When it comes to agricultural technology, business opportunity is filling the void left by political inertia.
Last month, Extinction Rebellion activists around the world triggered days of protests to end what they call criminal inaction by the world’s governments on climate and ecological emergencies. Disruptive civil disobedience and mass arrests successfully pushed the Scottish and Welsh governments, along with the UK Parliament, to declare national climate emergencies and “tell the truth” about the destruction of the natural world and the food shortages society will face as a result.
The point is clear — climate emergency is a human emergency. Threats posed by mass extinction in the natural world are a risk to human existence, because without it, food production ceases. Farmers are already facing this threat in the form of crop failures and lower yields.
New imagery revealing the stark extent of European farmers’ battle with climate change has been captured by a network of satellites operated by the European Union’s Earth Observation Program, Copernicus. The Copernicus Climate Change Service is one of six initiatives under the program to provide European policymakers and private bodies with climatic information to understand how society will be affected, and what adaptations are required, to ensure EU citizens can continue to enjoy life in a society where, for example, food is in abundance.
Even an untrained eye can see that the satellite images show areas of once green, arable land in 2017 transformed in 2018 into an unusable arid yellow. The chips are in: European climate change is obvious in black and white, or rather in green and yellow, following an 80% drop in the average rainfall across central and northern regions.
The EU’s agricultural system relies on a stable environment to produce the volume of food needed to feed the bloc’s 500 million people. Consistent seasonal temperatures and rainfall permit chosen crops to flourish. Farmers depend on consistency for successful harvests. Changes in climate conditions mean higher temperatures, rainfall fluctuations, as well as more frequent and severe extreme-weather events such as flooding and forest fires, meaning that farmers are no longer being able to rely on the weather.
But couldn’t this be a one-off? According to Bloomberg, Copernicus found last year to be the third hottest on record with changes over the last four decades, showing a “clear warming trend.” This provides policymakers with proof that extreme climate change will require extreme policy change — that is, if governments want food supply to continue to meet demand as the trend worsens.
Unfortunately, on top of testing weather fluctuations, farmers are also contending with adverse environmental changes in soil degradation, decreasing insect populations (which are vital for pollination) and pollution. All of these are compounded and intensified by the effects of climate change — not great news for farmers or for those who expect current food availability to continue in the future. Farmers are, however, not the only warriors in this battle. The agricultural system is part of the problem. Current food production methods are, in part, responsible for these environmental problems. They exacerbate the pressures of climate change due to land use, an overuse of pesticides and monocrop cultures causing pollution, biodiversity loss and high greenhouse gas emissions.
Technology to the rescue?
So, evidence of climate and environmental change is uncompromisingly felt out in the field. What now? With predictions that the global population will increase to 9.8 billion by 2050, the EU is encouraging the use of technology and satellite data to help policymakers and private entities rethink resource management for sustainable food production. Agricultural technology, or agtech, is providing hope that yields can be increased while the exploitation of resources is reduced — or rather made more efficient — by using artificial intelligence along with monitoring and data tools.
Digitization and precision farming practices are, for example, heralded by the EU as critical agricultural sustainability tools. Such methods are expected to reduce inputs of pesticides and water while increasing production by using drones, robots and sensors to closely monitor crop cultivation, helping farmers tailor water and pesticide application. Increased efficiency means less waste and less pollution, as well as giving farmers a greater understanding of crop and soil management during each harvesting season.
Moreover, Copernicus satellite imagery helps farmers make informed decisions on crop options using weather pattern predictions. Even the private sector utilizes the EU program, from managing market risk in certain crops to providing beer brewer Heineken with expertise to minimize water consumption.
Will it be enough?
Digitization may not be fully endorsed under binding EU-wide law, and strong government action around the world is not yet commonplace. However, the agtech industry is paving the way, reaching an all-time high investment of $1.5 billion in 2017. Indeed, in the absence of public policy, Indian farmers are reported to have achieved remarkable food production improvements with the aid of agtech start-ups to help feed the 1.3 billion people dependent on land adversely affected by droughts and rising temperatures.
Innovative start-ups are identifying wide-ranging problems and providing solutions. For example, Phytech provides tailored crop recommendations to farmers via smartphones for optimized irrigation, whereas InspiraFarms uses technology to help farmers tackle the issue of food waste and energy costs, which are also crucial problems in today’s unsustainable agriculture wheel.
Action on climate change has for too long been hindered by contentions about its causes rather than looking for solutions to the changes being witnessed in the field. Now, it would seem, business opportunity is filling that void left by political inertia. Without government action, will agtech incentivize the agricultural revolution devised by the international Lancet Commission that addresses both the global unhealthy diet and farming’s contribution to climate change? Can it change the industry by cutting global meat production to make room for an increase in the production of nutrient-rich nuts, pulses and vegetables? That remains to be seen, but agtech is certainly part of the transition.
*[Correction: An earlier version of this article mistakenly stated that the global population will increase to 9.8 million by 2050.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.