Trump’s policies against immigrants are an intensification of the Obama administration’s targeting of Central American refugees through raids.
As the Trump administration continues to criminalize immigrants and refugees, using executive orders to ramp up deportations, conducting large-scale raids that terrorize immigrant communities, and ordering the completion of the wall on the US-Mexico border, it simultaneously builds on the repressive US foreign policy that creates immigrants and refugees in the first place.
Donald Trump’s policies against immigrants are an intensification of the Obama administration’s targeting of Central American refugees through raids going after women and children in January 2016, as well as using large-scale family detention as a deterrence mechanism aimed at stopping others fearing for their lives from fleeing to the United States. The Trump administration is flagrantly exacerbating harmful US immigration and foreign policies that have been implemented for over a century.
ALLIANCE FOR PROSPERITY
On February 1, 2017, the US and Honduras signed an agreement for the disbursement of the first $125 million dollars of the “Alliance for Prosperity,” a massive funding package originally touted as a “Plan Colombia” for Central America. The president of Honduras, who is running for re-election after the disabling of the articles in the Honduran constitution that prohibit re-election, remarked that he was surprised just how quickly the Trump administration disbursed the funds.
The announcement of the $125 million distribution was a huge vote of confidence from the US, coming literally one day after Global Witness released a report entitled, “Honduras: The Deadliest Place to Defend the Planet.” The report details how “Honduras’ political and business elites are using corrupt and criminal means to cash in on the country’s natural wealth, and are enlisting the support of state forces to murder and terrorise the communities who dare to stand in their way.” Rather than condemn the role of state security forces in murders and repression of those defending their land and environment from so-called “development” projects, the US chooses to fund those same forces and promote more “development.”
The Obama administration claimed the Alliance for Prosperity would address the plight of the large numbers of Central American children and families fleeing to the US, but the package appears to combine neoliberal economic policies and “security” assistance, which will only further fuel migration, especially in Honduras where the police and military are frequently implicated in human rights abuses.
There is little transparency as to what exactly will be done with the money, but the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) appears to be playing a key role, with USAID signing the agreement with the Honduran government. USAID’s prior work in Honduras includes a project in partnership with the hydroelectric dam company DESA, with the agreement signed by the very same executive now charged with the murder of Berta Cáceres. This project is seen locally as a way of rewarding people who would accept the dam instead of protest violations of indigenous rights. After Cáceres’ assassination, USAID canceled the project.
The Salvadoran press reported that USAID will channel the first $97.9 million received by El Salvador for the Alliance for Prosperity, and that the money will be used for projects such as those prioritized in FOMILENIO II. FOMILENIO is the Millennium Challenge Fund, and CISPES has exposed how the US had originally made FOMILENIO II money for El Salvador dependent on privatization through a Public-Private Partnership Law, which “creates a mechanism to auction off public services and infrastructure to private corporations for management and partial ownership, from airports and highways to universities and municipal services.”
Dawn Paley writes in The Nation: “[T]he centerpiece of the Alliance for Prosperity involves tax breaks for corporate investors and new pipelines, highways, and power lines to speed resource extraction and streamline the process of import, assembly, and export at low-wage maquilas. These are the very things that community leaders in Central America are risking their lives to prevent.”
State security forces in Honduras are involved in the threats, attacks and murders of the activists protesting these neoliberal plans. In this way, privatization and neoliberal economic plans go hand and hand with “security” funding of repressive state forces. The Honduran president indicated the first disbursement of the money would also be used for security, “principally in the most difficult zones.” The Council on Hemispheric Affairs reported that “it is estimated that more than 60 percent of the entire budget for the APP [Alliance for Prosperity] is going towards ‘security measures.’”
State security forces are all too often used to repress those who stand up against the turning over of their land and resources to corporations or elite businessmen. In January, Honduran leader Miriam Miranda, coordinator of the Fraternal Black Organization of Honduras (OFRANEH), which has been defending ancestral Garifuna lands from tourism projects to benefit the elite, was stopped and threatened with jail by the Honduran police, despite the fact that the Inter-American Human Rights Commission has ordered the Honduran government to protect Miranda, not persecute her.
Just days later, police violently evicted a campesino community, shooting live bullets. Victor Vasquez, a leader of the Indigenous Lenca Movement of La PAZ (MILPAH), was shot and injured by state forces while filming the eviction.
March 2 marked one year since the assassination of internationally recognized indigenous activist Berta Cáceres in Honduras. Cáceres was one of those who sounded the alarm against the Alliance for Prosperity, calling it the “new big package of privatizations by the Honduran and US governments against the Honduran people.” When Central American government leaders gathered with the US at the Indura Beach Resort—which is built on ancestral Garifuna land and exemplifies how communities can be evicted and criminalized to benefit “development” projects and elite and corporate interests—to plan the Alliance for Prosperity in 2015, Cáceres alerted the Honduran social movements to organize to oppose it.
Today, as $125 million is being disbursed, Cáceres has conveniently been silenced. Those who ordered Cáceres’ murder are still free, though the Honduran government has charged an army major and others with links to the military and US-trained forces as well as the hydroelectric dam company DESA with her murder, indicating precisely the problem with sending even more finances to the Honduran security forces and promoting economic “development” such as the dam Cáceres opposed.
It is precisely the neoliberal economic policies promoted by the US and the financing of a repressive regime which serves US interests in Honduras that is fueling migration and creating refugees who flee to the US. The Alliance for Prosperity will only exacerbate the problem.
The US should immediately cease financing and supporting repression in Honduras. The Berta Caceres Human Rights in Honduras Act, HR 1299, introduced in the House on March 2 by Representative Hank Johnson, would suspend US military/security assistance to Honduras until human rights violations by the Honduran security forces cease and those responsible are brought to justice. Already 41 representatives have cosponsored the bill, and it is supported by a broad range of organizations.
Furthermore, instead of re-traumatizing families who have often borne the brunt of the broken immigration and foreign policy system, the US government should respect and fulfill its international obligations and provide those who fear torture or have a well-founded fear of persecution a safe haven. The federal government needs to immediately reverse the recently issued executive orders aimed at criminalizing and deporting refugees and immigrants, put a stop to raids, and ensure that migrants seeking a safe haven in this country are afforded a fair process to put forward their legal claims.
*[This article was originally published by Alternet.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.