres in 1995, 1997 and 1998; the San Fernando massacre in 2010; and mass graves in 2011. It also includes several incidents since the Tlatlaya Massacre in June 2014; followed by the disappearance of 43 students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers’ College (Guerrero) in September 2014; and in the first half of 2015, several atrocities between January and May with a total of over 100 victims in Apatzingán, Villa Purificación and Tanhuato.
Two additional incidents along similar lines took place in July in Calera, Zacatecas—seven farmworkers forcibly disappeared by military personnel and found dead several days later in a mass grave—and in the town of San Miguel Ostula in the municipality of Aquila in Michoacán, where a 12-year-old child was killed and several others injured, when military personnel opened fire on community residents who had blocked local roads in protest of the arrest the day before of a leader of their Indigenous community police force.
The Drug War
All of these involve significant numbers of civilian victims and varying degrees of direct or indirect participation by federal, state and local police, together with the military as key actors, in contexts related to the country’s “drug war.” Several of these cases were presented before the tribunal.
There is a widespread tendency to describe Mexico’s “drug war” as a process of “Colombianization.” Today, Mexico’s battle against drugs is, in effect, a strategic, territorial and conceptual extension of Colombia’s in the 1980s and 1990s, through the Mérida Initiative. This arose within the framework of the national security component of NAFTA known as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. The initiative was originally referred to in US government circles as Plan Mexico, emphasizing its origins as the Mexican version of Plan Colombia
These trends provide a road map leading from the 1997 Acteal massacre in Chiapas, to the San Fernando massacre of migrants in transit in August 2010 and mass graves of April 2011, and most recently to the September 2014 case of the 43 disappeared students of Ayotzinapa. In each of these cases, the direct responsibility of paramilitary and narco-paramilitary forces for such crimes has been combined with decisive dimensions of state complicity.
The sheer number and seriousness of the human rights violations against migrants and other vulnerable sectors, such as the ones above, led the jury to find an overall pattern of state terror and state criminality.
The US, through its massive military and diplomatic aid for the government of Mexico, is enabling the continuation of egregious and systematic human rights violations.
*[A version of this article article first appeared in Truthout.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.