The cowboy culture of Silicon Valley makes people hardworking, innovative and passionate, but also obsessive, domineering and ruthless.
This week, US President Donald Trump gave an address before a joint session of Congress. He spoke largely in clichés and claimed the US was witnessing “the renewal of the American spirit.” Of course, he threw red meat to his supporters. Enforcing immigration laws was a part of Trump’s speech, and Republicans erupted in applause when he spoke of repealing and replacing Obamacare. More significantly, Trump promised $1 trillion for infrastructure, a marked difference to the 1996 State of the Union joint address when Bill Clinton declared that “the era of big Government [was] over.”
Trump was calm and composed throughout the speech. One would have assumed that the specter of what Anthony Zurcher called “a kinder, gentler president” might finally begin to surface. However, as the ancient Greeks once said, a leopard cannot change his spots. Trump went back to his high decibel rabble rousing ways. On March 4, the owner of Mar-a-Lago tweeted that Barack Obama had Trump’s “wires tapped” during the election campaign. He ludicrously claimed this was McCarthyism.
Even as bitter divisions roil American politics, Somalia is facing mass starvation. A prolonged drought has left half the country seeking food assistance and “sparked fears of a potential famine.” The last famine in 2011 killed about 260,000 people. According to the World Health Organization, more than 6.2 million Somalis need urgent humanitarian aid.
Despite such developments around the world, it is Travis Kalanick, the CEO of Uber, who takes center stage this week. Sitting between two women, Kalanick was having a jolly good time. When they got to their destination, their Uber driver told Kalanick that he was “raising the standards” and “dropping the price.” The driver claimed he was bankrupt because of Kalanick. The CEO departed by saying, “Some people don’t like to take responsibility for their own shit. They blame everything in their life on somebody else. Good luck!”
UBER, ÜBERMENSCH AND UNTERMENSCH
For the few who do not really use smartphones like this author’s parents, Uber is a mobile app — i.e. software designed to run on mobile phones. When you open Uber on your phone, you can find cars close by that can ferry you wherever you want, except perhaps the moon.
Even in India, Uber is present in nearly every city this author shows up in. Uber is cheap, convenient, comfortable, quick and reliable. Nearly everyone with a mobile phone uses it. Consumers tend to love Uber. Unsurprisingly, the company has become a global behemoth that operates in more than 400 cities worldwide. It might not be Apple, Google or Facebook yet, but it is smashing Silicon Valley success.
As per Reuters, Uber is valued at $70 billion in private markets. Uber’s business is growing, week after week, month after month. It is headquartered on San Francisco’s swanky Market Street. More than 11,000 people work under Kalanick and millions of drivers ferry passengers around for his company. As of October 19, 2016, Uber had more than 40 million monthly active riders worldwide.
Uber provides an added benefit. It is able to optimize the use of cars. Earlier, cars sat around far too long in parking lots. Customers waited for taxis endlessly and taxis hunted for customers exasperatingly. Uber matches demand with supply at all hours of the day and night. Its app is easy to use and its algorithms work brilliantly. It is yet another example of supremely impressive innovation in the peerless San Francisco Bay Area teeming with entrepreneurs, technologists and venture capitalists.
Yet, like the moon, Uber has its dark craters too. The company offers cheap rides partly because it squeezes drivers. This has been the near universal refrain from every Uber driver in India. In Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar, this author prefers to use Ghanshyambhai, an auto rickshaw driver, instead of Uber. Using Uber may be cheaper, but this author prefers to pay a bit more directly to a rather decent driver he knows well.
Even in swanky San Francisco, Uber drivers are apparently feeling the pinch. Eric Newcomer reports for Bloomberg that the cost of riding in a fancy Uber Black has gone down from $4.90 per mile or $1.25 per minute in 2012 to $3.75 per mile and $0.65 per minute today. These drivers are independent contractors who get no health care or other benefits unlike Uber employees.
Some drivers like the one who drove Kalanick are going through hard times. Some customers, employees and the CEO of Uber might say this is because such drivers could not compete. Restaurants close every day and millions of businesses fail. Those who make poor financial decisions should go bankrupt just as the drought-ridded Somalis who did not save for the proverbial rainy day deserve to starve. Übermensch win, untermensch lose. That is just the way of the world.
Of late, Uber and Kalanick have suffered some setbacks. Many Uber users were not thrilled when Kalanick joined Trump’s advisory council. He resigned only after public outrage threatened to hurt Uber. One of Trump’s executive orders barred entry of refugees to the US. Taxi drivers in New York went on strike, refusing to pick up passengers at John F. Kennedy International Airport. While taxi drivers were on strike, Uber stopped its surge pricing that raises fares when demand increases. It gave the impression that Uber was profiting off the strike if not colluding with the Trump administration to break it.
