Trade and Investment Pact is Good News for Europe

David Cameron, Barack Obama, Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande


October 14, 2015 10:27 EDT

An agreement between the US and European Union would have benefits for both sides of the Atlantic, says former Prime Minister John Bruton.

A crucial negotiating session will take place in Miami between October 19-23 on the terms of a possible US-European Union trade and investment pact.

An independent study by Copenhagen Economics has calculated that a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) would add 1.1% to Ireland’s GDP. This is twice the rate of gain that would be experienced by the European Union (EU) as a whole.

I spoke recently at a seminar organized by the European Ideas Network (EIN), which is a think tank associated with the parliamentary group of the European Peoples Party, the biggest party in the European Parliament. I said the TTIP would be good for Europe because:

1) It would reduce the cost of regulation by eliminating the necessity for duplicate standard setting and inspection regimes, the cost of which has to be met by the consumer without any compensating benefit.

2) The reductions in the cost of regulation would disproportionately help small and medium-sized businesses to break into the transatlantic market. The present duplicative system acts as a barrier to entry and helps bigger, well-established companies keep markets to themselves.

3) It would open the US Federal, State and local governments market to European tenders, who are now discriminated against by “buy America” rules, which deliver poor value to US taxpayers.

4) It would help high tech start-up businesses on both sides of the Atlantic by creating a single market of almost 1 billion consumers.

5) It would help to keep Britain in the EU, in order for it to access this market. A failure to conclude the TTIP could, on the other hand, push the United Kingdom toward the exit, on the supposition that it might be able to negotiate better on its own.

6) It would give a confidence boost to the global economy at a time when the burden of debt precludes other forms of stimulus.

There is, unfortunately, quite a bit of opposition, particularly in Germany and Austria, to the conclusion of the TTIP. This seems to be linked to a general suspicion of globalization and a perception that it adds to inequality.

Austrians are 53% to 35% against, Germans 41% to 39% and Luxembourgers 43% to 40%. The rest of the EU is pretty overwhelmingly in favor, with the biggest backers in Ireland and Denmark at 71%.

On the far side of the Atlantic, trade is not a big deal for Americans. Their concerns, according the Pew Research Center, remain international terrorism and building up their own economy—69% of Americans under 28 believe trade deals are good, compared to only 50% of over 65-year-olds.

Interestingly, 59% of Democrats favor concluding the TTIP, whereas only 45% of Republican voters do so. This is in opposition to the traditional position of the US Congress, where Republican Congress members generally favor free trade and Democrats often do not.

US public opinion will be less willing to accept European standards until the trust, damaged by the Volkswagen and LIBOR scandals, is repaired.

It is also important to recognize that differing standards sometimes reflect genuine differences in priorities among populations. For example, Europeans put a higher value on data privacy. Americans probably put a higher value on national security.

So, the negotiations will be intensely political.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Pete Souza

Fair Observer - World News, Politics, Economics, Business and CultureWe bring you perspectives from around the world. Help us to inform and educate. Your donation is tax-deductible. Join over 400 people to become a donor or you could choose to be a sponsor.

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member