Almost five years ago, all member states of the United Nations signed the 2030 Agenda on. This agenda includes 17 goals (SDGs) on global challenges such as poverty, urbanization and climate action, all featuring targets and indicators to measure progress.
The SDGs were brought in to replace the millenniumgoals ( ) and, unlike their predecessors, they apply to all countries in the world, developing and developed alike. Compared with the , the SDGs also represent a more holistic view on , incorporating its social, economic and environmental dimensions, as well as the importance of equality, justice and partnerships.
It’s Time for a New Global Movement
African states have been active supporters of the SDGs and have established high-level institutions and development policies aimed at supporting their implementation. However, almost five years since the adoption of the SDGs, progress on implementation remains mixed. North Africa represents the best-performing region on the continent, while Central Africa is the worst-performing. In West Africa and East Africa, there is stagnation in progress toward most of the goals, while , as a region, is not on track to meet any of the SDGs.
With only 10 years to go until 2030, we now enter what the UN has called the “decade of action.” This means it is now time to speed up bids to meet the pledges on SDGs. Based on current trends, what are the prospects of this happening in?
Halfway Toward the Goals
According to the latest produced by the SDG Center for SDG Index and the UN-affiliated Solutions Network (SDSN), the continent as a whole is barely halfway to achieving the SDGs. Global performance on the SDGs is also falling short, with only Nordic countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Finland, on track to meeting most goals by 2030. However, for most residents of these countries, meeting the goals will not make much of a difference to their already high standards of living, while progress on the goals in African countries will significantly change people’s lives.
Current progress, or the lack thereof, can be explained by a range of factors. This includes the lack of policy coherence and coordination across different levels of government, as well as lack of adequate financial resources, capacity, political will or limitations in terms of the data required to monitor the achievement of the SDGs. Moreover, there is also a relationship between levels of progress on SDG implementation and levels of political, economic and governance transformation. This becomes clear when comparing the findings of the Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI) analysis of political, economic and governance trajectories in the region.SDG Index and the soon-to-be-released
The outcomes largely align when it comes to the best-performing countries and also the worst performing countries — most of them in Central and some in East. However, there are some interesting findings when it comes to those in the middle.
Best and Worst
Overall, the front-runners in the SDG Index are those that BTI considers to be performing best in terms of political and economic transformation, as well as governance performance. This is the case of Mauritius, which is the highest-scoring country in the consolidated democracy, advanced in terms of economic transformation and good in terms of governance. Countries such as Tunisia, Botswana and Ghana represent similar characteristics and similarly stand among the top 10 of best-ranking countries on the SDG Index.SDG Index and which BTI considered to be a
On the other end of the spectrum are countries such as Eritrea, Somalia and South Sudan. These countries are at the bottom of the SDG Somalia, South Sudan), a lack of multi-party elections (Eritrea) and, in all cases, rudimentary levels of economic transformation.ranking and are also among the nations that BTI scores most poorly in its soon-to-be-published 2020 report on the region, due to ongoing civil conflict (
This makes any kind of coherent development planning and implementation nearly impossible. “Easternfeatures several countries with some of the lowest levels of human development in the world, including Burundi, Eritrea, Somalia and South Sudan,” the report explains.
Contrasts are represented by countries such as Rwanda, which performs well on the hard-line autocracy. On the other hand, Madagascar performs very poorly on the SDG Index, (position 44 out of 52 countries), but scores relatively well in terms of political and governance performance, according to BTI, although it is making limited progress on its economic transformation.SDG Index — coming 12th out of 52 countries — but which BTI politically considers to be a
The example of Rwanda shows the difference that high-level political leadership and commitment to SDG implementation can make, even in the absence of effective democracy, supported by rising levels of economic growth. Madagascar, on the other hand, has experienced some political instability over the past years as well as stagnating economic growth rates, which has hampered progress toward the global goals.
Looking Ahead to 2030
Although the best governance scores are found exclusively among democracies, overall it seems that a combination of good governance and economic transformation, rather than good governance and high levels of political transformation, contribute to higher levels of progress toward the SDGs. This is not only illustrated by the case in Rwanda but also in Djibouti, where hard-line authoritarian regimes have recorded some impressive development achievements, including high economic growth.
Yet while economic growth is important to generate the resources to fund better services, infrastructure and employment opportunities, this needs to be combined with long-term planning and action for SDG implementation. For such action to be integrated, inclusive and sustained, this requires the participation of all sectors, levels and actors of society, including civil society, universities and the private sector. This necessitates political systems that are open, transparent and accountable. Ifis in it for sustainable development in the long haul, the time for political transformation is now.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.