Climate change news

The Making of BBC’s Planet Earth

Environmental news, Latest environmental news, Environment latest news, Wildlife news, wildlife latest news, BBC news, Latest BBC news, BBC latest news, news around the world, world news

© Azam Kassim

February 27, 2017 12:25 EDT

The newest technology and intimate storytelling combine to bring us the most cinematic nature documentary to date.

There is a good reason why Sir David Attenborough—Britain’s undisputed national treasure—has more titles following his name than one could possibly remember. His voice has given life to some of the best-remembered moments of nature’s cruel beauty, breaking conventions and pioneering ways we look at the world around us.

Starting with Zoo Quest in 1954, Attenborough’s team have without fail been behind revolutionary filmmaking that brought viewers across the world such wonders as The Blue Planet, Life Story and the most recent and stunning masterpiece of Planet Earth II.

Planet Earth, which premiered in 2006, took five years to film across 64 countries and was the most expensive nature series ever produced by the BBC. Breathtaking as it was, its sequel breaks new ground yet to bring us the most cinematic nature documentary to date.

Leaving the early 16mm cameras far behind, Planet Earth II uses the latest technology, some of which only became available in the past few years. Going from static, highly-edited composition dictated by cumbersome camera equipment to the fluid, intimate perfection of the high definition age, the latest BBC Natural History Unit’s project has achieved the seemingly impossible: taking the viewers through what animals might—without trying to sound anthropomorphic—be feeling in their environment.

A journey like no other, technology only plays a part of it. The story behind the often gut-wrenching, nail-biting imagery is what makes the Planet Earth series the success that it is: creating the relatable narrative of a cycle of life full of adversity, danger, perseverance and death.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Azam Kassim

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member