Indian internet arrived in in 1995, and high-speed broadband technologies started only in 2004. Before that, mobilizing mostly took place through informal and clandestine channels. It was only in 1991 that the first Indian organization was formed in London, the Naz Project, which eventually established a presence in Delhi through its sister group, the Naz Foundation, in 1996.cyberspace has evolved drastically over the years. The
India’s COVID-19 Vaccination Drive Is Failing the Transgender Community
The late 1990s were a time when offline contact between Indian for non-sexual purposes was largely unimaginable, possibly because homosexuality itself was still a crime back then. Moreover, public attitudes toward homosexuals were fiercely negative, even among liberals. “When I was active in the women’s movement in Delhi from 1978 to 1990 as founding co-editor of Manushi, ’s first feminist journal, homosexuality was rarely if ever discussed in left-wing, civil rights, or women’s movements, or at Delhi University, where I taught,” recounts historian Ruth Vanita.
Globalization of Gay Rights
With time, things began to change. The policies of globalization, liberalization and privatization of the late 1990s opened up sections of the Indian economy to the world market in novel ways. These policies, which were a part of ’s overall structural adjustment program, marked a tectonic shift from old dirigiste ways of working and heralded a new era of sweeping economic reforms.
A chief consequence of these changes was the information technology boom of the 1990s. Starting in the 1970s, it eventually led the way for the proliferation of new technologies on the Indian market throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s. These included Nokia smartphones, desktop computers like the famed HEC-2M, black-and-white television sets and so on. Over the years, not only did these technologies evolve, but so did their ownership patterns. In 2012, Neilsen reported that the number of smartphone users in urban was approximately 27 million. That number shot up to 76 million in 2013 for urban and rural , and has been rising steadily ever since. By 2025, is projected to have approximately 974 million smartphone users.
These economic changes, however, weren’t merely restricted to urban areas. A 2019 report by the Internet & Mobile Association of and Nielsen found that with 227 million active internet users, rural had already surpassed urban ’s 205 million users. With 504 million active internet users over five years of age in 2019, was the second-largest internet-user market in the world, just behind China with its 850 million users. The United States, by comparison, has 280-300 million users.
What did the changing contours of the digital landscape in permit-license raj began to loosen, activism also witnessed a genesis of sorts. In 1994, AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan (ABVA) filed the first-ever petition in the country’s history against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, an infamous British-era law that criminalized homosexuality in postcolonial .mean for people? The late 1990s were a time when the Indian government finally allowed certain sectors of the economy like IT and telecommunications to engage private investment. As the strangleholds of the erstwhile
Various lesbian support groups also emerged during this time in response to widespread protests by Hindu right-wing groups that displayed violent disdain over the screening of Deepa Mehta’s lesbian romance film, “Fire.”
These changes were intimately related to the economic transformations of the time resulting from the transnational circulation of capital, ideas, people and funding that helped give the movement the impetus it needed to thrive and survive. The advent of rights mobilization in , for instance, arose as a consequence of international funding for HIV/AIDS prevention in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
The easing of certain regulations in the Indian economy and the greater flow of capital and people from abroad also paved the way, directly and indirectly, for the eventual scrapping of Section 377. As one scholar succinctly put it, “ politics in has come to be embroiled in the politics of globalization, and many believe that this history of politics is inseparable from the rise of neoliberal agendas in the Indian sub continent.”
A lot has changed over the years. Most notably, in 2014, NALSA judgment. In 2018, the same court decriminalized homosexuality. By constitutionally recognizing these hitherto delegitimized subjects, the very shape and form of politics had radically transformed. Today, identification in urban pockets is more common than ever before. Corporations have also joined the bandwagon by placating homocapitalist sentiments under the problematic guise of + inclusivity.’s Supreme Court recognized the third gender in its landmark
With the COVID-19 pandemic having haltered in-personevents around the world, much of organizing, dating, socializing and networking has now shifted online. This is a space that continues to boom.
On the one hand, online spaces can be liberating for those who can access them. These spaces promisepeople the possibility of digitally connecting with others with a mere click of a button. This is why the IT boom was so significant: It paved the way for greater internet access and made it possible for marginalized and discreet people to explore their identities in ways their geographic locations wouldn’t otherwise allow.
While no official government data on continue to do so — technology has ushered in what some are calling a “sexual revolution in .” The technological boom has ignited and kindled a new generation of young Indians’ desires for sex, romance, intimacy, and even sex work in unimaginable ways.populations exist (for obvious reasons), and despite the police and the state actively harassing people over the years — even after decriminalization, they
These desires and aspirations are being facilitated through chat rooms, instant messaging applications like WhatsApp and social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat. Indeed, these changes have “teased the imagination of a young , expanding her horizons and aspirations with the click of the button.”
