Last year’s lowlights from world politics, the culture wars and the military-industrial complex.
Each year, Conn Hallinan gives awards to individuals, companies and governments that make reading the news a daily adventure. Here are the awards for 2016.
The Golden Lemon Award
The Golden Lemon Award had a number of strong contenders in 2016, including:
1) General Atomics for its MQ-9 Reaper armed drone, which has a faulty starter-generator that routinely shorts out the aircraft. So far, no one can figure out why. Some 20 were either destroyed or sustained major damage in 2015. The Reapers costs $64 million apiece.
2) Panavia Aircraft Company’s $25 billion Tornado fighter-bomber that can’t fly at night because the cockpit lights blind the pilot. A runner up here is the German arms company Heckler & Koch, whose G-36 assault rifle can’t shoot straight when the weather is hot.
3) The British company BAE’s $1.26 billion Type 45 destroyer that breaks down “whenever we try to do too much with them,” a Royal Navy officer told the Financial Times. Engaging in combat, he said, would be “catastrophic.”
But the hands down winner is Lockheed Martin, builder of the F-35 Lightning stealth fighter. At a cost of $1.5 trillion, it’s the most expensive weapons system in US history.
Aside from numerous software problems, pilots who try to bail out risk decapitation. The director of operational test and evaluation recently released an assessment of the F-35’s performance that states, “In an opposed combat scenario,” the “aircraft would need to avoid threat engagement and would require augmentation by other friendly forces.”
Translation: “If the bad guys show up, run for your life and pray your buddies arrive to bail you out of trouble.”
Lockheed Martin also gets an Honorable Mention for its $4.4 billion littoral combat ship, the USS Zumwalt, which had to be towed out of the Panama Canal. The ship also leaks, as do other sister littoral combat ships, including the USS Freedom.
Note: US students are currently $1.3 trillion in debt.
The Dr. Frankenstein Award
The Dr. Frankenstein Award to the US Air Force for zapping the brains of drone operators with electricity in order to improve their focus.
The electrical stimulation was started after scientists discovered that feeding the pilots Provigil and Ritalin was a bad idea, because both drugs are highly addictive and Provigil can permanently damage sleep patterns.
Nika Knight of Common Dreams reports that “European researchers who studied the brain-zapping technique years ago warned that the technology is, in fact, extremely invasive, as its effects tend to ‘spread from the target brain area to neighboring areas.’”
The Golden Jackal Award
The Golden Jackal Award goes to United Kingdom oil companies BP and Royal Dutch Shell for their lobbying campaign following the US invasion of Iraq. Executives of the companies met with UK Trade Minister Baroness Elizabeth Symons five months before the US attack to complain that the Americans were cutting them out of the post-war loot.
According to Parliament’s 2016 Chilcot Report on the Iraq War, Symons then met with Prime Minister Tony Blair’s foreign secretary, Jack Straw, to tell him it was a “matter of urgency,” and that “British interests are being left to one side.” Straw dutifully told Blair to raise the issue “very forcefully” with President George W. Bush, because US companies are “ruthless” and “will not help UK companies unless you play hardball with Bush.”
Runner up in this category is The Washington Post, which won a Pulitzer Prize in Public Service journalism for publishing Edward Snowden’s revelations about illegal US wiretapping and then called for the whistleblower himself to be charged with espionage.
Glenn Greenwald—who met with Snowden and wrote stories about the scandal for The Guardian—summed it up: “The Washington Post has achieved an ignominious feat in US media history: the first-ever paper to explicitly editorialize for the criminal prosecution of its own source … That is warped beyond anything that can be described.”
The Thin Skin Award
The Thin Skin Award is a five-way tie among the governments of Spain, India, Israel, Turkey and Thailand:
Spain: Under Spain’s 2015 public security law—nicknamed the “gag rule”—police are trying to fine a woman for carrying a bag on which was written “All Cats Are Beautiful.” The police say that the writing and color of the bag is “traditionally associated with insults to the police” and that the four capital letters really mean “All Cops Are Bastards.”
India: The right-wing government of Narendra Modi is proposing a law that would make it illegal to publish any map indicating that Kashmir is disputed territory divided between India and Pakistan. Currently, such maps are censored by either preventing the publication’s distribution or covering the maps with black stickers. The new law would fine violators $15 million and jail them for up to seven years.
Israel: The Ministry of Education has removed a novel—Borderlife by Dorit Rabinyan, about a romance between a Jewish woman and a Palestinian man—from the list of required reading for Hebrew high schools literature classes. Education official Dalia Fenig says, “Marrying a non-Jew is not what the education system is educating about.”
Turkey: In the aftermath of a failed coup in July 2016, novelist and journalist Ahmet Alten and his brother Mehmet, a professor of economics, were arrested for “colluding with the military” even though both men are known to be sharp critics of the Turkish armed forces. The prosecutor had no evidence against the men, but charged them with giving “subliminal” and “subconscious” messages backing the coup during a TV talk show.
The authorities also closed down the Smurfs, Maya the Bee and SpongeBob SquarePants, because the cartoon characters were speaking Kurdish on Zarok TV, a station that does programming in the Kurdish language. According to Al-Monitor, “Many social media users went into lampoon mode, asking, ‘Who is the separatist: SpongeBob or Papa Smurf?’”
Thailand: Patnaree Chankij, a 40-year-old maid, is to be tried by a military court for breaking the country’s lèse-majesté law that makes it a crime to insult the royal family or their pets. She replied “ja” (“yeah”) to a private post sent to her on Facebook. She did not agree with the post, comment on it or make it public. One man is currently serving a 30-year sentence for posting material critical of the Thai royal family.
Following the military coup two years ago, the authorities have filed 57 such cases, 44 of them for online commentary. One person was arrested for insulting the king’s dog.
The Cultural Sensitivity Award
The Cultural Sensitivity Award goes to Denmark, France and Latvia.
The center-right Danish government, which relies on the racist Danish People’s Party to stay in government, passed a law in 2016 that confiscates valuables, including jewels and cash, from refugees. Immigrants can only keep up to $1,455.
The Danish town of Randers also required pork to be used in all public day care centers and kindergartens in a measure the Socialist People’s Party (SPP) charges is aimed at Muslims. “What do children need? Do they need pork? Actually not,” said Charlotte Molbaek, a Randers Town Council member from the SPP. “Children need grownups.”
Several French towns run by right-wing mayors have removed alternatives—like fish or chicken—from school menus when pork is served. On those days, Muslim and Jewish children eat vegetables.
The right-wing government of Latvia is banning the wearing of full veils, in spite of that fact that, at last count, there were three such women in the whole country. Former Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga told The New York Times, “Anybody could be under a veil or under a burqa. You could carry a rocket launcher under your veil.”
A runner up in this category is former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice who, during a speech in Kiev, said that Ukrainians should stop complaining about the economic crisis that has gripped the country since the 2014 coup that overthrew President Viktor Yanukovych. “Anyone who believes that life is bad in Ukraine should go to Liberia, where the standard of living is much lower, and then you will be thankful.”
The Head in the Sand Award
The Head in the Sand Award to British Prime Minister Theresa May for closing down the government’s program to study climate change. A co-winner is the conservative government of Australia, which laid off 275 scientists from its climate change program. Some were rehired after an international petition campaign, but the leading international researcher on sea levels—John Church—was let go permanently.
In the meantime, the US Air Force is spending $1 billion to build a radar installation in Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. The atoll lies halfway between Australia and Hawaii and is only a few feet above sea level. It is estimated that sea levels will rise at least six feet by 2100, but the increase is moving far faster than scientists predicted. “The future does not look very good for those islands,” says Curt Storlazzi, an oceanographer with the US Geological Service.
The Little Bo Peep Award
The Little Bo Peep Award goes to the US Department of Defense for being unable to account for $6.5 trillion in spending. Yes, that is a “T.”
According to Mandy Smithberger, director of Straus Military Reform Project at the Project On Government Oversight, “Accounting at the Department of Defense is a disaster, but nobody is screaming about it because you have a lot of people in Congress who believe in more military spending.”
According to UK watchdog group Action on Armed Violence, the Pentagon also can’t account for 1.4 million guns it shipped to Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) won some laurels in this category as well. According to an investigation by Al Jazeera and The New York Times, Jordanian intelligence operatives stole millions of dollars in US weapons bound for Syria. Some of the guns were used to kill Americans at a police training school in Amman.
The Annie Oakley Award
The Annie Oakley Award goes to American firearms manufacturers and the National Rifle Association (NRA) for their campaign to arm kids. The guns for tots are lighter than regular firearms and have less recoil. They are also made in “kid-friendly” colors, like pink.
Iowa recently passed legislation making it legal for any minor to own a pistol. According to State Representative Kirsten Running, the law “allows for one-year olds, two-year olds, three-year olds, four-year olds to operate handguns,” adding, “We do not need a militia of toddlers.”
The Violence Policy Center reports: “As household gun ownership has steadily declined and the primary gun market of white males continues to age, the firearms industry has set its sights on America’s children. Much like the tobacco industry’s search for replacement smokers, the gun industry is seeking replacement shooters.”
If your 2-year old is packing and really wants that Star Wars droid, I recommend you buy it.
*[This article was originally published by FPIF.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: Pick-uppath
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.