The Qatar crisis, even without Turkey joining the fray, was putting fragile peace arrangements in the Horn of Africa at risk.
The Qatar crisis has expanded to the Horn Africa, potentially fueling simmering regional conflicts. Renewed fears of heightened tension in the Horn — a region pockmarked by foreign military bases that straddle key Indian Ocean trade roots with its 4,000-kilometer coastline — were recently sparked by Sudan granting Turkey the right to rebuild a decaying Ottoman port city. The Turks will also construct a naval dock to maintain civilian and military vessels on the African country’s Red Sea coast.
The $650-million agreement was the latest indication that East Africa was being drawn into the Qatar crisis and associated conflicts in the Middle East. Concern has heightened as the Saudi and Emirati-led boycott of Qatar appears to have become the new normal.
Competition for influence between rival Gulf states stretches beyond the Horn — which straddles the strategic Bab-el-Mandeb strait, links the Gulf of Aden with the Red Sea and is plagued by the nearby war in Yemen — into the Sahel as well as Central and West Africa. Qatar’s emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, toured six West African nations in December 2017 to shore up support for his country in its dispute with its Gulf brethren.
Africa is a battlefield not only in the Qatar crisis, but also in the fierce rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran. This is often fought in countries like Nigeria, Senegal, Cameroon and Mauritania, primarily as a sectarian struggle between Sunni and Shia Islam.
The Sudan-Turkey agreement has raised anxiety in capitals on both sides of the Red Sea. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates both worry about Turkish military expansion because of its support for Qatar. Turkey has a military base in the Gulf state and has said it would beef up its presence to 3,000 troops in the coming months. Turkey also has a training base in Somalia and is discussing the establishment of a base in Djibouti, which is the Horn’s rent-a-military base country par excellence. Djibouti has foreign military facilities operated by France, the United States, Saudi Arabia, China and Japan.
Hinting at a link between the Turkish presence in Sudan and Saudi Arabia, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on a visit to the African nation in December — the first by a Turkish head of state — that the ancient port of Suakin would boost tourism and serve as a transit point for pilgrims traveling to the kingdom’s holy city of Mecca. Suakin was Sudan’s major port when it was ruled by the Ottomans, but it fell into disuse over the last century after the construction of Port Sudan, 60 kilometers to the north. Suakin allowed the Ottomans to secure access to what is today the Hejaz province in Saudi Arabia and home to the Red Sea port of Jeddah.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which has bases in Berbera in the breakaway republic of Somaliland and in Eritrea, fear that the agreement will allow Turkey — with whom they have strained relations because of differences over Qatar, Iran and Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood — to station troops close to Jeddah. Saudi Arabia and the UAE suspect Qatar of funding the development of Suakin. Adding to the tension is the fact that Turkey suspects the UAE of having supported a failed military coup in July 2016.
The agreement is even more stinging because relations between Saudi Arabia and Sudan had significantly improved after the African country broke off diplomatic relations with Iran in early 2016 — an early Saudi victory in its fight for Africa with the Islamic Republic. Sudan has since contributed 6,000 troops as well as fighters from the Janjaweed tribal militia to the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen. The Trump administration eased economic sanctions on Sudan in October 2017 at Saudi Arabia’s request.
Saudi Arabia has now agreed to re-establish banking ties with Sudan, despite criticism in the Saudi press and on social media of the Sudanese-Turkish agreement. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has insisted that his country would keep its troops in Yemen irrespective of the agreement.
Concern about the agreement is not limited to Qatar’s detractors in the Gulf. Egypt suspects that the agreement will fuel a border conflict with Sudan over the region of Halayeeb. Sudan recently accused Egypt of deploying troops to the Sudanese side of the border and sending war planes to overfly the coastal area. In December, Sudan complained to the United Nations that a maritime demarcation agreement reached in 2016 by Egypt and Saudi Arabia infringed on what it claimed to be Sudanese waters off Halayeeb.
Impact of Qatar Crisis Widens
Egypt is further worried that mounting tensions will complicate already sharp differences with Sudan as well as Ethiopia over a massive dam that Addis Ababa is building. Egypt believes the dam will reduce its vital share of Nile River water, which is the country’s lifeline. Negotiations over the dam are at an impasse, with Sudan appearing to tilt toward Ethiopia in the dispute.
“Sudanese President Omar Bashir is playing with fire in exchange for dollars. Sudan is violating the rules of history and geography and is conspiring against Egypt under the shadow of Turkish madness, Iranian conspiracy, an Ethiopian scheme to starve Egypt of water, and Qatar’s financing of efforts to undermine Egypt,” charged Emad Adeeb in a column entitled “Omar Bashir’s political suicide.”
The Qatar crisis, even without Turkey joining the fray, was putting fragile peace arrangements in the Horn at risk.
Qatar, in response to Eritrea and Djibouti’s decision to downgrade relations with the Gulf state when the conflict erupted in June 2017, withdrew its peacekeeping contingent of 400 troops from the Red Sea island of Doumeira. Eritrea immediately seized the island, which is also claimed by Djibouti, in a move that could ultimately spark an armed conflict that may draw in Ethiopia.
While reaping the benefits of heightened interest, the Horn risks increased tension and violent conflict in what has become a high stakes chess game for both Middle Eastern and African adversaries. “Post-Arab Spring … activism may unsurprisingly contribute to the militarisation of the Horn of Africa and, even more dangerously, alter the existing balance of power in this conflict-ridden region, warned Patrick Ferras, director of the Horn of Africa Observatory.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.