Newcomer does a thorough job of sketching some of the recent scrapes that Uber has been going through. They include illegally operating self-driving cars in San Francisco to undermining a New York taxi union strike protesting Trump’s refugee ban. More scandalously, Susan J. Fowler wrote a scathing blog post about sexual harassment and sexism at Uber. It is unsurprising that many have accused Kalanick of fostering a “reckless company culture” at Uber.
Fowler’s story offers some insights into Uber’s oft criticized culture. In her blog post, Fowler detailed how Uber’s human resources department had protected her boss who tried to get her “to have sex with him.” She encountered persistent sexism in the company, where only 3% of the over 150 engineers are women. Furthermore, it seems that Fowler was penalized and victimized for speaking up. Fowler also wrote about “a game-of-thrones political war raging within the ranks of upper management,” of projects abandoned for no rhyme or reason, of engineers living under fear that their teams would be dissolved and a constant stream of new projects with impossible deadlines. This star engineer damned Uber as “an organization in complete, unrelenting chaos.”
Yet, despite all the discrimination and chaos, Fowler is grateful that she worked with “some of the most amazing engineers in the Bay Area.” These engineers kept “each other sane, kept the gigantic Uber ecosystem running, and told ourselves that it would eventually get better.” Eventually, Fowler could no longer deal with the sexism in the organization and left when Uber’s big bosses took no action against another manager who had threatened to fire her in flagrant breach of the law for raising issues with human resources.
Many argue that the cowboy culture in Silicon Valley allows risk taking, innovation and relentless expansion. If entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg and Travis Kalanick did not push boundaries, there would be no Apple, no Facebook and no Uber. Silicon Valley works because entrepreneurs have the freedom to swing for the fences and hit the home run. If they make mistakes along the way, shoot from the hip and are bit edgy or wild, that is okay.
THE DARK SIDE OF SILICON VALLEY
The April 24, 2016, edition of The World This Week examined “the cult of success and the worship of Übermensch” that pervades the US in general and Silicon Valley in particular. This cult and its attendant worship is an article of faith. Just as some believe the Gita, Bible or the Quran to be the word of god, many Americans, especially in Silicon Valley, believe that markets weigh and measure human worth most accurately. It is this belief that underpins the ferocious drive to succeed in Wall Street and Silicon Valley.
American media has made much ado about Kalanick’s “pugnacious personality and short temper,” but the issue is the culture he operates in, not the Uber CEO himself. Kalanick has a point when he tells the driver that he had to beat the competition. Like Facebook, Uber is a network business. The more passengers it has, the more drivers will flock to it. The more drivers it has, the more passengers will use Uber. The faster the company grows, the more money investors will throw at it. Kalanick is operating in a world where he will be dead if he does not win. Therefore, he rides roughshod over regulators, competitors, drivers and perhaps even employees.
In Silicon Valley, scale is the name of the game. Running a restaurant is for morons. As Peter Thiel would say, creating Facebook is the smart thing to do. This makes competition even more cutthroat than Wall Street. CEOs are wired to win. Their role models are empire builders. Venture capitalists seek out potential Googles. Those who work in Silicon Valley tend to be hardworking, innovative and passionate. They can also be obsessive, domineering and ruthless.
Today, Silicon Valley has acquired far too much power, privilege and wealth. Google owns our data, Facebook knows our lives inside out and Uber is our way to get from one place to another. This has happened because each of these companies has fulfilled deep-seated human needs and wants. Each of these companies has impressive CEOs like Kalanick and brilliant employees like Fowler. They are the big winners of the modern global economy.
Yet Silicon Valley companies are not the first ones to win bigtime. Lest we forget, the first joint stock company in the world was the Dutch East India Company. Soon, others followed such as the British East India Company. They competed to control the trade with Asia. Because they had better technologies than those who were black, brown or yellow, they soon controlled the high seas. Cannons and guns proved quite useful against the darker-skinned natives. Soon enough, these companies did rather well for themselves.
Like Silicon Valley CEOs, people like Robert Clive were meeting needs and wants of their customers. Clive began the British conquest of India to maximize profits for his company’s shareholders. A company that began by importing spices and textiles from India into the UK soon graduated to exporting opium from India to China. Thiel, Zuckerberg and Kalanick might argue this was rather good in the long run. It led to economic growth, modern education and the spread of technology.
Many would demur. They would argue that the companies that acquired colonies were good neither for the short nor the long run. Under their rule, mass exploitation and death by starvation of the natives were not uncommon. They left their colonies mired in poverty, stagnation and social stratification.