However, such spaces also feature as sites of discrimination, bullying and violence. Take, for instance, Rohit Dasgupta’s assertion in his 2017 book, “Digital Cultures in ,” that “The concept of being ‘too transgressive’ is a growing issue within representations in .” Thus, only certain bodies and identities are typically seen as normative in spaces; for example, men who pass as straight. Those who transgress cis-normative and heteronormative ideals — like effeminate men — are typically shunned by people (mostly men).
It has been argued that even though the 1991 reforms had a positive impact on ’s economic performance, their uneven implementation exacerbated existing socio-cultural inequalities. We see these inequalities manifest in cyberspace today, where certain privileged voices (mostly dominant caste, urbanized and Westernized men) dominate, while others (mostly women, and people from marginalized castes and classes) are systematically silenced by those in power.
On the issue of caste, for example, there is a deafening silence among activists in to even acknowledge the presence of caste inequalities within the movement. This should come as no surprise because most activists in (including the author of this article) belong to oppressor castes. Because of this, the issues, concerns and traumas of people from marginalized castes such as those from Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi communities are sidelined.
While most of this marginalization is implicit, some of it also happens explicitly. Take, for example, writer-director Aroh Akunth’s account of how caste intimately shapes desires on dating platforms. Thus, “attractiveness,” skin color and a “good background” become ideas projected onto a caste, while politics of “respectability” becomes a politics of caste supremacy.
Another pressing issue in right-wing homo-Hindu nationalist aspirations. It should be noted that this problem plagued the movement long before the pandemic pushed everyone online. It’s just that these groups, like many others, have adapted to the new normal by moving online. They fashion themselves as advocates for rights while simultaneously peddling jingoism, Islamophobia anti-Black Lives Matter/Dalit Lives Matter propaganda as well as casteism.cyberspace is the growing popularity of
Take for instance, “hindu_lgbt,” an Instagram handle that affiliates itself with the right-wing Hindu nationalist group, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which supports the decriminalization of homosexuality in but not the legalization of same-sex marriage. As an ideology, Hindu nationalism is premised on the political and cultural construction of citizen-state relationships and subjectivities that are homogenized and in synch with orthodox notions of the Hindu faith, sometimes referred to as Hindutva philosophy.
It should be noted that there are many social formations in spearheaded by the Mahila Aghadi of Shiv Sena, Bajrang Dal and others, while resistance to decriminalize homosexuality in came, in part, from ( ) and RSS ideologues.that support this ideology. The protests against Deepa Mehta’s film “Fire,” for instance, were
However, RSS views of rights have drastically changed over the years — perhaps more so than the views of orthodox Christian and Muslim organizations — partly due to the ruling Hindu nationalist government’s relative silence on the issue, and partly because the RSS is itself trying to grapple with the ongoing social changes in . In order to brand itself as an upholder of “inclusive” traditional family values, the RSS approach seems, on the one hand, to respect the Supreme Court’s judgment on Section 377 while, on the other hand, refuse to support any further legislation, such as the legalization of same-sex marriage, that might radically challenge existing family structures in .
With the third COVID-19 wave expected to hit in the coming months, online spaces will, in all likelihood, continue to facilitate networking for the foreseeable future. But with greater smartphone access and the increased democratization of content creation — what some scholars have called the rise of “web citizenship” — advocacy in contemporary faces newer challenges.
The first is an issue of privacy. In its 2017 Puttaswamy judgment, the Supreme Court of recognized sexual orientation as an intrinsic part of privacy but was silent about its applicability in the online realm, where catfishing and identity theft are rampant. The second is an issue of legality. Digital spaces transcend the boundaries of nation-states, thereby calling into question the juridical purview of national privacy and security laws. How do people facing harassment, bullying and extortion from international actors report such crimes to the police in ?
A contemporary example of this was the infamous gay marriage scam, as detailed in a UK-based investigation by VICE. This expose sent shockwaves through sections of the circles both in and abroad, bringing to the fore the inadequacy of Indian laws, which, unlike those in the UK, neither recognize marriage nor extortion that specifically targets populations.
Themovement in is currently at a crossroads. On the one hand, it has to tackle the increasing popularity of right-wing Hindu nationalist sentiments; on the other, manage the tensions and contradictions associated with Indian law.
Indeed, the challenges are many and the means to address them are few. One way of effecting change is by pursuing the law and lobbying lawmakers like Dr. Shashi Tharoor of the Indian National Congress, Supriya Sule of the Nationalist Congress Party and Tejasvi Surya of the ruling Arvind Narrain, are less skeptical. To date, this dispute remains unsettled — as does the inclusion of the into this discussion., all of whom have expressed support for rights in . While some scholars are skeptical of using the law as a vehicle for bringing about social change in , others, like
The other way of effecting change is by radically reimaginingspaces as zones where people of all identities can be made to feel safer. This exercise is perhaps harder to carry out because it has no prescriptions and is contingent on the ability of privileged to self-reflect. Thus, would dominant-caste men be willing to cede space to marginalized-caste women and people? We should hope so. All in all, cyberspace in is both a stuffy and an expansive zone. Its contradictions and contestations make it an exciting site for further scholarship into mobilization in .
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money. Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.