I must admit that if, when I was 16 and John F. Kennedy won the presidency, you had tried to tell me about President Donald Trump (and that he got two terms!), I would have thought it the lamest joke and you the worst joker (or biggest idiot) on the face of this planet.
Now, mind you, it’s true that all great powers invariably go down in their own fashion, but never, I suspect, quite in the fashion of Donald J. Trump’s America. And consider that no small thing for what was, not so long ago, the greatest power on the face of the Earth, if not in all of human history. In that context, it needs to be said that not many of us in our history have had to live through something quite as bizarre as Trump being the head of the greatest power not just on this planet now, but possibly ever.
In short, he is giving decline a distinctly new meaning.
If only we could all walk out on him the way he walked out on NBC’s Kristen Welker in the middle of a June interview, when she challenged him over his wild claims of election fraud in California’s primaries. But no such luck, of course.
And yet, consider this a guarantee: With over two years left to go, Trump is undoubtedly going to give decline (and fall) a new meaning.
America’s unwinnable wars
After all, no one is in control of him — not even himself. In his own mind at least, he’s clearly the president, ruler, king, dictator, you name it, of the increasingly (dis)United States of America. In fact, he should truly be considered a one-of-a-kind, even the first of a kind, in the quarter-millennia of our history. And yes, we Americans live in a country that, in the more than three-quarters of a century since the US emerged successfully from World War II as the great imperial power, has made war anything but successfully across the planet — from Korea and Vietnam to Afghanistan, Iraq and now Iran (and that’s not faintly a full list, either). And now, Trump has talked about essentially invading Iran. Of course, he’s also talked about making peace with Iran and, given him, anything could happen.
Not that “our” president would notice, but consider it extraordinary that, since World War II, the greatest power on this planet hasn’t been able to win its wars of choice against countries whose power bore literally no relation to America’s. Of course, in the last four-plus years in Ukraine, that other great power, Vladimir Putin’s Russia, has discovered that such a fate is anything but Washington’s alone.
In that sense, whatever may happen, Iran at this moment is all too typical. Somehow, especially in a world where it seems that any power can have the latest in drone weaponry and missiles, being number one has become a formula not for imperial success but imperial disaster (again and again and again). Explain that as you will, it certainly isn’t typical of the history of imperial powers over the centuries.
And here’s something I wonder about: Have this country’s leaders learned anything from the war-making disasters of the last three-quarters of a century? Not a chance, it seems! In Trump’s first term, he might have appeared to be a rarity among American presidents — one who had learned something about this country’s historic inability to win its imperial wars of choice planetwide since 1945. Except for a spat with ISIS in Syria, he avoided war-making entirely in his first term in office. But explain it as you will, with four years off to think things over, no such luck the second time around.
Trump is at war with the planet
Oh, and let me just add that the country that may become the greatest power on a future Earth (if such a livable planet even turns out to exist) is certainly China. Its leaders seem to have learned a lesson from Washington’s war-making disasters. With the exception of a war with Vietnam in 1979 and some border skirmishes with India between 2020 and 2022, it has spread its influence globally (in part, by creating most of the green energy architecture for this increasingly desperate world of ours) without going to war. Yes, there’s no question that it has built up its military and made itself the third major atomic power on this planet after the US and Russia. Still, its leaders since Mao Zedong have shied away from war.
And by the way, consider it a genuine miracle that, with nine nuclear powers now on this planet (and an ongoing war over the possible tenth), in the 80 years since the US atomically blasted the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II, no country has ever again used an atomic weapon. Given humanity, who would even believe it?
Wait, let me add a footnote to that point. It’s true that no country’s military has ever again dropped an atomic bomb or launched an atomic missile, but give us humans some credit. After all, ever so long ago, we came up with a slow-motion version of atomic warfare, which has now gained the name “climate change” — a name that, in fact, is far too mild for such an all-too-slow-motion nuclear-style reality.
And when it comes to that, there can be no question that Donald Trump is at war with this planet (and so the rest of us) in a big-time fashion. A hoax, a scam, a con job, you name it and he’s probably used it to describe what we humans (and himself in particular) have been doing to our world. Only recently, in fact, he insisted that the Earth is actually “cooling as a planet.” Meanwhile, he seems to have little short of an overwhelming urge to turn our world into a genuine hothouse, as heat records indeed continue to be set both globally and in the US. Only recently, in fact, his Environmental Protection Agency made it clear that its officials consider any actions to deal with climate change to be “futile.”
On a planet heating up by the year (and one where wars only add staggering amounts of carbon to the atmosphere), Trump is prepared to make war, whether on Iran or on the planet itself, and so, on the rest of us — and even in some strange sense on himself. If you don’t mind my ending this piece on a grim note, think of Trump as, in every sense imaginable, this country’s possible ETP — our end times president.
[Tom Engelhardt first published this piece on Substack.]
[Lee Thompson-Kolar edited this piece.]
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 3,000+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.









Comment