For all the inhuman exploitation of these companies, it is important to remember that they were not staffed by pantomime villains. Some fine men worked for these companies, including the author of On Liberty, John Stuart Mill. Yet this did not make these companies humane. As the European companies of a bygone era demonstrate, the quest for power, privilege and wealth can be corrosive to the human soul. Silicon Valley is no exception.
*[You can receive “The World This Week” directly in your inbox by subscribing to our mailing list. Simply visit Fair Observer and enter your email address in the space provided. Meanwhile, please find below five of our finest articles for the week.]
Trump vs. Buffett: The Two Sides of Billionaire Culture
Even while criticizing the wealthy and suspecting them of undermining democracy, Americans need to believe that money doesn’t necessarily corrupt.
This year may be remembered as either the beginning or the end of the golden age of billionaires. One has miraculously become president of the United States. According to Oxfam, the eight richest billionaires in the world hold as much wealth as the poorer half of humanity. One of those eight, Warren Buffett, has recently been canonized—almost synchronously with President Donald Trump’s inauguration—in a rather hagiographic HBO documentary that retraces Buffett’s career, painting the portrait of an American icon known especially for being consistently at or near the top of the billionaire class, but in many respects the diametrical opposite of Trump.
The documentary is now available on the web. It uses Buffett’s own voice, complemented by the voices of family members and business partners, to establish the portrait of a man it seeks to celebrate… Read more
War Reporting and the Stories That Can’t Be Told
War reporting is part of something that can act as an antidote to war—good diplomacy, armed with good facts.
Wars have been reported since antiquity. However, they have been reported by participants who, like Thucydides and Xenophon in the Peloponnesian War in the 400s BC, added strategic commentary and philosophic reflection. The Melian Dialogue in the work of Thucydides, about a small state wishing to surrender to the Athenians—who still wish nevertheless to crush it simply because that is the vocation of stronger states—remains the starting point for today’s academic study of international relations.
Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars was, until the end of the 20th century, the Latin text every schoolchild studying classics had to translate. The amazing thing is that, despite his sense of achievement and lack of modesty, Caesar’s account was quite dispassionate in attributing success to his own military genius. There was no arrant boasting. We accepted he was a force of… Read more
Pakistan: Time for Reform in the Garrison State
It is now entirely up to Pakistan’s leaders to opt out of ideological politics and choose enlightened pragmatism.
In December 2008, I met General Pervez Musharraf at the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) house in Rawalpindi. The meeting was arranged by a mutual friend, retired Colonel Aslam Cheema. Musharraf had only recently stepped down as president of Pakistan. We had a very pleasant conversation for about an hour. The bottom line in his review of the situation was that as long as the Pakistan military was strong, the existence and integrity of Pakistan were assured.
Some would question this thesis keeping in mind what happened in the former East Pakistan in 1971, when it broke away after a bitter and bloody civil war. Musharraf was probably thinking of the Pakistan that survived in the western wing, where the real strength of the Pakistan military has always resided. It is, however, doubtful if the strong military imperative must necessarily… Read more
The Pitfalls of China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative
To succeed, China must start acting like a player instead of an economic sugar daddy that hides behind the principle of non-interference.
Troubled ports in Pakistan and Sri Lanka—envisioned as part of China’s string of pearls linking the Eurasian heartland to the Middle Kingdom—exemplify political pitfalls that threaten Beijing’s ambitious One Belt, One Road project. Political violence over the past decade has stopped Pakistan’s Gwadar port from emerging as a major trans-shipment hub in Chinese trade and energy supplies, while turmoil in Sri Lanka threatens to dissuade Chinese investors from sinking billions into the country’s struggling Hambantota port and planned economic hub.
The problems of both ports serve as pointers to simmering discontent and potential resistance to China’s ploy for dominance through cross-continental infrastructure linkage across a swath of land that is restive and ripe for political change. In December 2016, Chinese, Pakistani and Russian officials warned that militant groups in Afghanistan, including the Islamic State… Read more
Building Responsibly is the Way Forward
Engineering and construction firms join forces to protect workers in their supply chains.
This week, six major engineering and construction companies—CH2M Hill, Vinci SA, Amec Foster Wheeler, Bechtel Corporation, Fluor Corporation and Multiplex—are hosting the inaugural meeting of a new industry-led coalition called Building Responsibly. The group will focus on the rights of workers in global construction supply chains, including those rights related to the recruitment of these workers, to their living and working conditions, and to subcontractor management.
The formation of Building Responsibly represents an important first step forward for an industry that has been slow to address labor rights issues, especially in the Arabian Gulf region. Other engineering and construction firms around the world should join this new initiative. Collaborations like this can promote the sharing of best practices and the development of common industry standards and metrics. Over the past 20 years, as global supply chains have grown increasingly complex, a number of… Read more
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: nycshooter
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.