FO° Talks: America's New Fast-Changing Role in the Middle East Part 2

The United States’ role in the Middle East took a turn in the early 2000s after the Bush administration's War on Terror. The disastrous US invasion of Iraq changed the public perception of the US’ role. While the Obama administration attempted to pivot to Asia, the 2011 Arab Spring, the Syrian Civil War and the ISIS emergency required reentry. At the same time, the domestic fracking boom brought some self-sufficiency in terms of fossil fuels.

Check out our comment feature!

[See also: FO° Talks: America's New Fast-Changing Role in the Middle East, Part 1]

In the early 2000s, the United States' hegemonic position in the Middle East changed. The 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union eliminated the need to contain communist influence and decreased the urgency of refereeing regional disagreements or addressing the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

However, the Middle East came sharply into focus when the Sunni extremist group al-Qaeda orchestrated the 9/11 terrorist attacks on US soil, killing 2,977. The George W. Bush administration declared a “War on Terror,” training its guns not only on groups like al-Qaeda but also states like Baathist dictator Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Claiming that Saddam was hiding weapons of mass destruction, the US invaded Iraq in 2003 and toppled his regime.

With the invasion, the generally successful half-century of US foreign policy in the Middle East that had begun with the 1953 Iranian coup d'état came to a close. The US found itself mired in a destabilized Iraq, unable to pull out as the newly installed democratic government could not combat Islamist insurgencies on its own.

Disengagement and reengagement

The Barack Obama administration attempt to reduce Middle East involvement and “pivot towards Asia.” The rise of the brutal and initially successful Sunni terrorist group ISIS, the 2011 Arab Spring and the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War prevented the US from disengaging. Obama did make progress by striking a deal with Iran, agreeing to lift financial sanctions in exchange for the cessation of the Islamic republic’s nuclear program. However, Obama’s successor Donald Trump later scrapped the deal.

Despite these setbacks, the US succeeded in protecting its interests while attempting to resolve regional wars and the enduring Arab–Israeli conflict. The Trump administration brokered the Abraham Accords, in which Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) normalized ties with Israel. Morocco soon followed suit. Saudi Arabia also entered negotiations with Israel, but the prospect of normalization stalled following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent Israeli invasion of Gaza. Since the war broke out, the US has seen decreased popularity among Arab populations as they blamed the hegemonic power for backing up what they saw as Zionist aggression in Palestine. However, a bilateral security agreement between the US and Saudi Arabia remains possible.

In recent years, the US reduced its dependency on imported fuels by exploiting its own fossil fuel reserves. The US is rich in oil and natural gas, but they are usually in a form that requires more effort to extract than in the Middle East. Fracking and other technological advancements have helped close this gap. However, Saudi Arabia continues to be the biggest figure in oil production.

The region continues to evolve. Gone is the binary US–Soviet dynamic, and gone, too, is unipolar US preponderance. More independent actors like China, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the UAE now shape the region. China, heavily reliant on Middle Eastern oil, is increasing its economic and political presence.

Domestically, American attitudes toward the Middle East are also in flux. Younger Americans are growing more critical of Israel. Having grown up during the Iraq War, this generation is leery of US involvement in the region. For now, though, the US continues to prioritize regional stability, oil price stability and containment of Iranian influence in its Middle East policy.

[Tara Yarwais wrote the first draft of this piece.]

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO° Talks: RDC, Rwanda and M23 Rebels

FO° Talks: The Culture of Culture, Part 2: Memory, Melody and a Forgotten Opera

April 27, 2025

FO° Talks: How India’s NASSCOM Was Born

April 26, 2025

FO° Talks: Why the Media Buried the Truth, the JFK Files

April 21, 2025

FO° Talks: The Culture of Culture, Part 1: The Classical Music Concert

April 20, 2025

FO° Talks: International Law in the New Donald Trump 2.0 World

April 19, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 9: Predicting Syria’s Future

April 18, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 8: Unstable Political Structures

April 13, 2025

FO° Talks: The Culture of Culture, Part 3: In the Beginning, There Was Silence

April 12, 2025

FO° Talks: The New Geopolitical Landscape of the Middle East Writeup

April 11, 2025

FO° Exclusive: New Troubles in Gaza, Israel, Syria and Turkey

April 09, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 7: The Israeli–Syrian Connection Continued

April 08, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Germany’s Radical New Economic Policy

April 07, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 6: The Israeli–Syrian Connection

April 06, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Risk of US Recession Now Rises in 2025

April 05, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 5: Iranian Alliance and Investment

April 04, 2025

Vice President J.D. Vance Disregards Greenland’s Right to Self-Rule

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 4: Iran’s Shia Crescent

March 31, 2025

FO° Talks: Trump, NATO, Russia-Ukraine War: A Swiss View on the New World in 2025

March 30, 2025

FO° Talks: Josef Olmert on Syria, Part 3: Turkey and the Kurdish Issue

March 29, 2025

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA