Employing a mix of common sense, calculated gambles and good business practice to hold the high ground, Qatar has emerged the clear winner in the battle of the airlines.
When its Gulf neighbors — Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, joined by Egypt — launched a land, air and sea blockade of Qatar in the early morning hours of June 5, 2017, the reason cited by what came to be called the quartet was that the Qataris were sponsors of terrorism.
It was then, and remains today, an odd charge given that the leaders of the blockade, the Saudis and the Emiratis, had much to answer for in their own back stories regarding terror funding. Added to that, Qatar is home to Al Udaid airbase, the largest US military facility in the Middle East. The base was at the heart of the air war against ISIS in Iraq and continues to fulfill the same role in Syria.
The story of terror funding by the Gulf states, including by Qatar, remains opaque and unlikely ever to be fully told. However, there were other reasons for the blockade, and chief among them was an effort to bring down Qatar Airways.
For several years prior to the embargo, the company had an annual growth rate of 20%. The airline ordered new planes at an aggressive rate, including a 100-aircraft deal for $18 billion with Boeing, announced in 2016. In doing so, Qatar Airways challenged the market dominance of the UAE’s Dubai-based Emirates and Abu Dhabi’s Etihad airlines. In the eyes of Qatar Airways executives, the blockade was designed so as to do maximum harm to their business at a time when both Emirates and Etihad were feeling strong commercial heat from their Gulf rival.
The ferocity with which the blockading countries launched their attack on Qatar Airways was unprecedented in the annals of peacetime aviation history. It was conducted without warning, with no thought for the safety of passengers already in the air, and with utter disregard for contractual obligations.
At a meeting I had with senior executives of the company in September 2017, I was told how they had coped when flights already en route on June 5 were denied clearance to land at quartet airports. With 100-plus flights daily to 18 different cities across the four countries, the first concern was for those passengers already in the air as well as those waiting to board flights.
The Qatar Airways website had been blocked, so the company told passengers to use Facebook as a means of making arrangements. During the course of the day, several thousand flights were rebooked. Meanwhile, the airline’s offices in the quartet countries had been locked and sealed. The company had to deal quickly with 500 employees who, without warning, were denied access to their offices and their work. Qatari citizens were given two weeks to leave, while quartet nationals found themselves not only without jobs but also under a cloud of suspicion.
The airline also organized emergency flights to prevent food and medicine shortages by deploying its fleet of 22 air freighters. Prior to the blockade, roughly 40% of the country’s food supplies had entered across the land border with Saudi Arabia. Working closely with the Turks and the Iranians, the threat of severe shortages was averted within 48 hours of the implementation of the blockade. The early images of bare shelves and panic buying, much circulated by quartet media outlets, quickly disappeared.
The air blockade was an enormous challenge, one that Qatar Airways handled with a degree of quiet professionalism and determination that underlined the company’s message that, despite the best efforts of the Quartet, it was and would remain business as usual.
Reversal of Fortune
Fast-forward 18 months and Qatar Airways is in solid good health. It is Abu Dhabi’s Etihad that is struggling. The airline has just announced it is laying off 50 of its pilots. It has also canceled the purchase of 10 Airbuses and cut routes as it struggles to slash costs and contain staggering losses that in 2016 stood at $2 billion and a further $1.9 billion in 2017. It has yet to announce its losses for 2018. In a humiliating acknowledgement of its dire straits, Etihad abruptly shuttered its first and business class lounge at London Heathrow in October.
Part of Etihad’s woes have to do with a disastrous foray into the European market that saw them purchase big chunks of failing airlines. In June 2014 the company took a 49% stake in Alitalia, as well as controlling shares of an associated business. Including the purchase of five landing spots at London Heathrow, the total bill amounted to an eye watering $640 million. As Alitalia reeled, Etihad continued to pour money into what seemed to a black hole. Alitalia declared bankruptcy in May 2017.
Another airline that Etihad had invested in substantially, Air Berlin, went bankrupt in August 2017. The loss to the company of that blunder stands at $800 million. Now comes word that the Abu Dhabi carrier, which was Air Berlin’s main shareholder, is facing a $2.3 billion suit for the way in which it pulled the plug on the German carrier.
A winner from the collapse of Air Berlin is Lufthansa. With its rival now out the way, Lufthansa stands a better chance of nursing itself back to health and will press the case that all three Gulf airlines, by virtue of being owned by their wealthy governments, are receiving unfair subsidies that threaten to ruin their competitors.
Salt on the Wound
Meanwhile Qatar Airways has consolidated its purchase of Meridiana, a faltering Italian airline. In September 2017, after weathering the blockade storm, it took a 49% stake in the company. In February of last year, Meridiana rebranded as Air Italy and announced plans to expand its fleet from 11 to 50 aircraft by 2022, nicely filling the market gap left by the bankruptcy of Alitalia. Five of the new fleet are Airbus A330s from Qatar Airways.
Salt on the wound, it would seem, but Qatar Airway’s executives, ever the professionals, are taking care not to crow at the expense of Etihad. That troubled airline, under a new CEO, is struggling to deny rumors that it will merge with Emirates. Of course, it may well be the case that the last thing the Dubai carrier needs is to take on board its woefully underperforming Abu Dhabi counterpart, even as a gesture of fraternal support.
As Etihad flounders, it is the Qataris who have turned the tables on their rivals. Employing a mix of common sense, calculated gambles and good business practice to hold the high ground, Qatar has emerged the clear winner in the battle of the airlines. That ought to send a message to call time. Diplomatically and politically, the Saudis and the Emiratis have no support from their significant allies for continuing the blockade. How soon before they acknowledge the reality and put an end to this debilitating and frankly silly feud?
*[A version of this article was originally published by Gulf House.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.