Of late, statements from the highest level in Pakistan’s government have urged the global community to build a relationship with the country centered around “geoeconomic security.” The new policy posture is aimed at the Biden administration, but it appears in equal proportion in Pakistan’s recent diplomatic overtures to other countries.
In the past, Pakistan’s global pitch was peppered with terms such as “geostrategic pivot” — an umbrella concept for military and security nuances — to emphasize its indispensability in South Asia. This predisposition informed the overall trajectory of the– relationship since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, as well as the burgeoning – bonhomie that has manifested through the – Economic Corridor (CPEC).
What an Afghan Peace Deal Could Look Like
Pakistan’s sojourn from “geostrategy” to “geoeconomics” is led by the country’s speech at the Wilson Center in January, Yusuf reminded the that it would be engaging with a “very different ” that is now focused on the “economic security paradigm.” He said should be seen beyond the Afghanistan “prism” as an economic partner. He also cautioned against viewing from a “third country lens and keeping at the center of all conversations.”adviser, Moeed Yusuf. In his
Similar sentiments were echoed later during the launch of a report titled, “Pak-Americana — Ushering in a New Era of – . Relations,” published by Tabadlab, an -based think tank. The speakers at the event unerringly ground the future of – relations in economic terms. This paradigm shift was also mentioned by Prime Minister during his recent trip to Sri Lanka, which he invited to join the CPEC.
Interestingly, Pakistan’s new pitch has also gone in lockstep with recent international publications. For example, writing for the Atlantic Council, Shamila Chaudhary and Vali Nasr have argued that Pakistan’s strategic calculus has changed over the years and policy toward the country should be informed by considerations of a broad-based economic partnership.
The underlying driver behind these new policy utterances could be the attempted pushback against entrenched perceptions in relationship has been largely about the South Asian nation conducting counterterrorism operations and supporting military action in Afghanistan. Lately, has been trying to put an end to the 20-year-long war in Afghanistan to help the extricate itself from the Afghan imbroglio.policy circles where has been viewed with suspicion. In the best of times, has been seen as a security hedge for protecting regional interests. Since 9/11, the –
It is therefore no surprise that misconception that Pakistan’s relationship with is a bar to broader – cooperation. The thrust is to decouple Pakistan’s relationship with and to showcase it as a “neutral” partner of the .’s geoeconomic messaging attempts to clear the air about the
What possibly ungirds Pakistan’s embrace of geoeconomics? After all, this would be a major breakaway from entrenched patterns of the past. animus toward the CPEC, which she vehemently criticized for its “predatory loans” and “lack of transparency.”is perceived to firmly reside in the Chinese camp, which explains former Assistant Secretary of State Alice Wells’
Despite gray list since June 2018. With peace in Afghanistan also a distant prospect, Pakistan’s strategic choices made over the years seem to have outlived their utility.and embarking on the ambitious CPEC some seven years ago, the economy remains its Achilles’ heel. A quick economic turnaround does not seem to be on the horizon with the country on the Financial Action Task Force’s
It is perhaps in this context thathas realized that stale policy positions need to be discarded. A realization seems to have crept in that if is to resurrect its economy and, concomitantly, enhance its global stature, it would have to appear “sexy” and offer the world something more than its geostrategic location.
Giving It Some Thought
If this policy direction is meaningfully implemented, it augurs well for Pakistan’s future. However, to convince the world to view it from a new lens, the country will need to give a concrete direction to this new strand of thought.
First,will have to provide an equal opportunity level playing field to all countries looking to develop a broader economic relationship with it. This will mean undoing the perception of elusiveness surrounding CPEC and the “guilt-by-association” blemish on that is largely the result of the broader – power rivalry. It would be equally important for to balance things out vis-à-vis , which now has deeply entrenched strategic and economic interests in .
Second, Pakistan’s-centric lens that has only blurred its policy vision will need to change. This will require to delink its relationship with the and other countries from , in the same vein that those countries have delinked their relationship from their relationship with . The increasing coziness between the and is a reality that cannot wish away. Despite the animosity with , must never close the door for dialogue because a sustainable geoeconomic integration will eventually require an – thaw. The recent announcement by top military officials of and to strictly observe all agreements and the ceasefire along the Line of Control — the frontier that separates Indian-controlled and -controlled parts of Kashmir — is a much-needed respite.
Faced with some cold, hard facts,seems to be undergoing a policy catharsis. Instead of getting sucked into global and regional power rivalries, it has wisely extended an olive branch to the and the world at large. It is too early in the day to know how Pakistan’s new strategic posture will interact with political developments in South Asia. However, for its geoeconomics foray to be truly protean in nature, Pakistan’s best bet is to become a regional bridge of connectivity that is firmly hinged on transnational economic pursuits, instead of being tethered to stale hyperbolic policy postures that have led the country nowhere.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.