FO° Talks: The Evolving Role of Diplomats in a New World Order

In the latest FO° Talks, Peter Isackson interviews Jean-Daniel Ruch, a seasoned diplomat and political advisor, discussing the evolving role of diplomacy in the 21st century. Diplomats face new challenges in promoting peace amid modern warfare, with intelligence services influencing policy decisions. Ruch emphasizes the critical perspective diplomats bring, particularly in addressing political, historical, and religious aspects in shaping policy options.

Check out our comment feature!

In this edition of FO° Talks, Fair Observer Chief Strategy Officer Peter Isackson speaks with Jean-Daniel Ruch, who served as Switzerland’s ambassador to Serbia, Turkey and Israel. Ruch was also a political advisor to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Isackson and Ruch delve into the evolving role of diplomacy in the 21st century.

Traditionally, the role of the diplomat has been to promote peace by keeping political leaders informed. Diplomats serve not only as their government’s voice but as its eyes and ears in world capitals. They speak with important leaders, assess the mood and motivations of their host country and relay their assessments back home. These assessments are vital for giving political leaders the options they need to best manage relations and avoid or end war.

In the era of modern warfare, however, things have changed. The West is involved in two ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza. In these conflicts, governments increasingly rely on intelligence services and military intelligence to provide assessments and recommend policy options. This trend has reached a tipping point that has now endowed intelligence services with greater influence in defining policy than diplomats. Political leaders have largely sidelined diplomats, relegating them to the role of mouthpieces who announce decisions they have already made in consultation with intelligence.

This is a dangerous trend. An intelligence analyst is not a substitute for a diplomat. Diplomats bring a unique and invaluable perspective to the table. They seek to comprehend not only their nation's interests but also the complex web of interests of all actors involved. Effective diplomats develop an acute understanding of the concept of indivisible security, which is to say, the security and interests of all of the actors involved. While intelligence and the military focus on security alone, diplomats have the task of bringing into the equation essential political, historical, cultural and religious aspects, making their role pivotal in shaping policy options.

The legacy of Cold War tensions

The issues in Israel have become a diplomat's nightmare. Diplomats have been crying for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, but nothing has come of their repeated attempts. Part of the issue with a two-state solution is that no major political capital has been willing to invest in finding and implementing a solution.

Russia is the other major problem that diplomats must now deal with. Ruch maintains that the war in Ukraine could potentially have been avoided, well before the Russian invasion. When Vladimir Putin became president in 2000, US President Bill Clinton was finishing up his second term. Putin met with Clinton and suggested the idea of Russia joining NATO. Clinton appeared favorable to the suggestion, but later that same day, when the two met again, Clinton explained that his people told him Russia's joining NATO was not possible.

Europeans have debated the question of pan-European security for decades. Moscow advocated but never implemented ot. French President Macron at various times before, and even after the Russian invasion he was favorable to a solution based on this principle, but to no effect. 

The issues with Russia have always been present, and this is because the mentality of the Cold War never disappeared. The West perceived the Soviets as a threat to the West because they came with a totally different model of society. After the Cold War, the US and the Soviets needed to reach some kind of mutual understanding, if only to prevent a nuclear holocaust, which the world came close to experiencing during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. The most important of these agreements was the ABM Treaty of 1972. George W. Bush scrapped this treaty in the early 2000s at the same time he was launching new wars in the Middle East.

Since those events, mistrust has become a dominant factor in the relationship between Washington and Moscow.

[Jean-Daniel Ruch's latest book, Crimes, Hate, Tremors: From One Cold War to the Other, in Pursuit of Peace and Justice, is now available on Amazon.]

[Liam Roman wrote the first draft of this piece.]

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO Talks: Why Social Media and Clickbait Are Undermining Journalism

FO Talks: Why Killing Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei Did Not Collapse the Regime

March 13, 2026

FO Talks: Could a US Strike Unite Iran Instead of Breaking It?

March 12, 2026

FO Talks: Iran War — Former Israeli Negotiator Josef Olmert Explains What Comes Next

March 11, 2026

FO Talks: India–US Trade Deal Agreement and the Real Beginning of Liberalization 2.0

March 10, 2026

FO Exclusive: A New Iran–US Conflict Looms Large

March 09, 2026

FO Exclusive: A Hot Mess After the Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

March 08, 2026

FO Exclusive: Global Lightning Roundup of February 2026

March 07, 2026

FO Talks: India and China Can No Longer Avoid Each Other, Militarily and Economically

March 02, 2026

FO Talks: Can Spirituality Transform Capitalism?

March 01, 2026

FO Talks: Esther Wojcicki on Raising Resilient Children in an Age of Fear and Authoritarianism

FO Talks: Are Companies Using Software to Quietly Eliminate Your Legal Rights?

February 27, 2026

FO Talks: Josef Olmert on Why a US Strike on Iran Now Seems Inevitable

February 26, 2026

FO° Talks: Great Power Competition Is Back: How the US Plans to Deter China and Russia

February 20, 2026

FO° Talks: End of American Global Leadership? Trump, Tariffs and the Rise of a Multipolar World

February 19, 2026

FO Talks: Decoding Mark Carney’s Davos Speech Amid Rising Global Strategic Competition

February 17, 2026

FO Talks: Iran Is Breaking From Within, But Regime Collapse Won’t Look Like 1979

February 16, 2026

FO Talks: Is Sovereignty Dead? Trump’s Maduro Arrest and the End of Global Norms

February 15, 2026

FO Exclusive: Xi Jinping’s Military Purge Signals Rising Paranoia in China

February 10, 2026

FO Exclusive: Mark Carney Challenges American Hegemony at Davos

February 09, 2026

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA