Judging wine is pretty much completely random.
Have you ever felt overwhelmed in front of a wall of wine at the store? Did you reach for the cheapest one, or the second cheapest, just in case? Or did you pick the most expensive one from the menu to impress your date? Did you notice a difference?
A study of 6,000 blind tastings in the US found that people—unless they have gone through wine training—actually enjoy expensive wines less, but will prefer it if they know its high price, according to another study.
Certified professionals are none the better at judging Gods’ nectar: When surreptitiously given three wines, only one in 10 judges at a California fair awarded it the same medal.
So, what are you drinking tonight?
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: Poplasen
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.